[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network
Join Our eMail List
Email:

Photobucket

Big Oil Buying Sacramento One Legislator At A Time

by: David Dayen

Mon May 14, 2007 at 13:55:14 PM PDT


Jamie Court and Judy Dugan of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights pen an extremely troubling piece today about Big Oil, particularly Chevron, outright buying our government and its leaders.  This is not limited to Republicans, but certainly the Governor is the biggest recipient of this largesse.

Take Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who once claimed that he was so rich he did not need anyone else's money - and who isn't running for another office. Yet as gasoline prices were breaking last year's record of $3.38 a gallon, Schwarzenegger collected a $100,000 check May 1 from Chevron, the West's largest refiner. The company certainly had the cash on hand. Just three days earlier, it reported a $4.7-billion first-quarter profit, up 18% over the same period last year.

The contribution brought Schwarzenegger's take from Chevron to $665,000 (making it his 15th largest donor) since 2003, and his total political tribute from the energy industry is now $4 million. According to a recent Schwarzenegger fundraising solicitation, Chevron's $100,000 buys the company special briefings with the governor, something that beleaguered motorists aren't getting.

In all, oil companies delivered $90 MILLION dollars to political campaigns and parties in 2006, and while a lot of that went to block the corporate tax-for-alternative energy Prop. 87, plenty was spread around to political leaders and parties.  And that seed money ensures that there is no investigation into practices like this (over):

David Dayen :: Big Oil Buying Sacramento One Legislator At A Time
Like power plant owners during California's 2001 electricity crisis, refiners such as Chevron have discovered that they can make more money by producing less gasoline. So they do. They have, over more than 20 years, deliberately reduced their capacity until they can barely meet California's needs under the best of circumstances. Industry spokesmen defend this as efficiency. But there is no slack in the production system, which shorts the market and raises prices.

Any planned or unplanned refinery outage, pipeline break or power failure causes prices to jump.

Take the case of a possum and a raccoon that, in March, bit through power substation lines feeding two refineries in the South Bay. The critters expired, but the outage caused a 7-cent jump in local wholesale gasoline prices. The cost of refining gasoline is stable over time, so these price spikes equal pure profit for Chevron and Co [...]

Chevron refined 22% less oil in the U.S. during the first quarter of this year than in the same quarter of 2006 because of longer "planned maintenance" downtime and accidents. Yet its total profit on U.S. refining increased 66%. Making less gasoline, it made much more money.

Last week, the CDP took $50,000 from Chevron.  Court and Dugan also detail a junket that Schwarzenegger chief of staff Susan Kennedy took with Speaker Fabian Nuñez in Rio, a 12-day conference paid for by Chevron and other oil interests.

During the 12-day conference, Chevron's lobbyist got an entire day on the official agenda, which the public knows about only because of our Public Records Act request. Nuñez, who last year was highly critical of oil companies, seems to have nothing to say this year.

The FTCR have a long track record detailing this kind of takeover of our government.  And we all know about the inordinate power that corporate interests have in Sacramento.  This editorial makes it plain, and it's really shocking to see it so starkly. 

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Isnt it amazing (8.00 / 1)
that $665,000 only gets you to 15th on Arnold's all-time highest donor list?

Saw that this morning (5.00 / 1)
And it's a shame. At a time when California needs to get extremely serious about planning a statewide effort to move away from oil-based systems of transportation, where virtually everybody is fed up with the ever-rising cost of gas, the oil companies are pulling out all the stops to prevent the state from providing that serious effort to construct alternatives.

What else would explain this lobbying blitz? They're scared, and they ought to be. If California, the state that cheap oil built, turns on them, the rest of the nation will follow.

If we have to fight the state Democratic establishment on this, so be it; the time to take on the oil companies, clean up our environment, and get the state off of its cheap oil addiction has long since passed. Let's make sure that big oil has wasted its money with this lobbying effort.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


Wonder why Demos won't get behind HSR for real? $50,000 from Chevron maybe? (0.00 / 0)
I've been warned about this by Sacramento staffers "off the record." The oil companies are buying Democratic legislators just like they are the Gov.

That's why you get "High Speed Rail is a great idea, and the future, and we will really need it in twenty years, BUT.... We need to make priorities..." the eyes lose focus and they probably start thinking about that $50,000 and their piece of the action.

Then they say "How about something cheap and slow that 3% of the population would ride?" After all Chevron can lose 3% if they get to sell fuel to the other 90%+.

I is very discouraging but what do we do about it? Ideas?


[ Parent ]
It Ain't So (0.00 / 0)
This is Steve Maviglio from the Speaker's Office

The op-ed is inaccurate on several fronts.

First, there's the underlying assumption that when a donor contributes to their campaign they get something in return. As everyone who has contributed to Act Blue and other candidates knows, that just ain't so.

For example, Speaker Nunez introduced legislation last year that would prevent price gouging by the oil companies. And this week, he'll unveil some tougher legislation that won't make the oil companies happy either.

The FTCR is on solid ground on pointing out the crisis, and legislators in Sacramento will do what they can. Keep your eyes peeled.


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads
Photobucket


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox