[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Prop 1A needs to be defeated, and I'm going to help.

by: Brian Leubitz

Thu Apr 23, 2009 at 09:30:00 AM PDT


When the time came to make a decision on the propositions, it was with a heavy heart that I chose to oppose Prop 1A. I understand the difficult position that the legislators face. Republicans in the Legislature are amusing themselves with death-talk of the California state government.  It really is quite scary stuff. Yet despite the loaded gun pointing to our head, it is imperative that California has a government moving towards a more functioning structure, not in the other direction.

And that is the problem with Prop 1A. It moves us in the wrong direction. It moves us towards more hurdles, not less. Whether it is or isn't a spending cap (depending on who you talk to) isn't as important when it is considered in the context that this is one additional layer of dysfunction on top of an already dysfunctional system. During my appearance on KALW's Your Call Radio (podcast here), I had a chance to discuss the problems with Prop 1A, and truly this is the one that would really leave a welt on our governance going forward.

It is because of this dysfunction that I will be working with the No on Prop 1A campaign for the next month leading up to the election trying to get the message out about why this proposition is wrong for California. This is a progressive campaign, funded and led by progressive organizations like the SEIU state council, the California Federation of Teachers, and the California Faculty Association.  It is imperative that there be a progressive voice explaining why Prop 1A is wrong for California rather than just leaving the opposition to be defined by the ravings of the Howard Jarvis Tax Association and their fellow anti-government winger friends. And that is all the more important with the polling now showing disastrous numbers for Prop 1A. In a CBS 5/SurveyUSA poll 42% of voters said they certain to vote 'No', while 29% were certain to vote 'Yes.' All of the demos for this are horrible, with none exceeding 36% support.  There are a lot of reasons for that, but it is critical that California's leaders understand that HJTA doesn't speak for us, but that Californians really want a well-functioning government for the long-term.

As always, I'll disclose my affiliation when discussing Prop 1A. However, as a point of transparency, I was neither a part of the campaign nor in discussions with the campaign before we released the Calitics Ed Board endorsements on the special election.

Now that that is out of the way, I look forward to working to defeat this measure. If you have any questions for the campaign, please email me. I'll do my best to answer them or direct you to somebody who can.  If you'd like more information about Prop 1A, you can check out our *brand spanking new website,  follow us on Twitter and join our group on Facebook.

Brian Leubitz :: Prop 1A needs to be defeated, and I'm going to help.
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

This sky is falling talk is quite funny... (0.00 / 0)
But here's a prediction so i can be held to it.

- All props fail
- Dems try and pass a "fee" based TAX solution
- Arnold either Vetoes again or the Supreme Court shoots it down (rightfully so)
- With state on the verge of recievership Marijuana is legalized and taxed
- Our budget issues stableized (for the moment) Democratic self important twit Newsom/Villaragosa loses election to Republican self important twit Whitman/Poizner

I could be wrong but life will go on either way.

Hi. I'm Charles.  I worked my way from homelessness to a business owner.  Be what you have it in you to be!


"Heavy Heart" Express my feelings as well (0.00 / 0)
But we are now in a time of great danger and great opportunity.

I'm really worried about screwing the education system short term (I have one in high school and one in State College). But I won't stand for blackmail by the anti-tax pitbulls or the corporate interests holding their leash.

The time is ripe. I think we can sell voters on the idea that politicians who promise LESS government have only delivered BAD government.


Now perhaps ... (0.00 / 0)
While I respect your decision, you should also outline YOUR May 20th plan in advance with realistic solutions that will pass the legislature and be signed into law by the Governor.

Just saying no is easy. Providing a solution that will pass muster within the structure we're dealing with is an entirely different ball game.

I look forward to your posts and tweets that provide an alternative to what our Democratic leaders have put on the ballot.

P.S. -- It was great being on radio with you the other day. Let's do it again!


Use the solutions to change the structure (8.00 / 2)
If you are pushing, for example, wealth taxes, and there's a robust and strong campaign for this in late May and June, then you back Republicans up against a wall, make them vote against the kind of wealth taxes Obama proposes, and show people the reasons for undermining the 2/3rds rule.

The crisis we face is severe, and it must change the structure.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
Been There, Done That (0.00 / 0)
There have repeated attempts to push for the re-establishment of Gov. Wilson's added taxes on the upper-income bracket. Those failed. So did the messaging.

Which brings us back to square one.

I'm still waiting for an articulate and responsible path out of this that will be approved by the Legislature by a 2/3 majority, get signed by the Governor and get voter approval.


[ Parent ]
Or, another question (0.00 / 0)
Why wasn't there any effort to go directly to the ballot, bypassing the legislature, earlier. I suppose this isn't the question for somebody with a legislative background so much as for progressive interest groups.

If we were going to be fighting election fights, we might as well be fighting fights with an upside.  Here we are fighting a fight for survival with no possible GOOD outcome.  There is just bad and badder.

We can pass wealth taxes. Prop 63 really wasn't so long ago. We can reform our budget system, but it just might be that the Legislature is the wrong legislative system to do it in.

Look, Prop 13 broke California via the ballot box, perhaps it's time to go on the offensive back where it all began.

I think?


[ Parent ]
Snore (8.00 / 1)
Your demand for a plan is the same tired rhetoric the Democrats in the legislature have fallen back on every time the GOP out-maneuvers them over the past ten years.

It's your equivalent of "when did you stop beating your wife?"

The responsibility of coming up with a plan AND getting our support (less you power barons forget, you need us serfs to approve many of your schemes) falls to the elected officials whose salaries we pay.

Join me if you will, for a brief interlude at a fine dining establishment.

Patron: My pasta fra diavolo is too salty and piping cold!

Chef:  Wanker!  If you think you can do it better, get in the kitchen.  And never question or criticize me! Oh, and I expect great reviews from you.  Otherwise you're just another trailer park moron, who should be eating at McDonalds.

Patron: But, I'm paying you for your services and they suck.

Chef:  Why don't you do this, come up with your own recipes, buy the food and cook it, but continue to pay me and keep me in business?  After all, I'm the expert.

End scene.

That's what the Democratic Leadership, wants us to do.  No thanks.

BTW, if the reviews on their meal from Survey USA are any indication, the Dem Leadership needs to go back to culinary school.      


[ Parent ]
Proposition 1A has NO EFFECT on the current deficit (0.00 / 0)
The $16 billion (and shrinking) it would contribute to the General Fund for up to two years wouldn't start until FY 2012.  That's mere drops in the bucket compared to the tens of billions in draconian cuts that Proposition 1A writes into our Constitution.  Still, there's plenty of time between May 20 and FY 2012 to try to repeal the repressive 2/3 requirement.  Even if we aren't able to do that, the status quo is better than Proposition 1A.

[ Parent ]
Another plan (0.00 / 0)
I am new to Calitics.  My instinct is also to vote no on these propositions.  I hate that I will vote with the Howard Jarvis movement in the next election. I want the state legislature to be able to deal with our problems.  The propositions are easily bought by big money.  I will be watching for reporting on a legislative proposal to our budget.  Is California the canary for the US in terms of the Grover Norquist plan?

You're not voting with the Jarvis folks (0.00 / 0)
We shouldn't frame it that way. They're doing their own wacko thing for their own wacko reasons. We're doing our progressive thing for our own progressive reasons.

Someone in the Legislature used the Jarvis opposition to the props to say that we'd be "strange bedfellows" for voting as they did. Instead I thought of it like the time I was at Scout camp when I was 12. I was assigned to share a tent with one of the most obnoxious kids in the troop - loud, snores, etc. But if that was the price of a week on Catalina, I was willing to pay it.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
Exactly (0.00 / 0)
This isn't about anything the rightwing is saying, and that's one of the reasons that this campaign is so important.  We need to win, yes, but we need to win on progressive messaging.

The fact is that this is a bad measure for the future of California governance. It sets limits and restrictions that we never should be facing, and places us in real danger of squandering California's immense advantages.

I think?


[ Parent ]
Sadly (0.00 / 0)
You are not only voting with the Howard Jarvis folks, but also with the extremists at the California Republican Party and the loudmouths at the "John and Ken Show."

Whether it's on the far right or far left, voting no without a responsible alternative THAT WILL PASS THE LEGISLATIVE AND GET THE GOVERNORS SIGNATURE is irresponsible.

Sure, we can hope for a change in the 2/3 and sweeping Democratic victories to get us there, but the reality part of the equation is that there will be massive and deep cuts if the initiative don't pass. That's exactly what the Republicans and Howard Jarvis want.


[ Parent ]
er (0.00 / 0)
There will be massive cuts if 1A does pass.

Massive cuts that will never be restored.

Bigger than the down-the-road tax increases.  Much, much bigger.


[ Parent ]
It's always the same... (0.00 / 0)
Criticizing the Democratic leadership is supporting the Republicans.  You're objectively pro-Jarvis, you far-lefties*.  

Shut up, sit down, open your wallet, push the official party line and do what you're told.  

-----

*Where "far left" apparently means some combination of:

(a) "Wants the sort of government structure that actually exists in the vast majority of the United States."

(b) "Thinks that the sort of public services that have been proven to actually work in the majority of industrialized countries might also work here if the politicians weren't so thoroughly compromised by the need to constantly grovel for cash from the very interests who oppose the concept of public services."  


[ Parent ]
Is that why Howard Jarvis and the GOP agree with you instead of supporting 1A? (0.00 / 0)
1A allows growth in government spending.

And your proposal?

Oh that's right. You don't have one.  


[ Parent ]
Here's the plan: eliminate the 2/3 rules (4.00 / 1)
You can keep repeating that there is no plan, but that doesn't make it so.  The plan is to eliminate the 2/3 rules and enable the legislature to adopt a realistic budget and tax plan that really meets the needs of the people.  We will never eliminate the 2/3 rules if we keep agreeing to horrible deals like 1A, simply on the grounds that it is the best we can do.  The system is broken and must change.  Now, you can say that is an impossible dream.  I don't think so.

I am tired of voting for bad deals because there is "no alternative."  I am going to vote to put the legislature in the position of absolutely having to eliminate the 2/3 rules.  For a change, it will be them, not us, for whom there is no alternative.  And the Democrats elected as progressives, who have facilitated these bad deals instead of fighting for the critical systemic change we need, will have to either live up to the reasons we elected them, or make room for others who will.



[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox