Consumer Watchdog Wednesday called on the Federal Trade Commission to ask Congress to pass Do Not Track legislation because "the self-regulatory effort to design Do Not Track is virtually dead in the water."
In a letter to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz John M. Simpson, the nonpartisan nonprofit public interest group's Privacy Project Director wrote:
"Almost a year ago with great fanfare in the media you said a Do Not Track mechanism would be in place by the end of last year. You and you colleagues opted to rely on a self-regulatory process to implement Do Not Track, but alluded to the possibility of legislation if that process failed. Not surprisingly the self-regulatory effort to design Do Not Track is virtually dead in the water. After a year nothing has changed for the consumer. You tried to use the bully pulpit, but the advertising industry did not heed your call. The time for words has passed; if you expect Do Not Track to be implemented, the Commission must endorse Do Not Track legislation now."
Read Consumer Watchdog's letter here
"As the Commission advocated in its report, Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change, a Do Not Track mechanism would offer people control over whether data about them was collected," Simpson wrote.
Consumer Watchdog noted that the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), an Internet standards setting organization, has been trying to develop specifications about how the Do Not Track message would be sent and what the obligations would be for a website that receives it. "Talks have dragged on more than a year with weekly conference calls and six face-to-face meetings, while the W3C's Tracking Protection Working Group has grown to 102 members," Simpson wrote. "Another round of meetings is scheduled next month. Talks can at best be charitably described as stalled."
"You and the Commission repeatedly put faith in self-regulatory efforts and predicted that a Do Not Track mechanism would be in place by the end of the year," Simpson wrote. "Unfortunately that optimism has proved to be unwarranted."
The letter concluded:
"The end of the year as passed. Your words have gone largely unheeded by the advertising industry. The bully pulpit has not brought about a Do Not Track standard. Lest your words be taken as empty threats and given the logjam in the World Wide Web Consortium process, the time for decisive action by the FTC has arrived. Sen. Jay Rockefeller, (D-WV) introduced a Do Not Track bill in the last session of Congress. We understand he intends to re-introduce the bill this session. We call on you and the entire Commission to endorse the urgent need for Do Not Track legislation. If nothing else, the threat of legislation could be the stick that prompts a recalcitrant advertising industry to stop its foot dragging and re-engage in real negotiations."
The letter cited numerous times that Leibowitz had predicted the implementation of Do Not Track by the end of last year and raised the possibility of legislation if the effort failed. For instance, the letter noted:
"'We are definitely at a critical point in whether folks will be able to come together and develop a real Do Not Track option for consumers,' you told Politico in October. You said the lack of consensus was 'encouraging the possibility of legislation -- maybe not today, maybe not in the lame duck, but soon.' You also told The New York Times, 'It is time to drop some of the bluster and work toward compromise.'
"In November you used the bully pulpit again to tell Politico, 'If by the end of the year or early next year, we haven't seen a real Do Not Track option for consumers, I suspect the commission will go back and think about whether we want to endorse legislation.' "