[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Bill Bagley on Bipartisanship

by: Brian Leubitz

Wed Jan 07, 2009 at 08:07:22 AM PST


Today in the Capitol Morning Report, a subscription only fact-filled tip sheet, former Assembly Member Bill Bagley takes a go at the gridlock in Sacramento.  You might remember Bagley's name, as he is a long-time Republican Assemblyman who endorsed Barack Obama for the Presidency. He had a record of being a real moderate, but it was easier to be a moderate in the 1960s when he spent most of his time in the Legislature.

He goes through a whole litany of reasons why the Legislature is not a very bipartisan place from his day to the current antipathy.  Bagley begins with the ending of cross-filing, which brought a bunch of moderate Republicans, in 1959.  He then notes that the reform (Prop 9, 1974) that ended lobbyist lunches alienated the members from each other. They no longer dined and "hung out" with each other, and had the opportunity to like each other as human beings.

All of that is interesting background, but the real problem comes from the two more recent developments: Prop 13 and term limits.  Prop 13 brought a bunch of conservative radicals who not only voted in a bloc, but wouldn't even sit next to Democrats.  

But the death knell to bipartisanship was really term limits.  The term limits blocked any hope of legislators developing a trust between members. There can be no long-term relationships of trust, because there are no relationships at all. Members have an eye on the next office, and the primary for that office.

Bagley's solution is the Open Primary and optimism for the meaningless Proposition 11 redistricting reforms. As we've said here many, many times, Prop 11 isn't a real solution. You can't redistrict "moderate" districts into LA or SF, or even some Republican areas. Perhaps the open primary would bring a few less partisan voters into the voting booth, but it's certainly no lock that will actually happen.

What amazes me is how quickly Bagley just drifts over the more obvious solution: repeal term limits.  Term limits create a constant merry go round where legislators are always looking towards the next office, ignoring their current surroundings.  Allow them to get used to the place, and to their fellow legislators. Unfortunately, as we discovered with Prop 93 last year, there is still quite a bit of opposition to that particular reform.

A final point should be made.  One party has been willing to compromise, has made cuts to some of its core constituencies, has been willing to adjust to reflect the reality of our time. Unfortunately, you can't compromise with somebody who refuses to budge.  You have to give a little to get a little, and Bagley's Republican heirs refuse to do so.  

Brian Leubitz :: Bill Bagley on Bipartisanship
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
bipartisanship (0.00 / 0)
  It's the 2/3rd's vote--instead of aiming for a majority the Reps aim for a minority.  You're seeing the same phenomemon in the Senate--McConnell thinks that because there are "only" 59 Dems he can destroy the stimulus package.

 The state is headed to bankruptcy.  Dems should be preparing ballot measures now (tax increases on the top 1%, simple majority for a budget, 55% for tax increases).  Once the state hits bankruptcy then a recall of Schwartz is almost a certainty--at that point, a strong Democrat (probabl Brown) could run on the basis of implementing the above-mentioned initaitives.  But we need to start now.


This nonsense is all about... (0.00 / 0)
...letting Republicans off the hook.

Democrats have repeatedly compromised on the budget. They are not ideologues on this. Only the Republicans are. Yet nobody is willing to come out and acknowledge that - instead there is a persistent desire to use the crisis to attack the Legislature as a whole and push through reforms designed to weaken Democrats.

Post-partisanship always seems to mean "everyone agrees to a Republican agenda".

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


Well, you could redistrict moderate districts "into" LA (0.00 / 0)
say, but you'd have to have incredibly bizarre-looking districts that fanned out into places like the San Gabriel Valley.

I strongly suspect that won't be done under Prop 11.

Of course, the idea that we need these districts in the first place is more distorted Broderesque/Gergenesque thinking.


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox