[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally

MBA Member

Blue CA Ad Network
Join Our eMail List
Email:

Photobucket

Kevin Lawlor Caught in a Lie?

by: Bob Brigham

Mon Jan 22, 2007 at 16:09:32 PM PST


With all the heat, Ellen Tauscher's press secretary Kevin Lawlor when on record and said, "her 63 New Dem colleagues were in lock-step with Speaker Pelosi and the Democratic Leadership throughout the first 100 hours". The problem is, this isn't true. For example the 6 for '06 agenda for the first 100 hours had the item to end subsidies for big oil and invest in renewable energy. Congressman John Barrow voted against leadership and according to Tauscher's own website he is one of those 63 NDC colleagues. Is anyone suprised a NDC member sided with big oil? Is anyone suprised Kevin Lawlor tried to cover it up with what appears to be a blatant lie to the press?

UPDATE: Josh Richman has another find:

And, from my own research, I now see that New Democrat Mike McIntyre, D-N.C., was among 16 Democrats opposing H.R. 3, the bill to expand stem-cell research.

Flack Checked.

UPDATE II: The A.P. is now running the exact same quote.

Bob Brigham :: Kevin Lawlor Caught in a Lie?
UPDATE III: To put this in context, 1/3 of the Democratic Party 100 hour agenda passed despite the fact NDC members weren't in lockstep with the leadership.
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
maybe he was misquoted (0.00 / 0)
Maybe instead of 'throughout' he really said 'threw out'.

;)


Overreaction (1.00 / 1)
Congratulations on winning this insignificant game of gotcha. Ah, the powers of the internet!

This is hardly a lie. At worst it is a small overstatement.

So far you have two examples -- out of a possible 378 -- of votes against the 6 for '06 agenda.

By any reasonable political standard (even if you find a few more unfortunate votes) this is pretty "lockstep." Especially for Democrats!

BTW: What was Rep. Tauscher's voting record? She was six-for-six in support of the leadership.


[ Parent ]
no, he lied to the AP and Oakland Tribune (0.00 / 0)
1/3 of the 100 hour agenda passed without the NDC types being in lockstep.

He is unbelievable, reporters need to fact check every thing he says.


[ Parent ]
Your Little World (0.00 / 0)
It must be a lovely absolutist world in which you live. But going around the blogosphere calling this statement a "lie" does not make your spin true.

I suppose I should be happy, though. Rather than resorting to your previous tactic of calling someone with which you disagree "retarded," this time you merely rated my serious comment "trollish".

Progress on the internets is sometimes subtle.


[ Parent ]
It was an absolutist statement and a lie (0.00 / 0)
It is important for journalists to know that Kevin Lawlor can be trusted about to the same degree that Katie Merrill understands the internet.

[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads
Photobucket


Support Calitics:

Shop on Amazon.com

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Powered by: SoapBlox