[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

CA-10: DeSaulnier's Endorsement Trouble

by: David Dayen

Mon Aug 03, 2009 at 11:00:00 AM PDT


Sen. Mark DeSaulnier has based a lot of his campaign strategy in the quick-sprint Congressional race for CA-10 on endorsements.  Not a day goes by when he doesn't release some endorsement by one character or another into my inbox.  The other day he touted that he received a "majority of endorsement votes" from California Democratic Party delegates at their endorsement meeting over the weekend, without mentioning that he did not reach the 60% threshold that would be required for an official CDP endorsement.

However, one endorsement has caused DeSaulnier a bit of a headache - the support of the former holder of this seat, Ellen Tauscher.  DeSaulnier has made no secret of that endorsement, including it in mailers and on his TV advertisement.  One problem with all this: with Tauscher now at the State Department, some have raised concerns that her endorsement while working at a federal agency violates the Hatch Act, which prohibits executive branch employees from participating in partisan politics.  DeSaulnier's camp has countered that the endorsement, which was made before Tauscher was confirmed for the post at State, always says "Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher" and thus indicates that it was made prior to that appointment.  But the State Department has weighed in, asking DeSaulnier's campaign to remove the endorsement.

The U.S. State Department has asked 10th District Congressional candidate and state Sen. Mark DeSaulnier to remove all references in his campaign materials to his endorsement from former congresswoman Ellen Tauscher, who is now undersecretary for Arms Control and International Security at the U.S. State Department.

While a legal adviser to the U.S. State Department concludes that the endorsement broke no laws or policies, "Under Secretary Tauscher is committed to the highest standards of ethical conduct. To avoid even the appearance of impropriety, on behalf of Undersecretary Tauscher, I have asked Senator DeSaulnier to remove all references in his campaign material of any endorsement she may have made," wrote James Thessin, deputy legal adviser and designed agency ethics official.

The DeSaulnier campaign is fingering John Garamendi for complaining to the State Department about the use of Tauscher's name.  Actually, the complaint was made by Jason Bezis, an individual who claims not to be affiliated with any campaign, but who apparently enjoys filing complaints with the State Department and the FEC (he filed one there against DeSaulnier's campaign over a health care mailer).  It looks like the DeSaulnier campaign won't change current materials already printed, but will consult the State Department "about what qualifies and what doesn't under their request."

I actually question whether this means as much as the DeSaulnier team seems to think, but their strategy all along has been to gather up local endorsements.

David Dayen :: CA-10: DeSaulnier's Endorsement Trouble
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Has Mark Done A Poll Which Shows Him Leading? (0.00 / 0)
This should mean something to his campaign. I suspect that Mark has done a poll and knows that he is trailing and therefore will not release it. I also suspect that all those who endorsed him or who have given $ are largely unaware that he is not leading and is on track to garner the red ribbon not the blue one. He should have had the CDP endorsement locked down weeks ago... BUT SHOCKINGLY HE DIDN'T ...this is also a very bad omen of things to come.  Pls advise if anyone is aware of a recent credible poll by his campaign....it is very odd that I have not seen one from the campaign of the anointed front runner.  

You are reading it wrong. (2.00 / 1)
DeSaulnier trails badly in all polls behind Garamendi because there are some places in the district he has never run before.   Joan Buchanan has the same problem.  However DeSaulnier polls well in the areas where voters know him.

His campaign strategy therefore is based on the idea that he can overtake the frontrunners partly by introducing himself to the rest of the district and adding to his total there, but mostly by stressing that prominent and popular elected officials who have worked closely with all of the candidates think he is the best choice.  His pitch to voters is that they have a lot of good alternatives, but that the people who know all of the candidates, including members of most political factions in the area by and large think he is the best choice.

Buchanan on the other hand is going in a different direction and is clearly hoping for the fresh face and needing a woman in Washington to carry her over the top.  Both candidates have decent strategies and I think most outsiders think a reasonable chance of pulling it off, which is why you don't see many of the major players in Washington taking a stand for any of the three at the moment.  A lot of it will depend on GOTV.  

However both candidates trail Garamendi by a lot right now because he is well known and liked by the casual voters.  People in that district would be perfectly fine with John Garamendi as their Congressman and the other two are having to work hard to make their case.

For DeSaulnier, the loss of Tauscher's name is huge, no matter how it plays out.  He can either continue to use her name as he would have originally planned on doing, hiding behind the obvious fiction that the literature was already printed and the TV spots were already in the can.  The problem is that most voters won't buy that and it will raise questions about his credibility, so he will need to balance that with the advantage of using Tauscher's name or he can stop using it which means that not only does he lose a prominent supporters name, he also loses someone who balances with George Miller to make it clear that leaders from all political factions have endorsed him.  It's a tough blow.  Not critical, but a blow nonetheless.


[ Parent ]
Funny Thing Is... (0.00 / 0)
Most activists (who are about the only people paying attention at this point) know that the party's endorsement process doesn't represent a true expression of popular opinion.  Even in a normal year, it represents the opinion of delegates to the state convention from the area, and this year not even that.  It's common knowledge that all three major candidates gamed the system, getting their fellow electeds around the state to appoint supporters on CD 10 as their delegates for this one meeting.  Desaulnier knew the rules as well as anyone, and tried his best, but he couldn't reach the goal line.  Sure seems to slow the bandwagon a bit.

So let me get this straight (0.00 / 0)
Several days in the news cycle reminding voters about Tauscher's endorsement is a bad thing? Controversy makes news, and at the end of the day voters are reminded about the endorsement, not about whether the State Department thinks its kosher.

Not sure I made a value judgment (0.00 / 0)
I will say that the universe of people voting in a special election is probably more of your activist class, and the Miller endorsement is probably more meaningful than the Tauscher one. Obviously someone has an endorsement strategy and we'll see if they're right, but the endorsements that matter are the ones that put boots on the ground.

[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox