[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Redistricting and Term Limit Reform

by: Brian Leubitz

Fri Jul 14, 2006 at 09:30:00 AM PDT


Schwarzenegger has waded into the fray on Sen. Alan Lowenthal's redistricting bill.

Hoping to resurrect an idea voters rejected in last year's special election, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger plans to offer lawmakers a deal: He'll support an easing of term limits if they'll agree to change the way California draws voting districts.

Schwarzenegger said in an interview Thursday he does not believe term limits have improved Sacramento's political culture. Allowing legislators to stay in office longer would be worthwhile, he said, if it induced them to put a proposal on the ballot that would strip them of the power to carve political boundaries.

  The governor reasons that lawmakers may not want to change voting districts, most of which favor incumbents, but they dislike term limits even more. One idea already under consideration in the Legislature would double the number of years members could serve in the Assembly — to 12 from six — provided they not run for the Senate when their term is up. Senators' maximum service could be extended to 12 years from eight.

Schwarzenegger says that he wants to make California elections more competitive, and that a new method of redistricting would help. He is backing a measure by Sen. Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach) that would transfer political map-making powers to a panel of 11 citizens, chosen by a bipartisan group of lawmakers and judges, and take effect after the 2010 census. [(LA Times
7/14/06) http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-arnold14jul14,1,4608230.story?coll=la-headlines-california]

The law will have to be passed in two separate initiatives to pass constitutional muster, but I think both are good ideas.  The hopping back and forth of Senators and Assemblymen doesn't allow them to fully learn the pace of each body.  And redistricting done right could be a good thing for both the Democrats and the State.

Getting people to vote to extend term limits might not be such an easy task though. A redistricting initiative without all the baggage of a mid-decade redraw and Tom Delay will do far better than last year's ill-fated Prop 77.

Brian Leubitz :: Redistricting and Term Limit Reform
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Term limits need to go (0.00 / 0)
Learning the process of legislating, creating the coalitions to pass your bills and simply learning some of the arcane rules of each chamber can take years.

Now we have essential amateurs, with minimal experience, in charge of the 5th largest economy in the world.

Term limits have proven to be the worst mistake in many years. The sooner they are gone, completely, the better.

Political Dogfight


It looks like SCA 3 is in trouble (0.00 / 0)
From what I understand, it's on life support at best.  Nunez apparently considered it, but that's not how it went down. Check out Tony Quinn's article in today's morning report:

http://rtumble.com/pdf/Quniin_MR_%20060717.pdf

I think?


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox