[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

CA-36: Harman Primary Gets Going

by: David Dayen

Sat May 09, 2009 at 10:58:56 AM PDT


So I'm quoted in this Politico article about potential primary challenges to Jane Harman.  I've said clearly that she'll either face a primary or drop out, and now multiple challengers, including 2006 opponent Marcy Winograd, have stepped up.  One thing that people don't totally remember about that 2006 challenge is that Marcy got in the race in February for a June primary.  She ended up raising and spending about $380,000, but she did not have time for a national fundraising base or a netroots strategy.  She basically just went ahead and ran, and she got 38% of the vote.  Starting the primary a year out this time will simply yield better results.

The other part, which Alex Eisenstadt acknowledges, is that Harman was a target long before the recent revelation of wiretapped conservations between her and suspected Israeli agents offering vague quid pro quo deals on getting some AIPAC members out of legal trouble.

It's true that Harman holds a firm grip on her comfortably Democratic district, having won 69 percent in the 2008 general election.

Still, her left flank remains exposed in large part because of her hawkish, pro-military reputation. After Sept. 11, 2001, Harman was an early advocate for the creation of a Department of Homeland Security, and she threw her support behind the American-led invasion of Iraq. She went so far as to criticize the FBI and the CIA for moving too slowly to respond to terrorist threats.

Those stances continue to rankle local progressives, and the recent controversy has only revived the frustrations that seemed to crest in 2006 with Winograd's challenge. Last week, Winograd organized a protest outside Harman's district headquarters, with activists calling on the California Democrat to resign. The environmental organization Greenpeace is coordinating a mailing in the district pressuring Harman, who has a seat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, on energy issues.

David Dayen, a California activist who writes for the liberal blog Calitics, said he expects progressive organizations to ramp up their efforts against Harman in the weeks ahead.

"I don't get the sense that in May, the year before this primary is happening, there is going to be a lot of clamoring over Harman, but I do think you're starting to see progressive groups get involved," said Dayen.

I reject the theory later in the piece that CA-36 is a moderate district.  The PVI is D+12, and the formerly conservative areas have moderated their views.  Torrance, the supposed "Orange County of LA County," just elected two Democrats to its City Council.  What's more, Harman votes substantially to the right of the district and has for years.

Winograd will be holding a campaign kickoff on Monday at the Venice Pier around 4:00pm, so she's obviously serious about making this run again.  And she'll be taking questions in a liveblog session at Firedoglake today at 11am.  John Amato of Crooks and Liars fame may also make a run at this seat.

...Transcript of the FDL session here.

David Dayen :: CA-36: Harman Primary Gets Going
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Too bad I missed the chat at FDL (0.00 / 0)
I even read FDL yesterday and didn't realize that she'd be there today.  I would have enjoyed participating. Oh well, I'll read the transcript.  Thanks for the update David

Need a contact # for a CA Legislator? Check here

Howie Klein's final comment today (0.00 / 0)
Looks like you will have at least one more chance to live-blog with Marcy at FireDogLake. David, any chance of doing that here at Calitics?

http://firedoglake.com/2009/05...

Marcy, thanks for spending the time with us- and thanks for the AWESOME answers to our questions. There should be a Marcy Winograd is every congressional district in America and then we'd have a real democracy. I'll be looking forward to having you back on as the campaign kicks into high gear and I'll be looking forward to your comments on all the issues before Congress between now and then. Have a great announcement ceremony on Monday!



I think that can be arranged (0.00 / 0)
Will bring it up with her at the kickoff on Monday.

[ Parent ]
Wish we had a challenger who lived in the district (0.00 / 0)
Winograd lives in Pacific Palisades. Nothing illegal about that at all, but it would be nice to have some challenging candidates who actually lived in the district. What about Ted Lieu or Janice Hahn? Any chance they'd primary Harman?

asdf (5.00 / 1)
a) it's perfectly legal as you note
b) she moved out of the Palisades and lives in the Marina so your claim is wrong
c) if Tom McClintock hasn't proved that voters don't give a damn about this, I don't know what would.  This is just the talking point of people who don't have another criticism.

Ted Lieu or Janice Hahn would certainly jump in the moment that Harman retires, and not a minute before.


[ Parent ]
The Harman Reality (0.00 / 0)
Elected to the seat in 1992 when Bill Clinton received just 41% of the vote against Bush & Perot, so caled progressives fail to acknowledge or accept the fact this seat would still be in the hands of the GOP if not for Jane Harman.

When Jane Harman challenged for the Democratic nomination for governor in 1998 she left the seat in the hands of Janice Hahn to hold.

She was easily defeated.

It was Jane Harman who defeated one-term Congressman Steve Kuykendall and has held the seat in 2002, 04, 06 and 08.

Harman has been a pragmatic and responsible Democrat her entire career. The former legislative director for US Senator John Tunney, Harman also served as chief counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

In 1996 she held off Republican Susan Brooks 52-44 and has made inrroads in this district like no other because of her pro-business and pro-growth agenda that embraces education, public safety and national security.

It was Harman in 92 who spent an incredible sum of $2.3 million to win the open seat from Joan Milke Flores and her voting record reflected the moderate views of the district.

Since 2003 liberals have hounded Harman despite her expertise in national security and defense issues for the ranting of Marcy Winograd, an ambitious liberal who would be a back bencher with all bark and no bite!

The White House in all liklihood will back Harman and deservedly so. This challenge backs any rationale other than the personal ambition of someone who wants to be in congress and can't wait any longer for Henry Waxman to retire.

Is Harman remembered for holding the seat in 1994 by just 812 votes? Does she get any credit for carrying the district with 52% of the vote in 96 when Clinton received just 47%?

Blind liberal ambition based on the illegal disclosure of tapes is the basis for this myopic challenge. Harman has helped Democrats all over the state and deserves so much more than this kind of attack from the left just determined to end her career no matter the consequences.


Have you ever heard of redistricting? (4.00 / 1)
I don't know what consequences you refer to from challenging her, but it certainly isn't having a Republican in this district.

Harman won close elections in the old 50-50% district in the 90's before it was redistricted into a super-safe Democratic district (PVI D+12)  All of those close elections you cite are totally irrelevant now.  

The choice isn't between Harman or a Republican; it's between Harman or a better Democrat.

Need a contact # for a CA Legislator? Check here


[ Parent ]
not the same district in 90s and zeroes (4.00 / 1)
right now, the 36th is 46% democrats, 28% republicans, 22% DTS. in 2008, obama won the district 64-34. in 2006, DiFi won it 63-31. in 2004, kerry won it 59-40, and boxer won it 62-33. the only republican who has come close to winning it was schwarzeneggar in 2006, 53-43.

the fact that the district used to have different lines well over a decade and a half ago is utterly irrelevant. harman doesn't hold the seat as a permanent fief, she represents it at the whim of the voters in that district.


[ Parent ]
I didn't know borderline treason was so responsible and pragmatic. (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Borderline treason? (0.00 / 0)
Is that a new crime concocted by liberals?

What exactly does that mean?

Treason?

Can you even define the word?

What's illegal is the leaking of partial tapes to make a political point in a case that has been dismissed by the courts.

I'm sure Marcy will be a vocal back bencher with no seniority and no expertise. She can run from cable show to cable show ranting with the likes of Waters and Sanchez while getting absolutley nothing accomplished because this is an exercise in soothing her massive ego.


[ Parent ]
Borderline treason is using your influence (0.00 / 0)
to attempt to free foreign spies in exchange for lobbying efforts on your behalf. Jesus, is this such a difficult concept for you to comprehend? How exactly is that kosher?  

[ Parent ]
Can you refer to "borderline" treason (0.00 / 0)
in the US Criminal Code?

I guess we'll have a borderline grand jury presentment and some borderline indictments, borderline trial and borderline conviction as well....


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox