[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

The Most Important Office You May Know Nothing About

by: David Dayen

Sun May 04, 2008 at 13:41:41 PM PDT


Yesterday I spent some time at an often contentious debate in the race for the 2nd District of the LA County Board of Supervisors.  The two most high-profile candidates for the seat, State Sen. Mark Ridley-Thomas and former LAPD Chief and current City Councilman Bernard Parks, squared off in a pretty lively debate which featured a lot of sniping and criticism.

Why the heated exchanges in a county Board of Supervisors race?  Why is a state Senator and a very highly recognized City Councilman running in this race?  Why is Sheila Kuehl planning to run for the Board of Supes when Zev Yaroslavsky's term is up in the near future?

Because these are unbelievably powerful positions.

David Dayen :: The Most Important Office You May Know Nothing About
Los Angeles County has 10.3 million residents, over a quarter of the whole state.  The county covers 88 cities and multiple unincorporated areas.  Ridiculously enough, there are only five seats on the county Board, meaning that each Supervisor represents over two MILLION people, more than 15 states and the District of Columbia.  I have to assume that these are the biggest districts in terms of population anywhere in the country.  Right now, seats on the board are held by Gloria Molina, Yvonne Brathwaite Burke, Zev Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe and Michael Antonovich.  LA County is immense and rich in diversity, the most in the nation according to the last US Census.  Burke, Knabe and Antonovich's seats are up for re-election this year, but a sitting Supervisor actually getting challenged in a race is a rare event indeed.  Before term limits (now 3 terms or 12 years), the seat was practically a lifetime position.  The winner of the Parks/Ridley-Thomas race in the 2nd District will yield only the third Supervisor to hold that seat since 1952.

Given all this, what exactly does the Board of Supervisors do?  Well, the Board is the largest public employer in the state of California, serving 102,000 employees, including control of the pension funds.  They also provide services for the entire county, managing county lockups, county hospitals and a host of social services.  It's a mammoth job and I can't for the life of me imagine why it still contains only a 5-member board other than the fact that it increases incumbency protection.  When these seats are contested, the dollar sums are outrageous.  Parks and Ridley-Thomas raised well over six figures in the first quarter of 2008, and labor is spending immense amounts in favor of the state Senator.

Using a political tool that sidesteps campaign financing limits, Los Angeles labor unions have raised an unprecedented $2.5 million to elect state Sen. Mark Ridley-Thomas to the county Board of Supervisors.

Before voters head to the polls in June, union officials say they will add an additional $1.5 million to the "independent expenditure committee" pot.

"It is a tribute to my colleagues and brothers and sisters in labor," said Tyrone Freeman, the head of Service Employees International Union Local 6434, one of the contributors to the Alliance for a Stronger Community.

Obviously, an office with such sway over public employees and county service contracts will catch the eye of labor, and they've gone almost all in for Mark Ridley-Thomas.  Councilman Parks voted against creating a living wage zone around LAX-area hotels, and has a history of pro-business policies on the City Council.  In yesterday's debate, he sidestepped the question by saying that the zone shouldn't be confined to the LAX area, while Ridley-Thomas said outright that "a lving wage law is a tool to fight poverty" and any effort to extend it ought to be taken.

It's a very interesting race.  Parks has the higher profile and the support of a lot of local leaders, including Yvonne Burke, who has held the seat for 16 years.  Ridley-Thomas has the support of the entire Democratic caucus of the State Senate (every single one of them is down on his endorsement list) and much of the Assembly.  Parks has Maxine Waters' support, and Ridley-Thomas has Diane Watson's (she ran against Burke for the seat 16 years ago and lost).  The district includes Mar Vista and Culver City all the way down to South LA and Watts, the majority of residents in the district actually have Spanish surnames, yet this is a major contest in the African-American political community.

And these two appear to really, really not like each other.  The first question in the debate was about gang violence and gang activity, and while Parks stressed youth development and afterschool programs, Ridley-Thomas slyly noted that "some would say that the Los Angeles Police Department acted as a gang during Rampart" (a reference to a major scandal that happened under Parks' watch as police chief).  It went pretty much downhill from there, with Parks claiming that Ridley-Thomas applauded the closure of King-Drew Medical Center and made sweetheart deals with developers as a City Councilman; with Ridley-Thomas hitting Parks on all sorts of issues (health care, environment, labor) and saying "He will know what leadership looks like when it's working," and on and on.  There are differences between the candidates, particularly on issues like the living wage ordinance, but both are stressing economic development for their depressed district, investments in education and health care access, transportation issues (even congestion pricing).

The fierceness of the contest reflects the importance of the race, and the fact that they're running for what amounts to a 12-year term.  It may not be a sexy seat for progressives to pay attention to, but it has an incredible amount of importance.

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Not just LA County (0.00 / 0)
I'm glad you've put this post up, because Californians' attention needs to be more strongly focused on county government. County supervisors are among the most important politicians in the state. In most counties they directly oversee social services, jails and police, and land use. Additionally, county boards of supervisors are typically a farm team for the state legislature - it is very common for a county supervisor to get elected to the state assembly, for example. (LA County is an unusual case given the job security and power of their supervisor positions.)

Given the power and long-range importance of this positions they deserve more attention from progressives. But it's difficult to attract that attention primarily because these races are nonpartisan. Voters and even progressives instinctively understand a "Democrat vs. Republican" race, but when the campaign is between folks who don't or can't advertise a party allegiance, it's easy for progressives to get confused.

Here in Monterey County we have an extremely contentious but very important race for the 4th Supervisorial district (Seaside, Marina, south Salinas). It pits Jane Parker, a progressive and former head of the largest Planned Parenthood branch in the country, against Ila Mettee-McCutcheon, a Republican friend of developers.

Parker came within 200 votes of winning the seat in 2004 but lost to pro-development Jerry Smith. Smith died last year and Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed Mettee-McCutcheon to the seat, to give her the advantage of incumbency. Parker supports smart growth that respects our environment, farmland, and strained water supplies and is built around sustainable transportation. Mettee-McCutcheon was until this year the mayor of Marina, which has embraces the reckless policies of endless sprawl - even here in 2008, when the foolishness of sprawl should have become clear to everyone.

Parker's victory is essential to get a progressive, smart-growth majority on the Monterey County Board of Supervisors (especially if Simón Salinas gets elected to the Senate in the Denham recall). It's not the kind of race that gets attention - but it is the kind of race that should get attention from progressives, especially if we are serious about building a political movement at every level of government in this country.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


A Note On The History Of This Seat (5.00 / 1)
When Watson ran against Burke in 1992, Waters backed Burke, who was widely seen as the white establishment candidate.  Waters both gave Burke street cred, and sideswiped the only other politician around who had a street rep to rival hers.

But it wasn't just the race.  The election result was bogus on its face.  This was the first contested race in decades--the seat having been held by Kenneth Hahn (James and Janice's father) since sometime back in the late Jurasic.  And yet, there were some precincts in which the there were more votes for Water Board than for Supervisor!  I got roped into an investigation, for which I did a good deal of the statistical analysis, as well as the writing.  The statistical evidence for fraud was overwhelming--and we felt it was quite sufficient to warrant a full-fledged investigations, exmining physical evidence for maniupulation of voting machines, and deposing everyone in sight.

But, of course, for any legal action to be taken, the COUNTY DA, Gil Garceti, had to sign off on it.  And he just couldn't manage to find anyone objective to review our findings, despite the proximity of a couple of obscure, but nonetheless well-regarded schools, name of UCLA and USC--not to mention Cal Tech, all three of which, I have it on good authority, actually employ people who know a thing or two about statistics.

Funny how that works.

So, it's interesting to once again see Waters backing the more conservative conservative candidate against the more progressive one.  Once again looking out to see that she has a minimum of rivals for her role as tribune of the people.


la county needs... (0.00 / 0)
la county needs way more supes than it has, unlike SF which could lose a few...that is a ministate bigger than several states with electoral votes and yet only a few regents preside over the board?

it also needs district elections and it needs to enforce some serious campaign finance reform. You basically have a feudal system in LA County and it's just awful. Tin-bucket governors in shithole states have more accountability than in fucking LA County!

--
www.gregdewar.com


oh an bernie parks is a supreme bullshitter (0.00 / 0)
this guy is a fucking idiot , and does not deserve a promotion

http://www.gregdewar.com/2004/...

http://www.gregdewar.com/2005/...

http://www.gregdewar.com/2005/...

--
www.gregdewar.com


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox