[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
September 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network

The Cost of Voting Security

by: Julia Rosen

Tue Aug 07, 2007 at 16:23:44 PM PDT


States had several years after the Help America Vote Act passed to purchase new technology for voting.  It was at that time good government organizations started raising the warning flag about the security of many of the voting machines that companies like Diebold were marketing to county registrars.  Nobody really knew how secure they were, but the mere fact that they were operating on a Microsoft Operating System raised a lot of red flags.  Registrars were cautioned at the time to slow down and really examine what they were purchasing.  After all, the machines were not cheap.  Quite frankly, I believe it was a major flaw in the bill that it did not require the states to be in charge of the purchasing rather than the local registrars.  The patchwork system is coming back to bite us in the rear.

By and large they did not heed that call.  Now, several years down the road somebody actually did a real security test on the machines and low and behold they are not secure at all.  Secretary of State Debra Bowen did what she pledged to do in the campaign and the results of the top to bottom study left her with little chance but to decertify many of our voting machines, at least temporarily.

That is all a long way of saying that I am not exactly sympathetic to the whining coming out of the registrars about the costs of Bowen's move.  She moved with all deliberate speed and the complaints that this is a last minute move ring hollow.  The registrars should have known this was coming and planned for this occurrence when Bowen took office. We are still six months out from the election and machines still have the opportunity to be re-certified.

Julia Rosen :: The Cost of Voting Security
I have absolutely no problems with the state spending more money to ensure votes are counted correctly.  It is the underpinnings of our entire system of government.  A couple million dollars more and a bit of a delay and hearing the returns is well worth ensuring everybody's vote are recorded accurately and nobody is able to infiltrate the system is more than worth it.

This post was prompted by these two articles. "Voting-machine costs add up" and "E-voting changes to hit county hard".

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Happy to see you caught the Merc piece (0.00 / 0)
I found this part of the piece in the Merc just infuriating:
Santa Clara County's registrar of voters says the last-minute decision by the state secretary of state to curtail electronic voting next year could cost the county as much as $500,000, create lines up to three hours long on Election Day and slow voting results by as much as three days after the polls close.

The decision "put us into a delayed mode for informing the public," said Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters Jesse Durazo.

Durazo's frustration was echoed by registrars around the state, in the wake of Secretary of State Debra Bowen's decree late Friday that - because of security concerns - most voting machines would be "decertified" for use starting with the Feb. 5 presidential primary.


Since we've seen a series of articles like this from registrars around the state, using the same talking points, I'm guessing there's a coordinated effort.  I would not be surprised if the voting machine vendors like Diebold are helping out, and even funding, some of this PR effort.

Durazo has chutzpah.  He and other registrars have been seeing this situation build for years, and they cannot claim they were not warned.  They let themselves get sold on systems they did not understand and could not supervise, and then stonewalled an increasingly skeptical and hostile public.

Bowen is only the messenger here, and if they don't hold their fire, they're going to find who really is behind what Bowen is doing.

Tens of thousands of people like us.


Time To Clean House (0.00 / 0)
Most of the county registrars in the state appear to be either incompetent or corrupt.  The problems with electronic voting machines were obvious to any tech-savvy 13 year-old.  Never mind the academic experts, if they'd just asked their kids, they could have avoided this mess themselves in the first place.

Quite frankly, I believe it was a major flaw in the bill that it did not require the states to be in charge of the purchasing rather than the local registrars.

That wasn't a bug, it was a feature.  The whole point of the Republican legislation was to "fix" the problem in the old-style Las Vegas sense of the term.  And who better to help them do that than the same old patsies who ran the system so sloppily in the first place?


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox