[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Something Has To Give

by: Robert Cruickshank

Tue Jun 10, 2008 at 10:00:38 AM PDT


The Field Poll has been surveying Californians' attitudes on Prop 13, and the broader issues of taxes and spending. What they've found is that Californians don't want spending cuts, prefer spending cuts to new taxes - but also are willing to support new taxes if they're the only way to prevent health care cuts.

Frank Russo offers an excellent in-depth look at the poll, which suggests that the public is willing to cut prisons (even though we have to INCREASE spending by at least $7 billion), and supports higher alcohol, cigarette, income, and sales taxes top protect health care.

Reading these poll numbers against the Field Poll's Prop 13 numbers, which indicated ongoing support for Prop 13 and a belief that the state's problems stem from spending and not tax problems it seems clear that there is a massive disconnect among California voters. They cling desperately to the belief that government waste and overspending is the problem of deficits, otherwise they might have to honestly and openly explain that their support for tax cuts is a desire to get government-sponsored tax shelters at the expense of everyone else in society and our state's economic competitiveness.

Frank Russo argued the Field Poll numbers might provide a "road map" forward for the legislature. I agree, although that map suggests confrontation will be the first stop on the trip. Something has to give - Californians cannot maintain their low-tax environment without crippling spending cuts they say they don't want. Republicans will take that to mean a stubborn refusal to increase taxes is popular with voters; they'll not be inclined at all to seek new revenues.

What is really needed is a strong and persistent argument from Democrats - in Sacramento and in the grassroots - that our state has a structural revenue shortfall - that our problems really do stem from a lack of revenue, that a state ranking 46th in per pupil school spending doesn't have any revenue to cut. We need to not shrink away when Californians insist that our problems are on the spending side - those Californians are wrong.

It's especially important to begin with fellow Democrats. The Field numbers suggest that many Democrats are ardent defenders of Prop 13 and believe spending cuts are preferable to tax increases. These Democrats should be the target of a broad-based and long-term campaign to show them the error of this thinking - that their Democratic values are not compatible with these thoughts on budgeting.

It won't be easy, but it is necessary if we are to fix this state.

Robert Cruickshank :: Something Has To Give
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
education is good, but we need a constitution that works (0.00 / 0)
Putting in play Article 18 during the budget obstruction uproar would make 2009 a year of hope for Californians.

Twitter: @BobBrigham

Voters aren't willing to face reality (0.00 / 0)
Ironic as it may be, this quote from Gray Davis seemed spot-on to me when I read it:
Throughout America, the public is living beyond its means. However, there is no appetite to send the government more of their discretionary income. Elected officials have to come to terms with that. People want services. People want their programs financed. But they don't want to send any more money to Sacramento or Washington.


Things are changing (0.00 / 0)
People are beginning to realize that tax cuts don't necessarily replace the lost income that results from K-12 and higher ed cuts. People realize that maybe government health care is a better deal than private insurance. That government-subsidized mass transit saves them more money than $5 gas.

Californians aren't yet where they need to be on those issues, but we also have a precious opportunity to push them in the right direction. It would be a shame if we lost that opportunity. We are where we are because Howard Jarvis and his band of wingnuts seized their moment in 1978. We must do the same.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
Re: Things are changing (0.00 / 0)
I hope you're right - and of course it's up to us to help people realize these things - but there are still a lot of people out there who find it easier to blame the government for "wasting" money than to actually educate themselves on the issues.

[ Parent ]
Gray Davis's opinion on anything political is... (0.00 / 0)
....to be charitable, highly suspect. The guy would still be Governor if he knew what was going on.

The problem here is the same as we see everywhere we look. Ignorant, lazy Democrats are content with their role as punching bag for the Republicans.

How about going on the offensive for a change and haranguing the voters about what the Republicans  are up to, the transfer of  wealth to the uber-rich though the tax mechanism.

How about using the facts to break down the myth that 'Oh, I'm going to be rich someday and I don't want to pay taxes....'

How about shaming folks into it, 'Are prepared to let you kids get sick and die because you don't want to pay taxes?'

How about big-assed pie charts showing where the dough goes? How many voters actually realize how much money the gulag prison system soaks up?

Show them!

Quit whining and Push Back!


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox