[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network
Join Our eMail List
Email:

Photobucket

Joe Nation - In The Pocket of Big Business

by: Be_Devine

Wed May 21, 2008 at 14:04:10 PM PDT


The race in Senate District Three is essentially between Mark Leno and Joe Nation.  Mark Leno is the proven progressive.  Joe Nation is pretending to be a progressive in order to skate through to victory.  His true stripes, however, are unquestionably pro-corporate.  In case there was any doubt that Joe Nation is in the pocket of big business and will quickly drop his progressive charade if elected, the recent expenditures for his campaign put those doubts to rest.

The anti-consumer, “tort reform” group Civil Justice Association of California recently spent $240,000 sending out mailers for Joe Nation. A group like this does not spend a quarter million on a politician without expecting something in return. What does this anti-consumer organization expect in return?  You need look no further than their own description: "Industry-sponsored California group, advocating legal reforms to restrict tort recovery."

Put simply, groups like this want politicians to put business rights ahead of consumer rights.  They want to erase or water down all of California's laws that protect injured consumers and introduce new laws that protect businesses at the expense of taxpayers and consumers. 

Joe Nation already has proven that he will side with businesses over consumers.  For example, he joined the Republicans and the credit card companies and voted against Jackie Spier's landmark privacy legislation.  He has sided with Republicans and the insurance companies in opposing a single-payer health solution.  Now, Joe Nation has 240,000 new reasons to side with the anti-consumer, pro-corporate interests. 

Joe Nation is no progressive.  Don't be fooled into thinking he is.

Be_Devine :: Joe Nation - In The Pocket of Big Business
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
If you check out CJAC's website ... (0.00 / 0)
... you'll find out that their proudest accomplishment was the passage of Proposition 64 on the November 2004 ballot.  This "tort reform" measure has hurt every public interest avenue, but most notably environmental lawsuits.

Meanwhile, Joe Nation runs as a "climate change advisor."


Because that is what he earns his living as. (1.00 / 2)
If you ran, "Hack 'Journalist'" could be your ballot designation.

Interesting that you come here to comment on everything in sight, yet on your site, no comments are allowed.  Perhaps you don't care to have your frequent errors and dubious reporting noted.  


[ Parent ]
You can't beat the real thing (0.00 / 0)
Nation earns his living advising the Coca Cola Corporation, a company that has a horrific environmental record.  

Meanwhile, his client is working to privatize publicly-owned water resources so it can bottle the water that we own and sell it back to us.  And when Nation was on the Marin Municipal Water District, he seemed alarmingly receptive to the idea of bottling the water from Mt. Tamalpais.


[ Parent ]
Mark Leno - In the Pockets of the Indian Casinos (0.00 / 0)
Devine -

Why is it that Leno is the only candidate in the race that does NOT oppose the proposed casino in Rohnert Park?  Is it because he's accepted so much Indian casino money?

Mark is more than willing to stand on principle and support a single-payer health care system that won't see the light of day until there are 2/3 majorities in both chambers, but he's willing to capitulate on an Indian Casino that he will have a vote on.  Money talks, principles walk.  Typical of the history of representation for this senate district though, SF politicians support development in the part of the district they don't live in, couldn't find on a map and only reluctantly visit.  I'm not sure a massive urban casino that blights the skyline and would add 26,000 daily car trips to the area would get Mark's indiferent response if it was being planned for a quiet are of SF.  

Nation opposed the Speier bill because it screwed small banks and credit unions.  He opposed single payer health care because there was no funding mechanism attached to the bill so the vote was simply theater.  His health care plan is very close to what Sen. Obama has proposed.  He's rated 100% by CLCV, 100% by EQCA (and co-authored the gay marriage bill), 91% on labor, 100% from Planned Parenthood and Naral.  Saying he's not a progressive is a stretch and typical of disinformation campaign being waged by "real" progressives, unwilling to turn that critical eye on their own candidates.



Don't look behind the curtain (8.00 / 2)
Why is it that you don't address at all the issue that I raised (the fact that the anti-consumer CJAC has spent $240,000 to send out pro-Nation mailers)?  It must concern you that Nation is so close to this despicable organization, no?

And unless you're completely ill-informed, you must know that the Rohnert Park casino issue is a red herring.  Joe Nation has joined Carole Migden in using this issue to pander to voters.  But the reality is that there is nothing that the California Senate can do about the casino.  It is in the hands of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Governor's Office.  Leno has never said he supports the casino.  But he is the only one in this race who recognizes the practical reality that there is nothing that the State Senate can do.  He has said that he would rather focus on the issue he is being hired to tackle.

It is all fine and good for Nation to say that he "opposes" the casino, but what does that really mean?  What specifically does Nation propose to do to stop the casino?  Unless Joe Nation is trying to get President Bush to appoint him to the Bureau of Indian Affairs or unless he's planning to run for Governor, he will have absolutely no ability to do anything to stop the casino or even impact the plans.  None.

So, again, the choice is clear.  Do you prefer a politician like Joe Nation who will pander for votes by pretending he's going to do something about an issue over which he has no control?  Or do you prefer a candidate who actually tells the truth even when its not what people want to hear?

Oh, and should you choose to address the fact that Joe Nation is in the pocket of the CJAC and big business to the tune of more than $240,000, there is still plenty of space available for comments.


[ Parent ]
One of the herd (0.00 / 0)
I read somewhere that Joe and Linda are separated. Shocking! They worked so closely together on his prior campaign.  He is happy now, and he reportedly said that he and Linda see each other frequently. So they were unhappy together and now they're separated and happy. Maybe they'll fall in love and get a divorce. It's kinda like telling people you're going one way and then going another: shepherding the deluded.

I voted for his first term in the Assembly. Like a mosquito, Joe anesthetized the electorate with dazzling inaction. He didn't support anything democratic. There was always something about it that wasn't Republican enough. Meanwhile he went after bird killers and became, in less than two years, a climate sucks-pert. Touting his Rand Corporation PhD, Nation is evidence that Rand Corp. thinks PhDs should come out of its own box.

It's hard for me to think about him in terms of progressive when there are so many things about him that aren't real.


Rohnert Park casino (0.00 / 0)
Joe is the only candidate who even took the time to talk with Sonoma County groups who have working against the casino for the past five years.  What Joe plans to do is to lobby federal electeds and agencies on the federal level (yes, they do listen to state elected officials;  it does count for something), and he plans to explore legislation, among other things, as other state senators have done.  

Don Perata and Loni Hancock effectively stopped the planned 5,000 slot machine San Pablo casino.  Den Florez has written legislation to stop an urban casino in his district.  That's just two examples.

In 2003, they said the casino would break ground in 2004, and there was nothing anybody could do to stop it; it was all in the hands of Washington.  Then they said building would start in 2005, then 2006, then 2007.  Now they're saying 2008, but don't bet on it.  If those of us who live up here had listened to those who said there's nothing we can do, that casino would be up and running by now.  Joe knows it can be effectively fought from the state level - and we've never had a state senator who has helped us!

Those of us who worked hard and LEARNED that we could fight the casino on a local level don't need nay-sayers like Leno who is getting his information from some of the casino's chief supporters, such as Susan Moore, who is the President of the Friends of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, a group that exists for the sole purpose of getting the casino built.  Susan Moore recently held a fund-raiser that raised $10,000 for Leno.  No wonder he says there's nothing he could do to stop the casino.   Leno is simply spouting the casino party line.

If you want the truth about the Rohnert Park casino, go to stopthecasino101.com If you're not from here and/or you  don't know the facts, then shut up and get out the way.


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads
Photobucket


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox