[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Holding Our Elected Officials Accountable

by: David Dayen

Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 12:23:57 PM PDT


California's system of government is designed to produce bad outcomes, no question about it.  But that does not let Democratic lawmakers off the hook for their actions.  The process denies the ability to budget in a sane manner, but nobody put a gun to their head and forced them to sign on to a budget that rips the social safety net to shreds.  If progressive Democrats in the legislature were willing to say no a little more, they might gain a measure of respectability and have at least some of their demands met.

The problem is that it's very difficult to get a bead on who votes for and against a budget, given the state's process.  There were 26 different budget trailer bills, and lawmakers had the opportunity to pick and choose where to take stands.  Progressive activists need that information of who voted on what in order to make choices about their representatives.  It's not the sum total of the equation - leadership can cut deals with individual lawmakers to vote no on trailer bills where their vote is not needed for passage and yes on others, and there's all manner of horse-trading that goes on.  But in the end, all we have are the votes.  And so we can judge our elected officials based on what votes they made.

Marty Omoto has helpfully strung together all the votes on the main budget bill and key trailer bills, and he will follow this up in subsequent posts.  Have a look.  Hone in on your representative.  Did they vote in your interests?  Did they take any notable stands?  Or did they go along with the leadership?  If so, is there any need for them to participate in the Legislature, or couldn't a lever pulled by the leadership work just as well?

I'm going to look at my two lawmakers, on the flip.  By the way, I also have a list of all Assembly votes on almost all the budget trailer bills, ping me if you want a copy.

David Dayen :: Holding Our Elected Officials Accountable
For the time being, I live in the 41st Assembly District and the 23rd Senate District.  My lawmakers are Julia Brownley and Fran Pavley.  How'd they vote?

Brownley voted yes on every single budget bill except for four based on my records: AB X4 7, AB X4 8, AB X4 19 and AB X4 23.  AB 7 (for short) privatized the social services enrollment process.  AB 8 instituted so-called "anti-fraud" provisions to CalWorks to reduce or limit eligibility, and eliminated cost of living adjustments to the welfare program. AB 19 dealt with in-home support services (IHSS) in a similar way as CalWorks, adding fingerprinting and background checks and other anti-fraud measures.  AB23 was the Tranquillon Ridge offshore drilling deal.

So basically, Brownley objected to the policy changes made to human services programs but voted with the leadership on pretty much all the program cuts.

As for Pavley, she voted against AB 7 (privatizing social services enrollment), AB 8 (anti-fraud changes to CalWorks), AB X4 9 (cuts on spending to developmental services like Early Start), AB 19 (the aforementioned IHSS bill) and AB23 (Tranquillon Ridge).  She also voted against AB27, the use of redevelopment funds by the state.  Everything else was a yes.

I think if you go through the votes, with rare exceptions you will see this as the norm for Democratic legislators - picking a few issues, usually on issues where their votes were not needed, to draw a line in the sand, but being generally not too troublesome and following leadership.

In general I think Julia and Fran are solid legislators, but I think it's reasonable to ask whether that's good enough.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Foster City: Jerry Hill and Leland Yee (0.00 / 0)
Based on Marty Omoto's posting, Jerry Hill should get a primary challenge but Leland Yee deserves our thanks.

Of course (0.00 / 0)
Most of the legislators face no real challenge to reelection. Their challenge is to figure out what to do next. In order to move from the Assembly to the Senate, or from the Senate to some state-wide office, you have to keep the leadership happy or they'll support someone else in the primary.

This is what one of the million things the geniuses who brought us term limits didn't think through.

If you knew you were losing your job in a few years and needed your boss's help to get new one, you would try to please him too, wouldn't you?

Term limits must be eliminated. Districts must be redrawn, and Legislators should be compelled to do their job by voting on tough issues instead of punting to the initiative process.


Here's a thought (0.00 / 0)
Instead of beating up the progressive legislators who did the best job they could, how about focusing on Republicans -- recruiting candidates to run against them, organizing in their districts, and raising funds to defeat them.  

clap louder! (0.00 / 0)
I have this funny notion that votes matter.

And this is the typical Steve Maviglio attack on individual blog posts while ignoring the effort over a number of years to focus, organize, recruit, fundraise and advocate for Democrats in swing districts.  There's only one group who failed in that respect in 2006 and 2008 - consultants like Steve Maviglio.


[ Parent ]
I don't think they are mutually exclusive...... (0.00 / 0)
(holding Dems accountable and targeting Republicans). Dems need to be able to defend their votes to their constituents(including the Democratic activists in those districts). While giving some leeway for the district and its political demographics(not all are like Mark leno's or John Perez's), having a D after your name should stand for something. Most political activists have the discipline and maturity to not single out one or even a few votes to draw their line in the sand and a labor union may see perfection quite differently than a coastal environmentalist. . But electeds need to be accountable, and some of these vetoes are ones that there should be vigorous Democratic whip efforts.

There are a number of Republican seats that you and others have noted could be in play. These are difficult elections to say the least and certainly a factor why Steve and other consultants don't jump at the chance to run those campaigns. But some activists also would rather go after the low lying fruit of Democratic legislators who don't--what was it some poster here described it --pull the lever(in this case a progressive lever)-instead of trying the much harder task of winning over a toss up seat. Both reactions are understandable----payoff better in a Democratic seat. But until the 2/3 issue is behind us--which may not be for many moons---those toss up seats are important too.


[ Parent ]
don't disagree with a word of this (0.00 / 0)
You might be interested in knowing that John Perez voted for every budget bill - every single one of them - including the changes to CalWorks and IHSS and local government raids.  All of them.

I think that's useful information for his constituents.


[ Parent ]
Another lame attempt at personal character assassination (0.00 / 0)
I did quite well in those years, as did my candidates, thank you very much. And as much as you like to look in the rear view mirror (where, in fact, you were largely absent), I was talking about looking forward.

These continued attacks on progressive Democrats make little sense. You think Legislative Democrats like doing this? The simple fact is they don't hold the cards because of the 2/3 rule and a Republican governor. To suggest that they don't have to compromise is absurd and reflects a total lack of understanding of how government works.  


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox