[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Another Poll Shows Trouble In Special Land

by: Brian Leubitz

Fri Apr 10, 2009 at 14:12:14 PM PDT


The No on 1D/E Campaign, which recently merged, have released an internal poll (PDF) from Tulchin Research.  The data is consistent with a previous PPIC poll. Prop 1D (First 5) is slightly ahead 48-42, and Prop 1E (Mental health) is down 44-46. More spin details from the No campaign:

   *  A solid majority of voters describe the measures as "deceptive" (56%).
   * Nearly half of the voters are concerned they will "cut funding for children and the mentally ill" (45%).
   * There are nearly twice as many voters who strongly oppose Props 1D & 1E.
   * The voters most likely to cast a ballot are more likely to vote NO than less likely voters.
   * "Definite" voters reject Proposition 1E (42% Yes - 48% NO).
   * "Definite" voters split their opinion on Proposition 1D (46% Yes - 45% NO).
   * Nearly 1 in 5 voters (18%) believe that Props 1D & 1E hurt programs and services, particularly for children and the mentally ill.
   * 16% of voters describe the initiatives as "deceptive" or "dishonest."

Either way, being below 50% at this point is just a really bad position. It is possible to make up some grouund with a ton of money, but the yes campaign will be swimming upstream from the general drift towards no.  In a low-turnout special election, that drift is likely to be more visible.

All I'm saying is that if I were on the "Budget Reform Now" campaign, I'd be getting pretty nervous right now.

Brian Leubitz :: Another Poll Shows Trouble In Special Land
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

And if I were a CTA member, (0.00 / 0)
I'd be wondering why we are spending $5 million to try to levitate these clumsy propositions, when we would be better off to spend that money next year on a drive to eliminate the 2/3 rules.

I feel bad for them (0.00 / 0)
I participated in a debate on the props against a CTA member and local school board official in Torrance, and I had to feel for her position.  She had no real argument, just that failure would be worse, and she seemed to think that CTA would move to fix the mess they created later if everything passed.  It's an impossible position for them to be in, and in some ways I'm sympathetic.

But that's with the rank-and-file.  Not the leadership.  


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox