[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network
Join Our eMail List
Email:

Photobucket

Arnold's Plan: Destroy Public Schools

by: Robert Cruickshank

Thu Jan 01, 2009 at 14:46:21 PM PST


The details of Arnold's budget plan are in and it is even more insane than we thought. His budget includes large cuts to public schools, which are bad enough in their own right. But the specific kinds of cuts are going to trigger a snowball effect that could destroy public schools in California - and I don't believe that's an exaggeration.

California schools could eliminate a week of instruction and increase class sizes next year under Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's new plan for solving the state's budget crisis.

Vowing to give schools maximum flexibility to cut costs, the proposal unveiled Wednesday also would allow districts to eliminate one of two science courses required for high school graduation.

Schwarzenegger's plan would provide no teacher salary increases, eliminate a program providing subsidies to overhaul low-performing schools, and suspend participation in a program encouraging teachers to obtain national certification.

In and of themselves these cuts are damaging and reckless. California students need MORE science instruction, not less, if they're going to be globally competitive. Cutting instruction isn't going to help students learn more, and will lead to corner-cutting by teachers and administrators alike.

Those damaging cuts become catastrophic, however, in the context of No Child Left Behind. Arnold's proposals are likely to cause numerous schools to fail to meet federal standards set by the law, especially when subsidies to low-performing schools are cut. Because NCLB mandates the closure of low-performing schools, Arnold's budget if enacted as-is would virtually ensure the closure of numerous schools in this state.

Arnold's budget also leaves schools facing their own cash crisis during the school year (and in prime testing season):

The governor has proposed to ease the pain, in part, by accounting transfers involving state transportation funds and by deferring $2.8 billion in school payments from April to July. Wells said the state, by deferring payments for three months, would place an "awful" new burden on school districts to secure short-term loans.

It will be extremely difficult to secure those kinds of loans, but Arnold continues to delude himself into thinking the private sector is interested in lending to state government or its affiliated agencies.

There are plenty of other ridiculous elements to Arnold's budget but the kinds of education cuts proposed are a good example of just how badly Arnold has screwed up our state. One has to wonder whether this is a shock-doctrine style plan to force mass privatization of public schools in California by starving them of revenue and forcing them to close when they inevitably are unable to meet NCLB standards.

Two years from now a new governor will be sworn in. I wonder if California can wait that long.

Robert Cruickshank :: Arnold's Plan: Destroy Public Schools
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
No Plan at All (0.00 / 0)
I was just in the process of getting to this.  It really just disgusts me.  His plan for getting out of a recession is to stop educating our children? Has anything more ridiculous been said?

And of course, this has been where the Republicans have been wanting to go for a long time.  After all, why pay for public schools when you can send your kids to private schools?

It is a sad day indeed when it becomes acceptable to even propose this kind of draconian cuts.

I'm proud to work for Kamala Harris for AG.


teachers (0.00 / 0)
I was just talking to a teacher friend of mine who estimates that, between the week less of school, the shifting of health care to more of a burden on the individual, and this lame attempt to try and count a week of winter break as a "week off" even though the pay structure is year-round, he will lose about $10,000 in the next year.

The real tragedy here is that it got to this point to begin with.  It's not possible to fill a $41B budget hole.  Even Arnold's plan doesn't do it, opting to push some debt into the future and magically borrow from private investors (yeah, they're clamoring to hand money to California).  Failing to recognize the negative effects of a downturn given the volatile nature of the revenue stream is on the heads of every legislator in Sacramento.  And it all goes back to 2/3 and the Republican hijacking of the state finances, with predictable consequences.


Because our schools already have a superfluous week of instruction (0.00 / 0)
and the class sizes are so tiny!

I know that our excellent local public elementary school in Oakland has to work miracles every single year to make ends meet, and that's with a really active parent-teacher group that does lots of outside fundraising.

Glad the budget is being balanced on the back of my second-grader.  That seems pretty fair.  


It's an increase over 08-09 actuals (0.00 / 0)
Check out the General Fund Budget Proposal, page 12, figure SUM-05:

K-12 education gets an 11.9% increase and Higher education gets a 5.5% increase.  Isn't that a reasonable starting point for discussion given the fiscal condition of the state?

Adam Haverstock - Editor, The Policy Report


I have to wonder about that (0.00 / 0)
I don't quite know how Arnold's people can make that claim given the kind of cuts detailed here. What exactly is being increased? Or is it some sort of accounting trick? If there is money to increase the funding why cut instruction and jeopardize numerous schools' NCLB ratings?

That doesn't really make sense.

As to "the fiscal condition of the state" - if we continue with spending cuts we are going to throw this state into a Depression, which isn't exactly going to help that fiscal condition very much. Teachers with $10,000 less in their pockets don't spend that money on tax-generating activities, which causes ripple effects of further unemployment and business failure.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
09-10 Budget includes "proposed" cuts (0.00 / 0)
Because the revisions denoted under the "revised" category were never implemented (they are just the Governor's proposals), the numbers for 08-09 "revised" are just fiction from the Governor.

"Due to significant declines in anticipated revenues since the budget was enacted, the Administration proposes total Proposition 98 expenditure reductions of $2.5 billion in 2008-09 in the special session, including eliminating the partial COLA provided to K-12 revenue limits and community college apportionments, Child Care programs savings, and further reducing general purpose funding for all Local Education Agencies, which will be accompanied by dramatic flexibility provisions that will allow LEA's to transfer categorical funds at their discretion to ensure adequate funding for essential classroom instruction and services." ("revised" 08-09 link)

Most of the remainder of the $2.6 billion identified is the above cost shift from FY 08-09 to FY 09-10, done as a one time budget gimmick from April of CY 2009/FY 08-09 to July of CY 2009/FY 09-10. (page 37) That is paid back in FY 09-10 and makes up the difference and the apparent increase in spending.


[ Parent ]
My only civil reaction (0.00 / 0)
is to note that one less week of school will cost many families a few hundred dollars in child care expenses. Oh, good thing they didn't raise the VLF!

On a less civil/practical note, we could save a lot more by cutting a week out of the prison calendar.  

Fry, don't be a hero! It's not covered by our health plan!


My civil reaction is civil disobedience (0.00 / 0)
Every GOP member of the assembly and senate should have people coming in waves into their offices, encouraging people to arrest them.  Students, parents, teachers, and other members of their districts.

Make sure there are lots of cameras there.


[ Parent ]
How to cut 200+ lbs. of ugly, useless fat (0.00 / 0)
What's the Governor's personal budget?

Do we really need him?


with 2/3 for budget, taxes and veto override (0.00 / 0)
there really is no reason not to just scrap the statehouse and go to a parlimentary system.

less government!

surf putah, your friendly neighborhood central valley samizdat


[ Parent ]
Constitutional Change You Can Believe In (0.00 / 0)
It works fine in Canada.  And in a lot of places as well.

This is actually a really good idea.  Checks and balances at the federal level are there for a lot of historical reasons, many of which no longer make any sense, and never really made sense at the state level.  The original states had to be "bribed" into the new federal union.  Small states were afraid of the power of the large states.   And I suspect that enough American politicians feared unlimited parliamentary power, mostly due to the excesses of the English Civil War; you can argue that the Restoration of the English Crown was seen by many of them as a "check" on the limits of a future Cromwell.

But in retrospect:  a unicameral state parliament has clear accountability, much shorter election campaigns (weeks instead of a year or more), and the state premier has the powers of a governor.

It's a pretty reasonable system.


[ Parent ]
Arnold doesn't matter (0.00 / 0)
Since Arnold has virtually zero influence in the legislature, and that a 2/3 majority (if one ever emerges) can override him if a bill ever gets to his desk, does it really matter what the Governator proposes?

The Governor is nothing more than a talking head at this point, what really matters is getting to 2/3 in the legislature and repealing the 2/3 requirement (in the long run).  The Governor can propose anything he likes, the legislature will pass what it wants to pass and, if Arnold vetoes it, can override him.


GOP hates public schools (0.00 / 0)
they want their buddies to make money with their private schools. Make public schools so crappy...force parents to go with private schools.

it's bigger than just profit (0.00 / 0)
public schools educate middle and working class children, of all races and ethnicities, and give them a shot at making it. that's competition for those at the top.

weakening public ed helps keep the rabble in their place.

surf putah, your friendly neighborhood central valley samizdat


[ Parent ]
To remember Arnie's hypocrisy (0.00 / 0)
I took this picture in the spring and promptly placed it in my irony file:



Fry, don't be a hero! It's not covered by our health plan!


That big man is hitting the kid with a torch (0.00 / 0)
Why is that mean man doing that?

[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads
Photobucket


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox