[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

California Race Chart (Part 1 of 3: Statewide Races)

by: cali_girl_in_texas

Wed Sep 17, 2008 at 17:55:59 PM PDT


As always, good stuff Here is my analysis of this fall's elections in California, broken up into 3 parts. Part 1 will cover the presidential race and the ballot measures, and the other two will be on the Congressional and State Legislature races; Part 2 Northern/Central California and Part 3 Southern California.

Cross-posted at Swing State Project: http://www.swingstateproject.c...

cali_girl_in_texas :: California Race Chart (Part 1 of 3: Statewide Races)
Here is the most recent registration data: http://sos.ca.gov/elections/ro...
Here is the list of candidates that will appear on the ballot: http://sos.ca.gov/elections/el...


Statewide Layout
Democrats: 7,053,860 (43.75%)
Republicans: 5,244,394 (32.53%)
Decline to State: 3,128,684 (19.40%)
Others: 696,849 (4.32%)


Key: I will list the incumbent first, in boldface (in open seats, the incumbent party first without boldface), and all minor parties after the two major parties.

D: Democratic
R: Republican
L: Libertarian
G: Green
AI: American Independent
PF: Peace and Freedom
I: Independent


Race Ratings
Toss-up: Margin by less than 5%
Lean: Margin by 5-10%
Likely: Margin by 10-15%
Strong: Margin by 15-20%
Solid: Margin by more than 20%


U.S. President: Sen. John McCain (R) vs. Sen. Barack Obama (D), Bob Barr (L), Alan Keyes (AI), Cynthia McKinney (G), and Ralph Nader (PF)

Profile: Obama's win of our whopping 55 electoral votes is a foregone conclusion; no matter how many times McSame says he can compete here.

Outlook: Likely to Strong Obama


Ballot Measures: A whopping 12 measures will be on the California ballot this fall. Information can be found here: http://www.smartvoter.org/2008... Field has released polls on 1A, 2, 4, 7, and 11. http://www.field.com/fieldpoll...

Prop. 1A (High-Speed Rail): This measure would issue $9.95 billion of general obligation bonds for a $40 billion high speed train, connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles, under supervision of the California High-Speed Rail Authority. The train would run from San Francisco to Los Angeles. So far, this measure is passing 56-30, and I strongly urge my fellow Californians to vote for this measure!

9/17/2008 Outlook: Likely Pass


Prop. 2 (Regulations on Animal Confinement): This measure would prohibit the confinement of farm animals that basically does not allow them to be comfortable, imposing a misdemeanor penalty and fine or imprisonment for violators, and bans cages for egg-laying poultry, gestation crates for sows and veal crates for veal calves. This measure is also passing by an overwhelming margin.

9/17/2008 Outlook: Strong Pass


Prop. 3 (Children's Hospital Bond): This bond issue would authorize $980 million for improvements on children's hospitals. A similar measure, Prop 61, passed 58-42 in 2004, so for now I can say that 3 will pass also.

9/17/2008 Outlook: Strong Pass


Prop. 4 (Waiting Period and Parental Notification): Those anti-choice folks just never give up, and are hoping that the third time will be a charm. Like its predecessors 73 and 85, this one would prohibit abortion for minors until 48 hours after physician notification, only this one mentions an alternative adult family member in the case of reported parental abuse. Still, the addition of that change does not change my staunch opposition to this at all. Right now, though, this measure is passing 48-39%. I can only hope those affirmative numbers go down.

9/17/2008 Outlook: Toss-Up/Lean Fail


Prop. 5 (Nonviolent Drug Offenses): This measure would allocate $460 million annually for expansion and improvement of treatment programs for nonviolent drug offenders, limiting court authority to incarcerate offenders who commit certain drug crimes or break treatment rules or parole. So far no polls have been released, so I can't make an accurate prediction as to how this measure will fare.

9/17/2008 Outlook: Not Yet Rated


Prop. 6 (Law Enforcement Funding and Criminal Law Revisions): This measure requires about $700 million of funding for police and local law enforcement, and makes 30 revisions to California criminal law. The funding would come from education, health care, and the environment, just to name a few. The last thing we need is money being diverted from services that keep people out of becoming criminals, so I am saying no to this measure. No polls on this have been released yet, though I hope concerns over the budget will send this to the ballot measure graveyard.

9/17/2008 Outlook: Not Yet Rated


Prop. 7 (Renewable Energy Generation): This measure would require government-owned utilities to generate 20% of their electricity from renewable energy sources by 2010, upping that requirement for all utilities to 40% by 2020 and 50% by 2025. However, from an L.A. Times editorial ( http://www.latimes.com/news/op... ) this bill has many drawbacks, including new regulatory powers which could lead to confusion, requiring a 2/3 vote of the legislature to remove, and the excluding of small renewable power-producing plants, which are actually leading the way in our transition to solar power. So I hope the affirmative numbers there go down fast and hard.

9/17/2008 Outlook: Toss-up/Lean Pass


Prop. 8 (Elimination of Same-Sex Marriage Rights): Basically, this measure is what it says; it eliminates the right of same-sex couples to marry. Marriages between same-sex couples would be neither valid nor recognized by the state. After our hard-fought victory in the Supreme Court, we want to make sure that same-sex couples have the same legal rights as everyone else. So far, it looks like that they will still be able to have their marriage rights, though the margins are too close for comfort. We still have to fight to protect them. So vote NO ON 8!

9/17/2008 Outlook: Toss-Up


Prop. 9 (Victims' Rights and Protection): This would amend the California Constitution to guarantee notification for crime victims, allowing victims' input in the criminal justice process, including bail, pleas, sentencing, and parole; taking victim safety into consideration for bail or parole which, except for guaranteed notification, is already in place. In addition, judges and the state lawmakers would have less power in awarding restitution, releasing inmates early, and granting inmates the ability to earn parole. No polls have been released on this yet, though I hope it goes down also!

9/17/2008 Outlook: Not Yet Rated


Prop. 10 (Renewable Energy): This measure would authorize $5 billion in bonds to assist in buying fuel efficient/alternative fuel vehicles (though only the natural gas-fueled Honda Civic qualifies) and for research in renewable energy and alternative fuel vehicles. I am for alternative energy, but not to give more money to the biggest donor to the Swift Boat Liars, T. Boone Pickens. Basically, this is his plan to control a nationwide natural gas monopoly, giving bigger tax incentives to people that purchase natural gas vehicles (though there is already a federal subsidy for them), than people that purchase hybrid vehicles, though the latter is more efficient. So I hope this proposition goes down also.

9/17/2008 Outlook: Not Yet Rated


Prop. 11 (Redistricting): This would amend the constitution to shift authority of shaping district borders from the state legislature to a commission made of 5 Democrats, 5 Republicans, and 4 others, which is out of balance with the registration numbers, as you can see above. California voters have a history of rejecting redistricting ballot measures, and I do think this one will also, though by a small margin. So far, this measure is passing, though by just a plurality. Ballot measures' affirmative numbers tend to go down over time, and California voters have a long history of rejecting redistricting measures, having rejected 9 so far including Prop 77 in 2005, which went down in a nearly 60-40 landslide.

9/17/2008 Outlook: Toss-Up/Lean Fail


Prop. 12 (Veterans' Bond): This would authorize $900 million in bonds for veterans' assistance in purchasing farms and homes. No polls on this measure have been released yet.

9/17/2008 Outlook: Not Yet Rated

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Comments welcome (0.00 / 0)
As always, your input is appreciated here.

My blog


Twitter


Mostly agree (8.00 / 1)
Although I think Prop 7 is Toss-Up/Lean Pass, pending polls. There is going to be an avalanche of ads from the No side, and that No side includes most of the state's environmental movement.

God I hope Prop 1A is a likely pass. Wish it were more certain, but it's going to be close.

As is Prop 8. I'd put that in the toss up category, really. The polls suggest an electorate closely divided on the matter. It shouldn't be close at all...but it will be.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


No on 10! (8.00 / 1)
I agree with most of what you've got here, but Prop 10 is a real stinker. Hopefully it will go down in flames.

Basically, it's part of T. Boone Pickens' plan to conquer America with his natural gas monopoly.  The trucks that most of the money goes to pay for don't even have to stay in the state. And the old dirty trucks aren't crushed, but can be put back into service. Hybrids are somehow considered less clean than natural gas vehicles, and are thus eligible for much smaller credits. Natural gas vehicles can get $10K/per vehicle. Currently there's only one consumer vehicle on the road that qualifies, the natural gas Honda Civic.

And oh yeah, T. Boone Pickens, the largest donor to Swift Boat Veterans for "truth", gets even richer.

Sounds like a racket to me.

I think?


Thanks for the input. (8.00 / 1)
My initial ratings are based on what I know about the measures and from the limited polling out there. I will be sure to revise my descriptions and ratings on them as time goes on and more information and polls become available. I made some revisions to some of the measures already.

My blog


Twitter


Prop 1A (0.00 / 0)
Hey guys, excuse my ignorance, but where is the other $30b for Prop 1A going to come from? The article mentions a $10b bond, but that leaves $30b unaccounted for. Is the cost going to be spread out among a number of years, or is there going to be private funding? I haven't heard much about it until now, so if anyone would like to fill me in, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks,

Scott


Feds and private investors (0.00 / 0)
Both Obama and a bipartisan US Senate coalition are ready to stake down serious coin to help pay for HSR.

A June 2008 report to the California High Speed Rail Authority explained that private investors and companies are VERY interested in this project, especially as it represents an extremely safe investment at a time when such things are a rare commodity. Those investors want the public funding to pay for 65-75% of the overall bill.

The thing is, California has to make the first move. Federal and private funding will not materialize until we throw down our first stake. However, by approving the bond we aren't committing ourselves - Prop 1A has language ensuring that we cannot begin construction until other sources of funding have been secured by preventing bond money from paying more than 50% of construction costs.

More info: California High Speed Rail Blog

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
Thanks (0.00 / 0)
Thanks Robert, that explains a lot!

[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox