[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Steinberg: 2/3 Is the Cause of The Entire Problem

by: Brian Leubitz

Wed Jul 01, 2009 at 17:52:28 PM PDT


Dave mentioned a bit of what Sen. Steinberg said last night, but I thought this was worth while video.

In the end, we learn a few things. First, that Arnold was negotiating in bad faith.  He refused to budge, and then piled on additional grand policy changes.

But, Steinberg starts out with 2/3. It's worth transcribing...even if I miss a few things.

The 2/3 requirement that we have in this state. I know it's a tired old saw. But when you really think about, that is the cause of so much of the dysfunction in the legislature. you have a minority party that obviously worked in tandem with the governor that cost the state 6-7 billion dollars tonight for no good reason. To somehow improve your negotiating position. It is without question the most irresponsible act that I have seen in my 15 years of public service...I hope that the significance will truly capture enough attention that the people will decide it is time to change the system that allows the minority to essentially rule the day. That's not just the Senate Republicans, it was the Governor too, who was apparently out to prove a point. And he proved a point.

At one point, you can really see the emotion in his voice. Check out the video, it's worth a few minutes.

Brian Leubitz :: Steinberg: 2/3 Is the Cause of The Entire Problem
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Recall (0.00 / 0)
  Think about it.  IOU's (essentially 80 cents on the dollar) for everyone--prisons, cops, firefighters, local governments, etc (except education and bondholders).  These stakeholders will howl (unlike the poor, who are expected to die silently or move to another state and die there).  Anger at the man who made it all possible--Schwartz.  Replacement by a candidate who promises to sign the majority rule fee swap/oil/cigarette/millionaires tax.

The petitions are qualified.  Let the State Democratic establishment show some gumption for once.


and yet he hasn't moved on 2/3??? (0.00 / 0)
It was pathetic during his townhall when he talked about how 2/3 could only go to the ballot via signatures (duh) and maybe sometime  people would start collecting and it would be on the ballot in June or November. Yet not realizing the deadline has passed for June. Pretty clueless about the cause of the entire problem.

Too bad he won't demonstrate leadership on this as he has enough Cash on Hand to put majority vote on the ballot.  

Twitter: @BobBrigham


Recall and 2/3 (0.00 / 0)
How about both.  Realistically, the recall makes more political sense in that if qualified, it would constrain Arnie's actions during a campaign.

Arnie fancies himself to be a modern day Ronald Reagan, in reality he is turning himself into Jessie Ventura. Let's help him see the reality.


both (0.00 / 0)
  Of course we need both, but the recall is the only possible game-changer for the next few months.  Democrats start collecting signatures and Schwartz is told in no uncertain terms that if he doesn't agree to reasonable compromises then they will be turned in.  Then we will
have a Democrat--and the one who runs on "I'll sign the majority rule fee swap/tax on millionaires/oil/tobacco and keep our schools open" will win.  My guess is Schwartz won't like playing the part of the Fuhrer in his bunker and will cave--but if he doesn't, this solves the problem.  It's important to understand that the budget has been passed until June of 2010.

 Now if we can only get Chiang to direct payments to those areas with representatives who voted for the budget, and away from those who did not, then we would see very quick action by the Republicans.


[ Parent ]
Minor quibble (0.00 / 0)
Is it lawful to take a signature and then not duly submit it?  I highly suspect not.  They could, however, say "Unless you do "x" we'll keep collecting signatures until we have enough."

[ Parent ]
It's worth noting that 2/3 got us here (0.00 / 0)
It's not just now, when the stakes are high, that 2/3 hurts us. Indeed, it has been creating the problem for at least a decade, when Republicans insisted on lowering/rebating taxes when times were good, and in the medium years, when things were turning and they still insisted on avoiding the problem, still cutting taxes and then doing that ridiculous bond issue to clean up a bit of debt.

EVERY YEAR the 2/3 requirement has contributed to late budgets, and to pork produced by a handful of holdouts who cared more for what they could do for themselves than for what was best for the state as a whole.

Fry, don't be a hero! It's not covered by our health plan!


Good Point! (0.00 / 0)
And yet further evidence that the Republican Party are, in fact, a terrorist organization intent on destroying our entire society.

From their proposed, and actual, treatment of the poor and disabled to their own wives they are the party of..

Lies.

Brutatality.

And...

Not at all what Jesus had in mind when he created Christianity.

If Obama had any balls he's ex parte Merreyman and lock the whole vile gang of 'em up...

...and throw away the key.


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox