[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
September 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network

Latest on the Los Angeles Double Bubble Trouble

by: Julia Rosen

Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 18:17:38 PM PST


(full disclosure: I work for the Courage Campaign)

Here is the latest on the "double bubble trouble".  Today the Los Angeles Board of Supervisors held a hearing.  Several people testified including Rick Jacobs and the Registrar of Voters Dean Logan.  The good news is that Logan sounded amenable towards counting the votes, but made no specific promises.

Any Decline-to-State voter who failed to mark the extra bubble indicating that they wanted to vote in the Democratic primary has not been counted thus far.  There are no guarantees it will happen and so we are continuing to press the issue until every vote possible is counted.

The Courage Campaign is doing three things right now.

  1. Requesting that the L.A. ROV conduct a count of all DTS votes, precinct by precinct.
  2. Requesting that the L.A. ROV immediately take steps to fix the DTS ballot design flaw for future primary elections
  3. Asking DTS voters across Los Angeles County to hold on to the receipt of their vote ("voting stub") until further notice.

As to #3 on this list.  If you are a DTS voter in Los Angeles County who asked for a Democratic Party ballot on Election Day and still have your paper receipt for voting ("voting stub") please let us know so our lawyers can insist that your ballot be counted.  

OR

If you are a DTS voter in Los Angeles County and you had trouble at the polls and/or believe your vote may not have been counted.

Please use this form to report your story and receipt number if you have it on the Courage Campaign website.

Courage Campaign lawyer Steven Kaufman (of Kaufman Downing LLP) sent a new letter (pdf here) today to the L.A. ROV.  Excerpts on the flip:

Julia Rosen :: Latest on the Los Angeles Double Bubble Trouble
It is clear that under the state election code that DTS voters who have inadvertently failed to fill in bubble numbers five and six after having received a Democratic or American Independent ballot, took all the required steps necessary to have their ballot counted, and that any additional issues inherent in the Inka-Vote system or ballot design process are contrary to law.

It is not sufficient to merely estimate the scope of the problem through random sampls and investigation. As you have stated in various media statements with regard to this issue, every effort to ascertain voter intent must be made by the Registrar's office. Taking the steps outlined below will help restore voter confidence and send a message to voters that their votes will count and that their vote does make a difference. All this can be accomplished within the 28-day statutory period for certification of the vote...

That is why the Courage Campaign is asking for a full recount.

After the votes are (hopefully) counted we will need to work hard to make sure this never happens again.  This can be fixed.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"... work hard to make sure this never happens again." (5.00 / 1)
On that final requirement, I'll repost some thoughts I posted late on a prior thread:

While I'm not directly familiar with the particular ballot tabulators in use in LA County, I do have close to 20 years in software system design. I find it very hard to accept at face value the claim that the ballot was designed with the extra bubble to "make vote tabulation faster." That must be an extraordinarily primitive system to have such an illogical requirement. Even so, as noted by others, "faster" should not be the issue; "counting the votes accurately and fairly" should be (and in fact is.)

Does the public and/or ergonomics professionals have any input into these ballot designs? Again, from my experience within a software design environment, too often the unfortunate answer to "Why are we doing something this way?" is "Because we've always done it that way." This, with little regard to either the inherent idiocy of a process or to employing better methods that become available over time. If competent outside parties were invited into the process, these kinds of inbreeding traps would happen less often and be less severe.  


And that does sound like some good news regarding the current kerfluffle! (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Well (0.00 / 0)
I don't have any direct knowledge of the efficiencies of the count, I will note that these are Ink-a-Vote systems not DREs.  No software to be found.

[ Parent ]
There are programs that run the Inkavote tabulators... (0.00 / 0)
.... and the pre-scanners that check for errors (overvotes, etc.), calculate totals, etc. Somebody is writing these programs to fit the specific requirements of our elections. One of the error checks obviously in the tabulators, but NOT in the pre-scanners, would go something like this "If this is a DTS/Democratic ballot AND bubble 6 is blank; THEN ignore presidential vote"

The software running the Inkavotes is not nearly as complicated nor prone to hacking as the DRE's, but there is software.


[ Parent ]
The subject made Democracy Now! Today (0.00 / 0)
On Thursday, Feb. 7th in the news segment at the front of the program.

Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox