[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network
Join Our eMail List
Email:

Photobucket

The Republicans Debate (and John Edwards wants in)

by: Todd Beeton

Thu May 03, 2007 at 16:51:34 PM PDT


The Republican candidates for president are in Simi Valley, CA at the Reagan library today for the first Republican debate of the 2008 presidential season. And while the location has more to do with the conservative icon whose library is playing host than the fact that it's in California, we at ATMWatch will be watching for references to California's primary and the issues Californians care about.

The debate will start at 5pm PDT (webcast available HERE) and is co-sponsored by MSNBC and politico.com, which asked people to submit questions online to be asked of the candidates during the debate, much as we are asking regular voters for questions to ask the candidates HERE. We're getting your questions to the campaigns and we'll have our first candidate response video next week.

Now, while we're used to asking candidates questions, we're not so used to candidates asking other candidates questions but that's exactly what John Edwards has done in advance of tonight's debate. His question for the Republican candidates:

"Has the Bush doctrine of a Global War on Terror backfired? Does the president's focus suggest a fixed enemy that can be defeated through a permanent military campaign or do you think we need a broader approach as many military leaders believe?"

1/3 of tonight's debate will be devoted to answering questions submitted online and will be voted on by readers. Hopefully we'll be able to rate Edwards's question up so it gets asked. Would love to hear them defend Bush's war strategy or even claim with a straight face that  there is one. Consider this an open thread.

Todd Beeton :: The Republicans Debate (and John Edwards wants in)
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
This should be interesting (0.00 / 0)
speaking of terror and Edwards.  I hear a box of white powder was just intercepted in the post office, intended for delivery to his campaign headquarters.

Interesting decision by Arnold to decline a speaking role and instead just sit next to Nancy Reagan.


Interesting tidbit... (0.00 / 0)
"Like most Republicans, I don't have a favorite in the presidential race.  Above all else, I'm looking for a president who will respect our Constitution and defend our nation's borders - in short, precisely the opposite of George W. Bush." - Tom McClintock

I'd vote for any of them over Kucinich and Gravel. My two favorites are Huckabee and Paul. Huckabee because he lets his views decide the party he's in, not the other way around. Paul for obvious reasons. I won't rule out voting for either of them in the general, depending on who the Democrat is

The Silent Consensus


Rudy (0.00 / 0)
needed to put some anti-shine on his head.  That sucker is gleaming.

interesting question (0.00 / 0)
"How do we win the war on terror when terrorists are so easily replaced?"

So far Matthews is better than Williams although this "multi-candidate appearance" as I heard these "debates" referred to on NPR last night has a similarly chaotic format to the Dem debate. is there any rhyme or reason?


over at politico.com... (0.00 / 0)
Over at Politico.com go vote for this question for Brownback:

Did you vote for the Patriot Act and did you read the whole thing before voting?


Wow (0.00 / 0)
is McCain is a complete suck up.

Ron Paul... (0.00 / 0)
is the one anti-war guy up there. he may actually get some traction for that.

and Giuliani actually went so far as to say it would be ok if a strict constructionist judge did not repeal Roe V Wade but rather upheld it as precedent. Wow.


Matthews has lost control (0.00 / 0)
These guys are just answering whatever question they want.

just so you know (0.00 / 0)
30% of the Republican field doesn't believe in evolution.  You have to pause the question on TiVo, but Tancredo, Brownback and Huckabee (nice pick viking) raised their hand.  Wow.  I hope they are never treated with penicillin.

In other exciting news, Tommy Thompson thinks it's OK for a company not to hire a gay employee just because he's gay.


dday... (0.00 / 0)
I didn't know he didn't believe in Evolution. Looking on the bright side, he gave a great justification for protecting the environment, which is what every religious-righter needs to hear. Except for Giuliani, they all believe life begins at conception (I happen to be pro-choice), but unlike the rest of them...

Huckabee realizes life doesn't end at birth, and pro-lifers need to be concerned about more than just the gestation. He cares about quality of the environment, education, and health care. He's the only pro-life one on the stage, the rest (except Giuliani) are just anti-choice.

Further, I'll say it again: he stands on principle, and never deviates from those principles. He lets his views determine the party he's in, just like I do. He doesn't put his finger out and see which way the wind blows

You probably don't have to worry about me voting for him in the general, unless it's Kucinich or Gravel as his opponent.

Brownback also has some new weight, since he's the only one there to support Biden's plan for Iraq: www.planforiraq.com

The Silent Consensus


[ Parent ]
though... (0.00 / 0)
don't misread me, I did not mean to imply I'd vote for Brownback in the general either, assuming it's not one of those two I mentioned

The Silent Consensus

[ Parent ]
Non-negotiable (0.00 / 0)
Not believing in evolution is like not believing in gravity.  Anyone pig-ignorant enough to either have that belief, or pander to the far-right base to make them think you believe it, isn't fit to teach middle-school science, let alone lead the country.


[ Parent ]
But...But... (0.00 / 0)
Gravity is the law. Evolution is just a theory.  Law and order. Sound science. :P

I'm proud to work for Barbara Boxer

[ Parent ]
No... (0.00 / 0)
I resent you using the word "just." A theory is more than a belief, it is a well-tested hypothesis. Creationism and Intelligent Design are just a belief.

dday, I do think you have a point. However, I think those who don't believe in thermal death are a bigger problem. He is willing to do something about thermal death, unlike some other Republicans

The Silent Consensus


[ Parent ]
Sarcasm. n/t (0.00 / 0)


I'm proud to work for Barbara Boxer

[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads
Photobucket


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox