[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Water Situation Looking Worse in the San Joaquin Valley

by: Brian Leubitz

Tue Jul 14, 2009 at 08:00:00 AM PDT


Water is at the heart of the Central Valley's daily life, and the southern part of that, the San Joaquin Valley, is always desperately looking for water.  In the middle of the century, the SJ Valley received a bunch of water from the feds and a few state water projects. That allowed the groundwater to work its way back, but the last 45 years have been bad as the water projects have gradually drawn water away from the agricultural purposes and to fishing and urban water priorities.

The result was a process of tapping ground water, leaving the Valley to slowly sink. And since 1961, the results have been quite severe:

California's San Joaquin Valley has lost 60 million acre-feet of groundwater since 1961, according to a new federal study. That's enough water for 60 Folsom reservoirs.
*  *  *
According to the study, groundwater pumping continues to cause the valley floor to sink, a problem known as subsidence. This threatens the stability of surface structures such as the California Aqueduct, which delivers drinking water to more than 20 million people.
* * *
One consequence has been land subsidence over vast areas of the San Joaquin Valley. The most severe drop is about 29 feet near Mendota, which occurred before the canals were built, said Al Steele, an engineering geologist at the state Department of Water Resources in Fresno. (SacBee 7/13/09)

Of course, if the Aqueduct goes, at least the South of the state will begin to pay a lot more attention to the issue.  Much of the water for SoCal comes directly through the Aqueduct.

Our use of resources over the last half century has left in a very poor position to deal with our current drought. Unless we get some rain or come up with some solutions, the future of farming, and of life in general, in the Central Valley looks increasingly bleak.  

Brian Leubitz :: Water Situation Looking Worse in the San Joaquin Valley
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I feel for the farmworkers here... (4.00 / 1)
but this is one place where my social Darwinism instincts kick in.  The west side of the San Joaquin Valley (Mendota area) has been an artificial agriculture for years.  It was largely developed through federal corporate welfare, and without massive continued federal handouts, it's going to die.  Most days I'm inclined to say "let it die."

Yes, although as a Southern Californian (0.00 / 0)
I also have to remember that this many people aren't supposed to live in the semi-desert, and so the same logic could apply to us.  Not a platform to run on!

[ Parent ]
Yep (4.00 / 1)
really, living in the vast majority of places has required some engineering, etc. for a really long time. Few places have direct access to every resource needed.  

Of course, water is and will remain the most difficult of these. And farming in the southern San Joaquin may simply become too difficult a thing to be worthwhile, in the long run -- which means massive displacement of workers in the central valley. If it can't be avoided (and I suspect that it can't, really), I do have to say that I hope we put social programs into place to help these folks find other places or ways to live and work.  


[ Parent ]
Agreed, with a major caveat (5.00 / 1)
Residential use is 15-20% of Cal's water, and agriculture is 80-85% (I know I'm missing some others in there somewhere).   It's been a while since I was a water geek and I don't know how much agricultural use of water is considered "sustainable."  I think that as between those hard choices, it will come down to a lot more food and a lot fewer people, or somewhat less food and more people (which will ultimately result in fewer people).  

[ Parent ]
Water (0.00 / 0)
Remember this article when Arnold says he wants to pump Sacramento Valley Groundwater for export or for substitution for diverted surface water,

A very thoughtful post...... (0.00 / 0)
water for agriculture(which impacts not only farmers and  farmworkers but everyone in the state) usually isn't on the front page of most progressive blogs. But the reality is that our Central Valley is truly a disaster area because of the drought and the failure of Sacramento and Washington D.C. to effectively deal with this and related water use issues.

I don't think we can afford to let agriculture in the breadbasket of the state die with the same attitude that Bush and mcCain had with our manufacturing base in the U.S.
Enough agricultural land is lost to housing that we can't afford to let more of it go offshore, creating greater carbon footprint, health and national security issues.

There aren't any easy answers, especialy with global warming, but people in leadership need to take the bit between their teeth and deal with this before its too late.


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox