[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network
Join Our eMail List
Email:

Photobucket

John Burton to Use Latest in Campaign Tactics?

by: Bob Brigham

Wed Dec 24, 2008 at 11:18:40 AM PST


From an email John Burton sent, I have to wonder what year it is, 2008 or 1968?

The party should also provide the materials for a program to soften up Republican incumbents long before the election, such as draft letters to the editor around current issues, phone scripts for volunteer phone banks, and suggestions for radio call-in shows.

Uh, not to go all Jetsons or anything, but how about starting with a website? Which, ironically is the most efficient way for letters to the editor, volunteer phone calls (beyond banks even) and radio talk shows messaging. However, once you build a website you get into a "post-broadcast" potential where you find there are for more effective arrows in your quiver. Yet the overall return of investment is why for a few cycles now starting with a targeted website has been the most effective method to "soften up" incumbents. An online strategy helps in the following three key areas:

Fundraising
While the CDP can't start raising money for Democratic challengers prior to the Party endorsement or nomination, it can raise money for local central committees and clubs in a targeted district through a "dump-so-and-so" or such website. Better yet, for federal races, the CDP can use ActBlue's Democratic Nominee funds to turn candidate recruitment on it's head. Multiply that by re-occurring monthly donations and nominees can leave the primary with more COH than they had going into the final push. I predict this will be the biggest game-changer in the 2010 cycle, but you need an internet organizing program to make it happen. And building this infrastructure in the off year will allow the fundraising for the candidate to be far greater once the Party can leverage the investment early.

Communication
For years it has made no sense to focus on the internet as an ATM, so let's look communication. Unfortunately, the CDP went from a leader in online message dissemination in the 2004 cycle to junk in 2006, to constant but not that aggressive against Republicans in 2008. And now we have the expected next Party Chair not even mentioning the internet as a way to soften up Republicans. In short, communication is the biggest potential for setting up 2010 in 2009 and should be used to a degree against all Republicans (especially leadership and marginal districts). Plus, if you want you can easily do letters to the editor and calls to radio shows, but there is so much more to do it only makes sense once you are already using the more effective tactics.

Organizing
In 2008, Barack Obama took organizing to a new level while the CDP utterly failed to take advantage of it for campaigns in California. Yet the tool kit is out there (including bankless phone banks), a great number of people of been trained, and the budget mess is the perfect vehicle to translate that energy into organization -- with again the most efficient mechanism being to begin online.

While I totally agree with the goal of softening up Republicans, can we please remember which millennium this is when looking at the tactics to accomplish that goal? And I agree there is a strong role for the party, but it isn't materials, it is organizing and communication infrastructure.  

Bob Brigham :: John Burton to Use Latest in Campaign Tactics?
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I need more background on Burton (0.00 / 0)
I don't know much about the guy, but folks like Chris Finnie (who I have lots of respect for) are deeply unwhelmed with the idea he's replacing Art Torres.  Who was himself a deeply unwhelming chairman for the state party.

What's the politics here?  My impression is that Burton is close to Pelosi.  But what does he bring to the party?  Who thinks appointing him is a good idea?

I'm mostly at the torches-and-pitchfork stage in my thinking about the state Democratic Party apparatus.  Why do the electeds like these kind of dummies?  Why can't the rest of us get any purchase on the state party?  And are there alternatives to working with the state party, if it intends to continue wasting money and effort?


Any Chance We Draft Someone Else To Run The State Party? (0.00 / 0)
Someone, say, who believes 21st Century, hell, maybe even 20th Century communication technology/

I'm wary of Burton (0.00 / 0)
The fact that the party apparatus sends up the red flag that he will be a status quo chair when the status quo will be lethal to us.

Why not try educating Democrats on the basics (0.00 / 0)
like the registration process. In Santa Barbara, there is a "recount" going on because of poor information on how to do reg drives. The UCSB Dems and VERF really "f***ed up" big time here and now the Republicans are doing their homework on how to challenge voters and registrations for next time. And, trust me, it won't be just UCSB next time but on every campus.

Hook Burton up w/savy techno geeks and he'll do fine (0.00 / 0)
Burton's old school, but it need not be a burden on the party. He has great potential in that he effectively bridges the divide amongst powerhouse and small town politics. He's consistently solid in his dedication to core issues, a sharp wit, strong intellect and his drive is second to none.  Hook this guy up w/a technologically savy and progressive outreach campaign and plug in a message of shattering the status quo (from a master of the status quo) and people will notice.

Million dollar question is: Is Burton capable of serious reflection and truthful dedication to "change" for future generations or does he merely want to pal around w/movie stars and old labor buddies on behalf of the party until his dying day?


It's going to take more than that (0.00 / 0)
It's not just technology.  The problem is less technology than the problems the state party have with the people who have turned out to be good with the technology.

I'm sure the entrenched political consulting firms could hire a few computer hands.  But the technologies work because they bring in the hoi polloi into politics.  The consulting firms have been trying to keep those people out for years.

Without a change in the goals for what technology needs to accomplish, bringing in a few people that know web servers is not going to help.  


[ Parent ]
I understand where you're coming from and yes... (0.00 / 0)
It's ALL about "the message" and delivery. One has only to look at McCain's defeat to understand this.

Politicians can't ignore the power of technology - it's real and should they resist, the laws of nature will chew them up and spit them out. Obama proved to no end how the web could be used as a vehicle "into the heart of our homes" "for the people".  He delivered a message to heal those who've been violated and denied. In that, truth prevailed - one had only to open the door to your mind.

Communication (the message) is now "Mother's milk". As for Burton, Burton understands "mother's milk" but he's gun shy on communication because "talk" tears the veneer of the political persona. However, if Burton shifts it may offer a "genuine" intrinsic progression for generation...X,Y, and Z.

For example, we live in the times of lies, deceit, and the abuse of power - Burton personifies all this. He is a constant state of tension because he not only represents authority, but abhors it. He's a theatrical show of angst. That symbolism is a vehicle for communication and personifies generation X. (And as for hoi polloi? Hoi polloi politics is virtually his claim to fame.)

Political firms who avoid the hoi pollio? Say "good night" - they will sink. CA watched Arnold nose dive when he forsaked "the people" in lieu of Republican ideology. Partyism is soon to be obsolete. Soon it will be issue alone, because we've no need to join the herd; WE ARE, OURSELVES, POWER. And how best to express those issues? You know the answer.

Cyber Czars take note: politics is job security!


[ Parent ]
They won't sink, unfortunately (0.00 / 0)

Political firms who avoid the hoi pollio? Say "good night" - they will sink.
 

I wish.  The whole problem with the consultant class both nationally and here in California is that losing elections doesn't hurt your business.  I'd love it if these bastards would sink.  That the folks that ran the Prop 11 and the No on 8 campaign would take a hit for their mistakes.  But that hasn't been the trend nationally, and it hasn't been the trend in California.

I don't agree with you, though, about party being obsolete. Most of our success over the last 4 years has been due to a 50 state type approach.  In other words, party building.

The problem with Republicans isn't simply that they are partisan.  The problem with Republicans is that their policies are deeply unpopular, and that they've pissed off folks like the Latino community.

No, we need a working party structure here in California.  The only question is, do we take over the existing structure, or do we build one in parallel and use it to primary the machine's candidates where that makes sense.

A lot of people have tried the first approach over the last four years.  They don't have a lot to show for it, and I know that many of them are extremely frustrated with working inside the existing California Democratic Party.  So I think a proper insurgency is probably the better approach, unless Burton does something very, very soon to show folks like the ones here that we won't do better inside the tent pissing out, rather than go outside the tent and piss in.

I think it's time the Democratic machine in California got a salt water shower.


[ Parent ]
LOL! the pissing match...Great point! (0.00 / 0)
Take over the existing structure or build one in parallel:

The Obama camp won overwhelmingly because they "unified" both the old and the new. That is now the winning paradigm.

CDP's structure & hierarchy feeds a lot of egos, but if those egos are pissing on progress and unification, they're fracturing the party.  You're absolutely right - the CDP needs a leader who can effectively address those issues immediately. If he or she fails to do so, the "independents" will grow greater still because they abhor party egoism and their core complaint is repression of any kind.  

Obama's unification included healing the division of the Hillary camp, uniting organizations w/opposing points of views, and inviting non-party participants to engage the message.  Seriously a win-win situation if you ask me.

Don't piss on those old curmudgeons, move with them and around them, but not against; show them how you effectively move "their" word.    


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads
Photobucket


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox