[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Why does California have a Senate?

by: tatere

Wed Jul 22, 2009 at 10:59:56 AM PDT


Does it serve some purpose? Four year terms aren't so very much longer than two. They don't represent counties anymore. Just because the Feds have a Senate (in all its splendor) isn't much of a reason for us to have one.

I'd trade it in for term limits. You can be re-elected as many times as your district wants to vote for you but you have to run every two years.

Or, even more blue-sky: Increase the size of the Assembly and make the new 40 seats statewide party list seats. If you get 2.5% of the vote, you get a seat. Or some such arrangement, maybe not statewide. But the two major state parties are such failures, I think it'd be good to get some wild cards in there.

tatere :: Why does California have a Senate?
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
One of the goals of a Constititutional Convention (0.00 / 0)
Is a unicameral legislature with smaller districts and more representatives.

New America Foundation has a nice proposal for a mixed legislature with some elected from districts and others elected from eight regions with proportional representation.

OC Progressive is Gus Ayer, former Fountain Valley Council member.  


glad to hear it (0.00 / 0)
glad to hear that this is an idea that is already floating around. that sounds about right. you want your local rep for constituent services, and your party rep for political representation.

the effect of some kind of regional proportional representation on the two major parties alone would be interesting. i'd sure hate to be a Republican in San Francisco, for instance. not only would i have zero chance of electing someone i agree with, but (at least some of) my views also have very little representation by anyone in my party in Sacto. changing that seems like it would stir up the political dynamics quite a bit.


[ Parent ]
Yes! (0.00 / 0)
I agree with everything you're saying, and I have thought about this a lot.

Nebraska, iirc, is a unicameral state.

I think sectional interests in California (i.e. north vs. south; coast vs. inland) might necessitate some body elected along geographical lines, but in general, I think a proportionately elected house with many more members (so that we might actually know who they are) is a great idea.


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox