[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

California House Races Roundup - April 2008

by: David Dayen

Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 15:47:12 PM PDT


Getting this one in under the wire.  On the last day of April, with just over a month to go until the June primaries, and six months to go until Election Day, there's a lot going on all over the state in the Congressional races.  Of the 19 seats in California currently held by Republicans, 17 will be contested in the fall, and some strongly so.  And we now have a full 34 Democrats with the election of Jackie Speier early in the month, and only one of them is a serious challenge.  We also have the first quarter of 2008 fundraising numbers, which will raise some eyebrows.  You can track these races yourself with the 2008 Race Tracker wiki.

A note: I'm mainly getting my numbers on cash-on-hand competitiveness from the Swing State Project.  Fundraising information comes from the FEC.

Here we go...

David Dayen :: California House Races Roundup - April 2008
DEMOCRATIC SEATS

1. CA-11. Incumbent: Jerry McNerney.  Main challenger: Dean Andal.  Cook number: R+3.  % Dem turnout in the Presidential primary: 53.7%.  DCCC defended.  Well, we're seeing today the San Jose Mercury News reporting that this race is a "pure tossup."  I don't know where they're getting that from.  There's no question it'll be competitive, but I look at the metric of fundraising in the first quarter, and I see that Andal, who is supposed to be the number one challenger for Republicans this cycle, couldn't manage to raise more than $90,000.  That's not really the numbers of a formidable opponent.  He trails McNerney in cash-on-hand by a 2-1 margin and will need significant outside expenditure support to win.  He's getting some of that, but the DCCC isn't abandoning McNerney either, already putting together their Radical Andal site, designed to paint the challenger as an extremist in the pocket of corporate lobbyists.  I'm sure they'll bring up these ties to Don Young's PAC, arguably the most corrupt member of Congress there is.  Both sides are headed door to door in the district, and McNerney is picking up a nice issue with the "Helping Our Veterans Keep Their Homes Act of 2008."  The district is turning quite blue, and I like McNerney's chances to hold the seat.

REPUBLICAN SEATS

I'm going to do three tiers in setting apart the top seats where we have challenges to Republican incumbents.

First Tier

1. CA-04.  Last month: 1.  Open seat.  Dem. challenger: Charlie Brown.  Repub. challengers: Doug Ose, Tom McClintock.  PVI #: R+11.  % Dem turnout in primary: 44.7.  DCCC targeted.  Charlie Brown is the John McCain of this Congressional cycle.  He's sitting back and reaching voters while his opponents bruise and batter each other.  The differences are that Brown is a better candidate and he has a bigger money advantage.  But he must be sitting back and laughing right now.  Doug Ose has gone after Tom McClintock drawing welfare from the state of California in the form of per diem payments.  McClintock called Ose a liberal Democrat.  Most of the headlines in the race have headlines like McClintock, Ose Attack Each Other.  Neither of them are from the district - McClintock won't even be able to vote for himself in the primary - and in the meantime, lifelong resident Charlie Brown is making things happen.  He's mobilizing volunteers in district offices.  He's continuing to donate campaign funds to groups that provide support from veterans.  And he's drawing on important support, like this message from area veterans.

Last week, something unprecedented in our country's history happened here in Roseville. While politicians in both parties used the Iraq War Anniversary for pontificating and armchair quarterbacking, a local candidate for office (himself a 26-year vet with a son going back for his fifth rotation in Iraq) made good on a pledge to donate 5% of money raised in his congressional campaign to non profit organizations helping veterans and families in need. He gave away $17,500 last Thursday - just a down payment [...]

As veterans, we would hope that the voters of District Four understand that tough talk by career politicians usually masks the coward within. Ose and McClintock are birds of a feather, flocking together.

We are soldiers. We believe in keeping promises. We believe in leading by example. We believe that patriotism trumps partisanship, action speaks louder than words, and we know, first hand what it takes to defend America. And for all of these reasons and more, we are proudly supporting Retired Lt. Col. Charlie Brown for Congress.

Powerful stuff.  And another reason you shouldn't believe the hype that this district is hopeless - Charlie Brown is ready to win.

2. CA-26.  Last month: 2.  Incumbent: David Dreier.  Challenger: Russ Warner.  PVI #: R+4.  % Dem. turnout: 50.2.  DCCC targeted.  On the financial front, Warner came close to raising as much as Dreier in the 1st quarter ($136,000 to $110,000), but Dreier still has a big well of cash to draw from.  So the key for Warner is to find and exploit areas of weakness.  One of them is health care.  Warner vowed to forego the Congressional health care package until his constituents are fully covered - a very smart tactic that forces Dreier to confront the issue.  He also used the anxiety around the housing crisis to note that Dreier took $12,000 in contributions from members of Countrywide Financial while voting against aid for homeowners.  This is particularly salient given that Countrywide was basically looking past lying on applications in order to drive people who couldn't afford it into risky loans.  For his part, Dreier is trying to pin high gas prices on Democrats, when he's voted time and again against reining in record oil company profits and removing their subsidies.  Warner is running a pretty smart campaign thus far, and clearly Dreier knows he's in for a fight.

3. CA-50.  Last month: 3.  Incumbent: Brian Bilbray.  Challengers: Nick Leibham, Cheryl Ede.  PVI #: R+5.  % Dem. turnout: 50.8.  DCCC targeted.  I like Nick Leibham's motto at the top of his website: "I am running for Congress because I want to be proud of my government again."  Local op-ed columnists think he might indeed have reason to be proud come November - Logan Jenkins think the race isn't separated by more than a few points.  Leibham had decent fundraising in Q1 and is only a couple hundred thousand dollars behind Brian Bilbray in cash-on-hand.  We know that Bilbray will try to make this a single-issue race on immigration and I say let him.  It's getting him headlines in the district like Bilbray strikes out on the Constitution.  Cheryl Ede is running a strong grassroots campaign and endorsed the Responsible Plan to end the war in Iraq.  If there's one beef I have with Leibham it's an unwillingness to be bold and run his campaign on contrasting policies.  Hopefully he'll learn this lesson.

Second Tier

4. CA-45.  Last month: 4.  Incumbent: Mary Bono Mack.  Challengers: Paul Clay, David Hunsicker, Julie Bornstein.  PVI #: R+3.  % Dem. turnout: 51.3.  Julie Bornstein, former Assemblywoman and affordable housing expert, got into this campaign late but she was still able to raise around $30,000 in a matter of weeks.  Add to that some money from prior election accounts and she's already within a couple hundred thousand dollars in cash on hand of Mary Bono Mack, whose fundraising has been anemic this year.  I don't think she's taking this race seriously, but Bornstein is rounding up all the key endorsements, from the Senators Boxer and Feinstein, the CDP, labor, et al., and she's going to run a strong race.  She does need a website - if she has one, I can't find it (UPDATE: via soyinkafan in comments, here it is!).  Paul Clay and David Hunsicker are also running.

5. CA-03.  Last month: 6.  Incumbent: Dan Lungren.  Challenger: Bill Durston. PVI #: R+7. % Dem turnout: 51.8.  It should have raised eyebrows throughout the country when Fourthbranch Dick Cheney came out from his undisclosed location to appear at a fundraiser for Dan Lungren.  Cheney doesn't visit districts where the Democrat doesn't have a shot, and this was WAY early for someone in Washington to be sounding the alarm button.  Maybe they noticed that Lungren only raised around $100,000 in the first quarter, nearly matched by Bill Durston's $75,000.  Durston was quick to respond to the Cheney fundraiser, too.

Dr. Bill Durston, Lungren's Democratic opponent for House of Representatives in California's 3rd Congressional District, states, "The fact that Dan Lungren would have Dick Cheney as his special honored guest at a fundraiser is one more demonstration of the fact that Lungren is in virtual lock step with the Bush/Cheney Administration."

It's the old Cheney/Bush double bind; they help raise money, but most voters don't want to see you and Darth Cheney or W. in the same room.  With more favorable numbers headed Durston's way, this race continues to get more and more competitive.

6. CA-46.  Last month: 5.  Incumbent: Dana Rohrabacher.  Challenger: Debbie Cook (Responsible Plan endorser). PVI #: R+6.  % Dem. turnout: 47.2.  This is amazing.  Debbie Cook outraised Dana Rohrabacher in the first quarter of 2008.  Cook didn't even enter the race until mid-January, and yet she won the fundraising battle.  Either Rohrabacher isn't paying attention or people are tired of his act.  And the cash-poor NRCC isn't going to be able to pull these candidates out of the fire anymore.  Debbie Cook is opening her first campaign office in Huntington Beach this coming weekend, and she's going to run a strong race about energy, global warming and the environment.  We'll see if Rohrabacher can keep up.  It was notable that Rohrabacher attacked the cost of the war in Iraq during the Petraeus/Crocker hearings.  He knows he's vulnerable.

Third Tier

7. CA-42.  Last month: 8.  Incumbent: Gary Miller.  Challengers: Ron Shepston (Responsible Plan Endorser), Ed Chau, Michael Williamson.  PVI #: R+10.  % Dem. turnout: 44.0.  Disclosure: I do some netroots work for Ron Shepston.  Another amazing number - Ed Chau outraised Gary Miller in Q1.  The numbers are paltry - $39,000 to $36,000 - but it suggests that Miller doesn't care, isn't paying attention, or can't find anyone to give his corrupt ass a buck.  Add all the Democratic challengers up together and Democrats outraised Republicans significantly out here.  And the primary should be interesting.  Ed Chau got labor endorsements but most of his work has been fairly under-the-radar.  Ron Shepston's grassroots efforts may be able to pull the primary out, and he is starting to raise money.  Shepston has Ambassador Joe Wilson coming out for a fundraiser next month.  Michael Williamson has been quiet other than this attack Web ad hitting Ed Chau for not living in the district.    Gary Miller actually backed Barney Frank's housing bill, which suggests that the mortgage mess is a REAL problem in the district.  Jonathan Weil at Bloomberg attacked Miller for trying to hide the extent of the mess from the public.

8. CA-52.  Last month: 7.  Open seat.  Repub. challengers: several, including Duncan D. Hunter.  Dem. challengers: Mike Lumpkin, Vicki Butcher.  PVI #: R+9.  % Dem. turnout: 47.2.  Mike Lumpkin has Max Cleland coming in for a fundraiser with him this week, and he raised a decent amount of money last quarter.  Here's an overview of the race; Lumpkin apparently endorsed removing "half the troops" from Iraq, which seems to me to be a silly idea, but his background as a Navy SEAL and liaison between Congress and the Special Ops Command gives him at least some facility with the region.  This is a tough seat, especially going against what amounts to a legacy candidate.  And Hunter has a lot more money.  Vicki Butcher is a grassroots-oriented candidate who will get her share of votes in the primary.  There was actually a candidate forum in this race yesterday.  Any reports out there?

9. CA-24.  Last month: 9.  Incumbent: Elton Gallegly.  Challengers: Jill Martinez, Mary Pallant (Responsible Plan endorser).  PVI #: R+5.  % Dem. turnout: 50.6.  Marta Jorgensen has quit the race and backed Jill Martinez.  Unfortunately, the primary fight here has turned a little nasty, with Jill Martinez stretching the truth about Mary Pallant's positions and her own finances.  Neither candidate raised a lot of money last quarter but Martinez claimed she had, despite her bank account being in the red.  Pallant is working the progressive grassroots to win the nomination, winning the endorsements of Democrats.com's David Swanson and author Norman Solomon.  I'd love to see a true progressive take on Elton Gallegly.  He wants to drill in ANWR.  He's not that bright.

10. CA-41.  Last month: 11.  Incumbent: Jerry Lewis.  Challengers: Tim Prince, Dr. Rita Ramirez-Dean.  PVI #: R+9.  % Dem. turnout: 46.3.  Jerry Lewis has become the point man on forcing retroactive immunity for the telecom companies back into the House for a vote.  In his speech he assailed trial lawyers for wanting to sue the phone companies, which is funny because at a million dollars his legal defense fund has put several trial lawyers' kids through college.  Of bigger note here is that Republicans in San Bernardino County now number under 40% and Democrats are within 8,000 voters of retaining the majority.  The district is changing, and we'll see if Tim Prince or Rita Ramirez-Dean can capitalize.  I do like Rita's website and use of Web video.

11. CA-44.  Last month: 10.  Incumbent: Ken Calvert.  Challenger: Bill Hedrick (Responsible Plan endorser).  PVI #: R+6.  % Dem. turnout: 49.3.  Bill Hedrick endorsed the Repsonsible Plan this month, which certainly helps raise his profile a bit.  He's holding fundraisers and trying to make voters aware of his presence headed into the general election.  Ken Calvert is gearing up for re-election by requesting all kinds of porkbarrel projects.

12. CA-25.  Last month: 12.  Incumbent: Buck McKeon.  Challenger: Jacquese Conaway.  PVI #: R+7.  % Dem. turnout: 50.9%.  I threw this in because this is yet another seat where Democratic turnout outpaced Republican turnout in February.  This seat also includes a portion of San Bernardino County (see CA-41).  McKeon has a substantial money advantage.  He, by the way, "wants the victory" in Iraq.  That must be nice, thinking about foreign policy like it's an NBA playoff game.

13. CA-48.  Last month: 13.  Incumbent: John Campbell.  Challenger: Steve Young.  PVI #: R+8.  % Dem. turnout: 45.1.  I'll keep including this race because I really like Steve Young.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
it blows my mind that CA-03 is close (6.00 / 4)
hopefully durston will get the DCCC help he needs to make a race of it. i suspect '08's going to be a high tide for democratic challengers, might as well push our advantage and see what falls our way.

the price of gas and foreclosures have got to be hurting the district as well.


Julie Bornstein's website (6.50 / 6)
It's not fully fleshed out yet, but here's what she has so far:

http://www.juliebornstein.com/

Favorite quote from her conversations with Democrats so far:

After multiple community events her kids finally protested, "Mom, do we have to be Jewish AND Democrats?"

I'm union staff, but not a spokesperson for my union - all posts represent my views solely.


Thanks for the link, dd ! (5.67 / 3)
He's (Brown) not sitting back and laughing... he's not taking anything for granted, and as you can see, he's working seriously at making more voter contacts and engaging them.  But I bet all the Republicans (some of whom dropped out already) thought they could just waltz into each CA- 04 county once or twice for a photo opp, and then book a ticket to DC.

Particularly hilarious is Doolittle showing up in Oroville to get some sort of "retirement" appreciation doohicky award mentioning all the things he's done for them, on the same day as McClintock was up there campaigning, channeling Reagan's ghost,  but apparently passing like ships in the fog of the bay. Doolittle said he wanted to get Oroville some money for a .... Veteran's Memorial .... Park.  Now, we all like parks, some of us very much, but is this for the homeless vets to sleep under the benches?

Ose, meanwhile, is working in tandem with Lungren to get back on the Appropriations committee.   Which means one thing... Ose thinks he needs to appropriate more federal funding to ... himself. Then he can continue to fund himself for the race.

Go Dr. Durston!

Max Cleland, the fmr Senator fr Georgia and fmr Veterans Adminstration guy, will be in Sacramento Thursday morning at the Sheraton Grand downtown, May 1st, fr 8am to 9:30 am for a Town Hall Meeting with Charlie Brown.  


Great (4.50 / 2)
That's great that Max Cleland is coming to town.  An American hero, and someone who can talk in minute detail about the deception and slander of the Republican establishment, and he can make a great case for why getting responsible Democrats elected is so important.  

[ Parent ]
It's about the money (4.00 / 1)
To say Miller and Rohrabacher are not paying attention because of their first quarter amounts is misleading.

According to the FEC Miller has $870,000 cash on hand. Compare that to Chau's $32,000 (not including the $19,000 debt he has) and Shepston's $10,000 (not including the $5000 debt he has) cash on hand. Minus the debt that is only $18,000 combined. Miller has almost 45 times that.

According to the FEC Rohrabacher has $330,000 on hand while Debbie only has $32,000. But at least she doesn't have any debt.

It is good we have candidates in all of these races but we need to focus our money on defending the 11th and winning the 4th. The primaries in the 42nd and 46th will probably take all of the money these challengers have raised leaving them without enough to come close to the incumbents in money for November.


No primary in the 46th (4.00 / 3)
so that's not a concern.

Obviously the CoH numbers are a problem, but it is striking that Republicans are raising money at the level of fringe challengers.  The less they have, the less they can give to endangered races across the country.  It's how you gain power in Washington.  That they can't do it shows weakness.  And of course you never know what scandals might reveal themselves, particularly in the case of Miller.

We have the opportunity in a realignment election with a favorable top of the ticket to play in multiple seats.  I'd say everything in the first tier ought to demand our attention.



[ Parent ]
Gary Miller - Latest Cash On Hand: $870,673 (3.00 / 1)
I am really sorry, but when Republicans don't have a primary challenger and but their Dem opponents do then: "Republicans are raising money at the level of fringe challengers" means nothing.

In Miller's race, the guy has $870,673 in the bank and to say that it shows weakness by having some "fringe" candidates not even individually raise 5% of that amount, is laughable.

The freshmen Dems are going to be looking over their shoulders more that longtime incumbent GOPers will, sadly.  Look at how a few are having to run away from Obama.


[ Parent ]
Actually, there is. (3.00 / 1)
His name is Dan Kalmick.

http://www.kalmick2008.com/

I agree with your point about supporting the first tier. That is part of my point. Our money should go to the first tier, not third tiers like those in the 42nd.


[ Parent ]
thanks! (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for doing these dday. I can't believe how many "that would be great, in our dreams" races are becoming honest-to-goodness competitive. I love it!

Thanks, DDay! (0.00 / 0)
Thanks so much for doing this, DDay. I look forward to this roundup, and I'm SO proud to have 4 viable Democratic challengers from OC CDs in this cycle! If we take even one of these OC seats it will be like a 9.0 earthquake.

(I'm also really excited about the chances of Walt Minnick, husband of my friend A.K. Minnick, in Idaho 1. Go Walt!)

Two questions: what is a Cook number, and what's PVI?  


CPVI (0.00 / 0)
The Cook Partisan Voting Index is a measure of partisan electoral performance compared to the national average.  It averages the difference between the way a district votes for President and the national average.  It was developed by Charlie Cook, though clearly anyone can do it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

http://www.cookpolitical.com/

Note, however, that this is based only on Presidential elections, which aren't perfect predictors of local races.  Clearly, it matters more in a Presidential cycle, but even so, people can be persuaded to split their ticket by well run campaigns.  From time to time on Calitics, someone posts information about state and federal races with numbers broken down including how a district votes for governor and senators, which may be a better indication of partisan lean.  


[ Parent ]
I post that information (8.00 / 1)
as soon as the Secretary of State's site shows updated registration numbers.

Here is my most recent diary, using the April registration numbers.

http://calitics.com/showDiary....

My blog


Twitter


[ Parent ]
That's the stuff (8.00 / 1)
Cali_Girl, thanks for doing that, it's a great service, and a good insight into the baseline's for legislative districts.  Does the SoS break down state wide results by Assembly district?  I assume they must for you to get that info, but I've never seen it.  I'll have to take a look.  

I don't know how State legislature districts overlap with Congressional seats, but over all it's clearly good news for us.  If anyone has better insight on how some of those assembly districts overlap potential targets at the Congressional level, I'd love to see some analysis.  I'm getting more optimistic that this could shape up into a great year for CA Dems.


[ Parent ]
Yes (0.00 / 0)
The SoS site does give the presidential, gubernatorial and senatorial results by Senate and Assembly districts.

My blog


Twitter


[ Parent ]
let's separate the Primary candidates by relative strength (0.00 / 0)
I really appreciate these roundups as the readers can get an appreciation of the total picture, but one can get a distorted view of the relative viability of each of Democratic Primary challengers without all the key facts on the table. For example, in CA-50, Nick Leibham has been endorsed by the State and San Diego Party (77% of the vote in the CD caucus), has been endorsed by the Labor Council representing over 100 local unions and 122,000 members, has been endorsed by the League of Conservation Voters San Diego, has been endorsed by Planned Parenthood, and has been endorsed by Francine Busby who ran a spirited race last time against Bilbray. Nick Leibham has raised over $300,000 in addition to attracting the attention of the local newspaper columnist who calls the General Election race between Leibham and Bilbray a toss-up. Leibham, a former criminal prosecutor, has taken a stronger stand than the "Responsible Plan" on ending American vulnerability in the War. Leibham has called for the removal of all troops by a fixed timetable of December 2009. The "Responsible Plan" is quite weak in that respect, makes no mention of any deadline, and leaves it up to the usual "conditions on the ground". When are the Iraqis going to be told that it time they took responsibility for securing their own country? Meanwhile, there is a Primary opponent who had a grand total of $38 in cash in her official FEC account at the end of the March 08 quarter. Democrats have a real opportunity to make important gains in November if we unite behind viable candidates, and if Primary voters are not distracted by fringe candidates who, while well-intentioned, are not remotely capable of mounting effective campaigns against well-funded Republican incumbents in normally Republican CDs. It is not only about "the money". Coalitions of Party activists, labor, environmental and pro-choice organizations, together with strong fund raising and Democratic candidates who can attract broad appeal rather than idealogical purity on every issue, can win elections THIS November against otherwise entrenched Republicans because the country is ready to install a new team in Washington. The country is ready, but is the Democratic Party of California ready to lead with realism? I believe this website can help to provide that leadership.  

You provide some excellent data (0.00 / 0)
But you forgot endorsed by Donna Frye.

;-)


[ Parent ]
It's a Roundup. A Roundup. (8.00 / 2)
The idea isn't to give detailed info about any primary contest. CA 50 isn't the only one listed in which there's a competitive primary.

If you have a bunch to say about Leibham (as you apparently do), why not write a diary?


[ Parent ]
Why not (0.00 / 0)
Let the process play out?  Leibham looks like he's in a position to clean up in the primary, and it's only 4 weeks away.  There will be plenty of time to consolidate his campaign and start getting to voters with a general election message.  

If he can raise all that money, and has the strong message you say he does, then a primary shouldn't be the worry.  This is an opportunity to speak to committed Democratic voters and make his case before turning to the bigger picture.  


[ Parent ]
When are you guys finally going to give Mike Lumpkin in the 52nd some love? (0.00 / 0)
With a state Dem. party endorsement of 92%, endorsements from labor, teachers, firefighters, Planned Parenthood, letter carriers, SEIU, all regional Democratic clubs, Jim Webb, Max Cleland, Michael Capuano, Gene Taylor and others, you'd think he'd be in your top 3 at least.  He raised more money than all candidates, but the encumbant's son last quarter and has a background as a Navy SEAL and combat veteran that can get him enough cross-over votes to win in this conservative district.

The debate on Tuesday was the first time candidates from all parties were allowed to square off.  Lumpkin came out as the clear winner.  Duncan Hunter Jr. looked nearvous and uncomfortable, like he didn't want to be there.  Nobody has a clearer platform or better grasp of the issues in this race than Lumpkin does.

You say that bringing 50% of the troops home sounds silly?  Try asking him directly.  His position on the war makes a lot of sense if you read more than just what the Union Tribune prints. Lumpkin's experience as a Special Operations Commander gives him a unique perspective on the war.  His experience and knowledge is a clear contrast to any other candidate in this race.


gjones has a great comment above (0.00 / 0)
Please, if you have this information, write a diary.  As much as we'd like to, we can't be full-on, on the ground experts in all these races. Calitics relies on people who are in the middle of these campaigns to help inform both the editors and the readers. It sounds like you know quite a bit about the 52nd- I imagine a diary on the race would prove to be a fascinating read and go a long way to fleshing out everyone's appreciation for the nuances involved.

[ Parent ]
A Diary, you say? (8.00 / 3)
Will be happy to.  Stay tuned...

[ Parent ]
Fantastic! (0.00 / 0)
Looking forward to it.

[ Parent ]
Bono (8.00 / 2)
I've made this point before, but I'll say it again:  I think that Mary Bono Mack is VERY vulnerable, and isn't in a position right now to defend her seat.  Although they aren't advertising it, Republicans here in DC are worried about her, and have been giving her office extra help through their Conference and the NRCC to try and make sure she is conducting her official business to try and maximize her chances in the district.  To the best of my knowledge, this is unusual and a sign that their party leaders are worried.

Also, I understand that she recently lost someone from the campaign and is down to one person.  People from her DC office may be leaving to go back and work on the California campaign as well.  

Combine this with crap fundraising, and I think this is a chance to steal a seat out from under a bad candidate.  One source of seats for House Democrats in '06 was to simply beat Republicans who were mediocre politicians representing swing districts but had never been challenged.  This happened in Florida, PA (x2), New Hampshire, Kentucky, Kansas and Minnesota that I can think of off hand.  Now we have a chance to do it in California.  


Some facts on the CA-48 (8.00 / 1)
Thank you for including my race in the run down -- I'm ranked lucky 13 in the list.  In the Ca-48 John Campbell's Q-1 fund raising was only $1200 ahead of mine.  It is amazing that the 6th richest man in congress isn't doing it.

Second point:  I have posted on line, a music video that every Democrat should see.  It is a 3 1/2 minute summary of 8 years of Republican Scandals.  You can see it at http://www.actblue.com/page/sc...

Steve Young
"Restoring trust in our government."

http://www.steveyoungforcongre...

Steve Young, Democrat for Congress
Ca-48
"For a fresh start"


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox