[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network
Join Our eMail List
Email:

Photobucket

An $8 Billion Mockery of May 19

by: Robert Cruickshank

Fri Mar 13, 2009 at 10:21:44 AM PDT


As Arnold Schwarzenegger starts the campaign for the May 19 special election ballot measures, the Legislative Analyst's Office points out that the budget deal will come up short by $8 billion and that it hasn't solved our structural revenue shortfall problems:

"Unfortunately, the state's economic and revenue outlook continues to deteriorate," the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) said in a review of the package, which covered the remainder of this fiscal year and all of the next.

"Even in the few weeks since the budget was signed, there have been a series of negative developments. Our updated revenue forecast projects that revenues will fall short of the assumptions in the budget package by $8 billion. Consequently, the Legislature and governor will need to adopt billions of dollars in additional solutions in the coming months to bring the 2009-10 budget back into balance."

Taylor had some more bad news for the state's political leaders. Because so many of the "solutions" adopted last month are temporary, "without corrective actions, the state's huge operating deficits will reappear in future years - growing from $12.6 billion in 2010-11 to $26 billion in 2013-14."

The full LAO report in fact makes some assumptions I would consider rosy, such as a recovery in employment and personal income in 2009, when many economists do not expect this to occur until the second half of 2010 at best.

What this means is that the budget situation is still a total mess, and that improvement is far away. The May 19 election will have little meaningful impact on the state's financial health, although a spending cap would ensure that services will continue to be gutted. Republicans and Arnold Schwarzenegger are likely to use the deficit projections as an argument for Prop 1A, when all that will accomplish is an even worse destruction of core services, such as schools which could face larger cuts than what we're seeing now, a truly frightening thing to consider.

This also means political leaders who deny the need to find tax solutions, like Jerry Brown, are not being realistic. Fundamental change is necessary, and perhaps a constitutional convention alongside the elimination of the 2/3 rule conservative veto can help get us there.

One thing is certain - if anyone thinks California can remain a competitive place to do business and attract jobs and employees with the worst school system in the nation and no ability to address our water, transportation, or health care crises, they are deeply deluded.

Robert Cruickshank :: An $8 Billion Mockery of May 19
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
budget (0.00 / 0)
  It is vital that initiatives to change the 2/3rds rule for both taxes and the budget are qualified.  Here's the scenario:

 1)  The May 19 initiatives are voted down (or most of     them).

 2)  Budget deadlock.  The state is near or at insolvency
and payments to localities, welfare and health payments, etc are suspended.

 3)  Schwartz calls a special election for September.  With the collapse of the state imminent, both the budget and the tax initiative pass (Schwartz will call one or else a recall is started against him--a recall that would suceed).

 4)  The September initiatives pass.  The legislature passes taxes on corporations and high income earners, restores California solvency, and the right-wing lunatic asylum we have been living in for the last 30 years ends.

 5)  The Republican party reforms along New York lines and starts offering legitimate suggestions for public improvement.


I suspect you are right (0.00 / 0)
The May 19 special election is something of a sad joke, but it's also going to do damage by creating election fatigue among voters. We desperately need an election later this year to deal with the real issues this state faces - including the 2/3 rule - but it's going to be difficult to organize for a second special election, necessary though it'll be.

I certainly hope the scenario you propose materializes.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
Does anyone actually believe the voters will go along with this? (0.00 / 0)
I'm convinced they will not, except the salary thing (which is dumb) out of pure orneriness.

One thing I know I cannot do, and that is to vote for the regressive sales tax. Without that, the whole thing falls apart.

After the Gov vetoed the Dems' December budget bill, they should have faced the fact that no actual negotiations were happening, sent it right back to him and gone on the offensive against the Gov all around the State. A coordinated push at the Assembly District Caucus elections would have been the perfect opportunity to rally support from the activists. The will of Democratic voters and Democratic volunteers seem to have be completely left out the picture. Do they really think their voters will support this thing?

To have "negotiated," then come up with the result they did and STILL have to beg a handfull of Republicans to support it was totally ridiculous.


I doubt voters will. (0.00 / 0)
It's a pretty bad deal, and I agree that Dems ought to have stood their ground on the majority vote deal (as well as more strongly argued for higher income taxes on the wealthy) instead of cutting this confused and ultimately insufficient deal.

I have to disagree on the sales tax, though. I think when we speak of its regressivity, we must always keep in mind that is a relative condition. Sales taxes are progressive when compared to spending cuts. If CTA had followed through on their threat to file an initiative to raise the sales tax to prevent these mass teacher layoffs I would have strongly and loudly advocated for it.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
Prop 1A is a fraud (0.00 / 0)
Funny how they try to hide the fact that Prop 1A is a tax increase.

Snake oil salesman, Arnold Schwarzenegger... (0.00 / 0)
is back on the campaign trail with a variation on his 2005 props put on the ballet under duress in this most engaging of all recent budget sessions. You know, the one that was supposed to be, BY LAW, passed by June 15th of each year...but was not finished until this February....

Well, here's the latest article detailing Arnold's sales tour (a prelude to a run for Senate???):
http://www.latimes.com/news/lo...

Ironic that these props that are being said to be oh so necessary to pass during this little tiny special election. A miniscule percentage of voters will be making the choice of the future direction of California's financial health. Scarey times.

I have been trying to get the LINK on the Secretary of State's website with the actual TEXT for each and the arguments for/against that I had printed out yesterday, but it seems it may have been taken down.

I have a printed copy that I'm working from right now, but why would this have been removed???


Special elections=effective county budget cuts (0.00 / 0)
Though the state budget cuts were the constant theme of male vice-chair candidate Eric Bauman at the three regional events statewide CDP candidates attended yesterday, nobody mentioned the cost of these constant special elections. Initiated mostly by the governor, they are paid for by the counties. They, therefore, further deplete the already overburdened county budgets and constitute an effective additional cut to shrinking county funds.

In short, we get invisible county budget cuts, and all we have to show for them are these lousy propositions--none of which anybody was happy about at any of the meetings I went to. And I'm averaging at least two a week.


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads
Photobucket


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox