[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network
Join Our eMail List
Email:

Photobucket

Clinton Putting Resources Into California

by: Julia Rosen

Tue May 29, 2007 at 15:11:50 PM PDT


(cross-posted from Working Californians)

Hillary Clinton is staffing up here in California and laying down the groundwork for an absentee voter program. Last week a Clinton strategic memo dominated a spin cycle, because it advocated ignoring Iowa in favor of spending more time and resources in more populous states holding their primaries right after. Part of the reasoning was based on the ability to run early voting campaigns in those states, something I addressed last week.

Julia Rosen :: Clinton Putting Resources Into California
"Iowans will not be the first to vote," Mr. Henry wrote in his memorandum. "Hundreds of thousands of voters will be voting in California, Florida and Texas. We must fund an expensive paid communications and a vote by mail/early vote program in these mega-states.

Indeed it looks like she is doing just that. While tomorrow's big announcement is the endorsement of Mayor Villaraigosa, it is rivaled in significance with the staffing announcement she released a few days ago. She now has a State Director, Political Director, Communications Director, Field Director and Deputy Field Director all in California. They have extensive history working in California, especially down in LA.

Here is my prediction on how she will run her California campaign. It will be a very top down coordinated campaign that relies heavily on voter files to drive in early votes. She has locked up the two highest profile Latinos in the state and will use them as surrogates on her behalf. It is unlikely that she will garner many endorsements from grassroots organizations or labor. This will require her to lean more heavily on the elected officials who have endorsed her. Targeted voters will receive glossy mailers and phone calls. She will likely go up on both radio and do some limited (relatively speaking) television. The grassroots organizing will be limited but still present. They will in short, implement proven methods of turning out the vote in California, with a heavy emphasis on vote rich LA.

This strategy will mean she has hundreds of thousands of votes in the bank before Iowa even votes. Something experts don't seem to quite get yet.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Any idea about other campaigns? (0.00 / 0)
I can't imagine that the other campaigns are going to sit idly by.  Presumably, we'll see major on-the-ground efforts by the Obama and (perhaps Edwards) in ramping up in the next month or so.

Anybody have actual details yet?

A Rough & Tumble reader.


Most (8.00 / 1)
recent information I have is that Obama has hired a national consulting firm in Pasadena and has a fundraiser.  Edwards has fundraising personnel but no other staff.  Hillary's is much most substantial at this point in time than the rest of the campaigns.

I am not sure about Richardson.


[ Parent ]
That firm... (0.00 / 0)
I think that the firm you're talking about is The Strategy Group.

Larry Grisolano runs the Pasadena office, but the firm started in Chicago.  They do great mail, as well as the gamut of other consulting.  If I'm not mistaken, they go back with Obama to his Senate campaign - maybe earlier.


[ Parent ]
Ah (0.00 / 0)
Larry Grisolano, know him from his work on the Alliance.  He knows his stuff.

[ Parent ]
She has to rely on SoCal (0.00 / 0)
She's been practically radioactive among NorCal progressives and Obama has been working this region very hard. It should be an interesting outcome.

LA (0.00 / 0)
has the votes.  Just look at the voter registration stats for each county.

SF 418,567
Sac 612,407
SD 1,351,664
LA 3,945,640


[ Parent ]
Other Bay Area cities (0.00 / 0)
San Francisco is in fact the smallest of the major Bay Area cities.  San Jose and Oakland are both larger.  Presumably any attempt to use the Bay Area as a counter to LA would involve organizing over a larger geographic area.

A Rough & Tumble reader.

[ Parent ]
The counties are larger (8.00 / 1)
Oakland has 180,012 registered voters, but Alameda has 671,791. 

San Jose has 335,584, but Santa Clara 685,048.

You are right.  The Bay Area can be organized to counter LA County, just in terms of sheer numbers.  It's not just about one city.


[ Parent ]
labor (0.00 / 0)
obviously whoever garners the big labor vote will use those resources.  I would imagine that Villaraigosa and Nunez may try to sway labor to Hillary's side or at least get them to stay neutral.  If the Labor Fed goes with, say, Edwards, he'll be competitive on the ground.

In the Latino community, Richardson is racking up endorsements that may seem less impressive, but may have more resonance on the ground (Gloria Molina in particular).

Your analysis is spot-on.


You are right (0.00 / 0)
Richardson should undercut Clinton's efforts with Latinos to some extent.  It depends on how much time he spends out here.  Early indications hint that it will be pretty significant.  He did declare out here after all.

Labor is a big important wildcard.  The LA Labor Fed one of several cherry endorsements.  Nunez and Villaraigosa both have very strong ties with labor, both working directly for unions at various points in their careers.  However, on the issues she just does not match up very well with what they want in a candidate.


[ Parent ]
AV's ties with labor (0.00 / 0)
aren't what they used to be, given the school board/teacher's union fight.  My sense is that nobody's saying anything publicly, but there are hurt feelings.  Happy to be wrong.

[ Parent ]
Yes (0.00 / 0)
He cashed in a lot of favors with that effort, all for naught.  AV is not what he used to be in general.

[ Parent ]
On the Ground in the IE (0.00 / 0)
In this corner of the state, we have a number of active Obama groups (three [!] in  Riverside alone), and a reasonably-sized Edwards group. There has been NO, nada, zilch grass-roots activity on Clinton's behalf here.

Richardson looks like he is gearing up to get a grass-roots operation going, but I think that bus has pulled out of the station.

Interestingly, one of the Obama organizers here is a recovering Republican.

I'm not detecting much enthusiasm for Clinton in these parts.


Also... (0.00 / 0)
June 9th is a massive grass-roots rollout for the Obama campaign. Walk for Change/National Canvass Day.

[ Parent ]
Clinton will "win" CA (0.00 / 0)
I have no doubt that she will takr the plurality in CA. What I think Obama should hope for is to come in a close second with a butt-load of delegates that will go with it.

Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads
Photobucket


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox