[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Newsweek's Ruckus Asks: "What would be the boldest vice presidential choices?"

by: Brian Leubitz

Fri Jul 25, 2008 at 08:22:24 AM PDT


For the last few months, Calitics has been part of the Ruckus Blog on Newsweek. This week we're starting a question feature. The question this week asks who would be a bold pick for John McCain and Barack Obama as VP candidates. This being a California blog, I have some answers for that question.  I'm not going to say these would be good picks, but they will be bold.  McCain: Duncan "wildebeest" Hunter.  Barack Obama: Barbara Boxer.

Duncan Hunter: Let's look at Duncan Hunter first. He's a longtime congressman and first time presidential candidate this cycle.  The man is clearly insane, so much so that he wants to feed the Darfur refugees with wildebeest that he shoots himself.  And that's not all. He wants to turn Santa Rosa Island into a hunting park for, well, anybody that carries enough political clout for him to get through. He tried veterans, then moved to disabled veterans. I'm pretty sure he'll next say that Santa Rosa Island should be a wildebeest hunting refuge for the Darfur refugees next. Or something like that.

Hunter is a conservative's conservative. He won't help you carry California, but he will bring the NRA and a whole slew of gun enthusiasts to your side. He won't bring the votes of military families that have been torn apart by the foolish war in Iraq, but he will bring you Pentagon contractors.  He's real tight with them.  This is a certainly a bold pick.

Duncan Hunter: Conservative, Gun-toting, and Completely Insane. Now, that's Bold.

Barbara Boxer: On the more serious side, Barbara Boxer would be a phenomenal choice to take the lower line of the Democratic ticket. She is enormously popular with the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party (meaning us liberals), and would create an historic ticket. While I'm not sure that Boxer would make up for a Clinton loss, the Obama/Boxer ticket would break boundaries that should have been broken long ago.

Boxer has been fighting for California in the Senate since 1990 and has truly done a phenomenal job. Her leadership regarding climate change has been overshadowed by Al Gore, but has been critical to whatever movement there has been on the issue. She opposed the Iraq War, reinforcing Obama's position.

She's not on the short list, likely because she would be seen as "too liberal" or due to the fact that she's from California, a state where Obama leads by 24 points.  That's a shame. Yet, Boxer would be a truly visionary selection to usher in a new governance that could build a progressive majority for years to come.

Brian Leubitz :: Newsweek's Ruckus Asks: "What would be the boldest vice presidential choices?"
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Boxer would mean a republican senator (0.00 / 0)
Pretty sure that if Boxer was elected VP, Schwarzenegger would appoint her replacement, right? Seems like that issue alone might undermine her as a potential candidate.  

I think you're right (0.00 / 0)
While House & state legislative candidates can have a special anytime, I'm not sure if we do that statewide.  I take it from the case of John Seymour that Arnold's nominee would stick around until 2010. That would stink.

Interestingly, he could appoint himself and move directly from governor to the senate. not sure that he would, but he could.

That all being said, I think there are reasons that Boxer isn't being considered for the job other than our Republican governor, but still, she would be a great VP.


I think?


[ Parent ]
Boldest choice? (0.00 / 0)
Kanye West.

Boxer would be a great choice. (0.00 / 0)
But I'm afraid that would usher in a whole new round of backlash from the Hillary supporters if Obama chose a woman VP and it wasn't Hillary. Jennifer Granholm would be a bold choice. It's too bad she's not eligible due to her being Canadian. But in MI she did help cross the partisan divide and has several Republican supporters.  

"Even if you're on the right track you'll get run over if you just sit there" - Will Rogers

I just don't get that (0.00 / 0)
They'd rather have a man than a woman based only on their gender? It's just crazy.  There are several qualified women for the job, yet because they aren't hillary we'd rather have a man?

Strange.

I think?


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox