[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

CDP going back to the future?

by: cfinnie

Mon Apr 06, 2009 at 21:54:59 PM PDT


In Sunday's San Francisco Chronicle, Sr. Political Reporter Carla Marinucci writes about the race for chair of the California Democratic Party:

"Even as the Democratic Party rides an Obama-fueled wave of youth, enthusiasm and "change," the Democrats of California look to be bucking the trend: They're preparing to elect former state Senate President Pro Tem John Burton, 77, the iconic, battle-scarred veteran of state politics, as their party leader.

It's a move not without controversy: The powerful former legislator, who first held the job of party chairman 36 years ago, is to his fans a colorful idol of progressive politics and to his critics the very symbol of old school, insider machine politics."

The article goes on to paint Senator Burton's election as nearly inevitable. But the comments are fascinating. In 6 pages of comments I read this morning, two supported Senator Burton. The rest were pretty consistent--the CDP needs to stop recycling retired politicians to lead the party. One poster wanted to know if this meant disco was coming back too. As hilarious as they were, they pointed to a pretty disturbing perception among California voters--that the CDP is resistant to, and even actively hostile to change.

cfinnie :: CDP going back to the future?
Marinucci also points to a possibility that others have noted, saying "Republicans watching the show say Burton's election would provide them with plenty of material for attack.

"It's the party of clogged arteries," says GOP consultant Kevin Spillane, who advises GOP gubernatorial candidate Steve Poizner. "They're going to be led by survivors of the 1960s and 1970s, when people are looking for 21st century solutions."

But Barbara O'Connor, professor of political communication at Cal State Sacramento, says "I think it is an homage to long years of public service and friendship. Many people owe him their careers, their electability ... and it's payback time," she said.

While "his demographics are not similar to Obama's," he has a constituency that is key, she said: "He brings labor solidly behind him - and the old party guard.'"

And she is exactly right. That's who will be in charge of the CDP--labor and the old party guard. As Marinucci points out, that's an unusual choice when the desire for change was obviously so high. In a year when Barack Obama won California by 24%. When the grassroots activists we depend on all over the state to do the Party's business all year--between elections and during them--are clamoring for more accountability, transparency, and control.

Is that what California Democrats want? Homage? Or do we want a Party that can be effective? That can support the issues and candidates that matter to us? And a chair that can actually lead our party into this century and the next.

Before I heard about the column, I sent out a second email to CDP delegates about my campaign last night. I've been fairly stunned at the response. At the number of people who have taken the trouble to email back to say they've heard of me, or heard me, and are going to vote for me.

Like many others, Marinucci doesn't give my campaign much of a chance. But most people didn't think Americans were ready to elect a black man as president. Few people believed Jerry McNerney could win a seat in Congress. But I worked in Jerry's campaign, and he never doubted it.

One lady today asked me if I would appoint her to the state standing committee she currently serves on after I was elected chair. Maybe she's just being nice. But maybe in an era where a wind engineer can go to Congress and a black man to the White House, the CDP can stop electing members of the old guard as chair.

One commenter to Marinucci's story said he nearly snorted his corn flakes when the story painted me as the defender of California's youth. At 59 myself, I am a pretty unlikely champion for the future. But my vision for the CDP is vastly different than John Burton's. My dedication to change is what has kept me going through a physically and financially taxing campaign. And my commitment to the California Democrats who answer my emails and come up to talk to me after central committee meetings is what keeps me going.

Change is possible. If only enough state central committee members believe in and vote for it on April 25.  

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Chris Finnie: (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for running.  

Need a contact # for a CA Legislator? Check here

You're not gonna win (0.00 / 0)
How important is CDP chair, really?

##########################

The Mad Professah Lectures
http://www.madprofessah.com


Take a look at (8.00 / 1)
California's epic electoral failure, relative to the rest of the nation, in 2006 and 2008, and then ask yourself what makes California so different, and I think you'll find the answer.

[ Parent ]
I don't accept your assumptions..... (0.00 / 0)
but if I did than any electoral triumphs of the past, relative to the rest of the nation, must be because of the CDP chairs---old guard all.

Even so, it's an important position. You've raised some good points elsewhere about ensuring changes in the operational structure(fund raising, electoral targeting,internet utilization, etc) that I'm hoping Burton reads and heeds. But the Chron article was weaker than the opposition to Burton. I doubt 10% of the Democratic rank and file could self-identify any of the past CDP chairs. You may make an effectiveness argument out of that but most rank and file Dems don't read this blog, don't go to Central Committee meetings and frankly don't care to know who their local A.D. reps are to the State Convention or who the State Chair is. There is no groundswell of outrage that the Liberal Lion is going to be the next CDP Chair. And frankly, if there was sufficient outrage amongst the activist Democrats who do go to meetings, raise $, register voters, pass resolutions, work for candidates, etc, than there would be significant opposition to Burton. There isn't. Most elements of the Party believe he will do as good of job at Chair as he has wrapping up the Chairmanship.

You may consider me part of the old guard but hell, I'm concerned about Burton too. I fear he may chart the CDP on an ideological course that may make those huddled masses in the Sacramento Convention Center later this month feel warm and fuzzy but could drive away countless Californian's who have come to accept Democrats as the most qualified and non-dogmatic candidates for public office. Do I think he will actually do that? No, but it is possible. But I have to weigh that fear with the confidence that I think he will raise the necessary money and unite the Party. And as for his demeanor, I think we've learned that we need someone who can use a little salty language and say no when a Don Perata comes and wants some cash for his keep out of jail fund.


[ Parent ]
I'm confused (0.00 / 0)
If I thought Senator Burton would confine his salty language to Senator Perata, I wouldn't worry about it a bit. The fact that he employed it on an activist volunteer he'd met in the hall for all of 60 seconds worries me more. Unlike you, I am afraid he will drive away countless Californians--not just voters, but volunteers. I think it is quite possible. Not because he swears. But because he treats people with contempt and arrogance. Even his supporters admit it. I think his attitude will offend volunteers. And would be quite unfortunate.

Since he has already stacked the AD elections with labor delegates, we have already lost the true party activists who might have won those seats otherwise. I doubt the labor delegates will have anything further to do with the party after they've cast the votes they promised their unions for Burton. Which brings up the question of what the unions will expect in return. I have no clue. But I also have no doubt there will be something.

You also haven't talked to the people I have. All over the state, people who support him say they're glad I'm bringing up the issues I am. And plenty who don't say they weren't going to vote for chair until they knew somebody else was running. I didn't expect there would be a lot. I've been surprised. A lot of people knew far more about him than I did. To be honest, I'd never heard of the man before the executive board meeting last November. But people all over the state have told me stories. Fortunately, most of them are also supportive of my campaign message, even if they don't know me at all.

What confuses me is, if you're concerned about Burton too, why are you defending him?


[ Parent ]
Confused? (4.00 / 1)
Hmmm....labor delegates are not "true party activists", you never heard of John Burton before last November...yikes

[ Parent ]
Your comments about labor delegates and their unions (0.00 / 0)
speak volumes about you. I don't need to hear or read any more thank you.

As for fears, I have fears or concerns with many candidates I end up voting for and defending. But whatever fears I have about JB just got put into perspective by your anti-union salvo.  


[ Parent ]
Sorry, (0.00 / 0)
thats me, John Hanna.

[ Parent ]
Chris, I have a few questions, if you don't mind. (0.00 / 0)
As disclosure, I do support John Burton for chair.  Senator Burton has a long history here in SF as a progressive who is willing to fight for causes he believes in.  That being said, I do have a few questions for you.  

What specifically would you change? Are there any programs that you would add that Senator Burton has said he opposes?

I've heard you support the addition of a number of offices, including Fresno and a few others. I'm extremely enthusiastic about growing the party in so-called "red areas", how does the addition of a physical presence further that?  

And last, but certainly not least, how would you raise the money to provide the services the CDP currently provides and those you would add?

I think?


I'm not drinking the Kool-aid (0.00 / 0)
So he's a progressive on policy.  Big deal.  It's not like the CDP is going to elect Evan Bayh as party chair.  In large part, the state party chair has little to do with policy, and everything to do with organization and process.  Will the party be organized to fight every election in every district, and pay attention to the grassroots, or will it be a stand-pat organization content to remain confined to the coast districts and catering to the Capitol Mall crowd?  Art Torres was very much the latter; you can think of him as the state version of Terry McAuliffe.  

I'm looking for our own Howard Dean.  I recall Burton's tenure as President pro tem, and I have listened to his campaign spiel this time around.  Nothing in his past or his present convinces me that he will be California's Howard.  Sorry, but I see nothing more than business as usual happening the next four years.  


[ Parent ]
Exactly! (0.00 / 0)
I too have listened to Senator Burton's speeches and read the questionnaires he filled out. It is clear that he is very interested in getting involved in the issues. That's really all he talks about.

I, on the other hand, don't think it would be my place as chair to determine the priorities of the party. Much more in the style of Howard Dean at the DNC, it would be my job to build the CDP into an organization supporting the priorities of its members.


[ Parent ]
I don't mind at all (0.00 / 0)
I do know you support John Burton. You posted that earlier. And I'm well aware of his excellent voting record. Marinucci quoted me as saying that in the article.

To answer your questions, Senator Burton has not addressed any of my suggested programs that I'm aware of. He did tell me some things during a phone conversation before I decided to run that would tend to indicate he has a different approach than I do. That said, one of his answers on the Rural Caucus questionnaire is a direct contradiction to something he told me. So I'm not really sure where he stands on it. The issue in question was the role of the CDP in recruiting candidate to run in all elections all over the state.

I have a written plan posted on my campaign website at www.chrisfinnie4cdp.com that lays out the changes I propose in more detail. But, in general terms, what I'm trying to accomplish is to broaden the decision making, increase the power of local party organizations and the grassroots, improve communications, use resources in response to communications from and priorities of members, and better use what I call the human resources of the state party.

I have not actually committed to more offices. But I said in Fresno that I have proposed that the CDP staff spend more time in the field, and that I would look at the budget to determine whether the CDP could fund, or help fund, field offices regionally. The purpose again, would be to enhance two-way communications with local party organizations and supporters, and to support red-to-blue efforts most effectively. I would want to evaluate whether offices were the best investment to achieve those goals, and whether there would be local support available. For example, I would want to develop a plan with the local or regional party that would define how they would use the office to build Democratic outreach and registration, to support candidates and issues, what staffing they could provide, and other issues like that--before I would be willing to commit any CDP money to it. If the commitment is there on their part, and the office would further their plans, then it might be a good investment.

As to fundraising, I have a couple of plans. One is to increase the small donor base through events, online outreach, and other strategies. Another is to give potential donors more information about CDP plans. If they are excited about programs we plan to fund, I believe people will be more willing to give. The third is to involve some people who have more experience at this than I do. Eric Bauman has a record of fundraising success in L.A. Shawn Bagley and Vinz Koller have done a terrific job in Monterey. The chair in Ventura told me Jess Durfee has had some very successful programs in San Diego. There are probably others I haven't heard about. But this is what I mean about human resources. These people know how to do this. And I plan to ask for their help and involvement.

I hope that answers your questions. If not, feel free to ask any more you have.  Thanks, Chris


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox