[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Luxurious?

by: Andrew Davey (atdleft)

Thu Jul 12, 2007 at 10:57:05 AM PDT


Sometimes, I don't know whether to laugh or cry. A couple of days ago, I opened up OC Metro to discover a feature article about all the major coastal resorts banding together to "brand the waterfront" as the ultimate luxury destination. And of course while looking for the article, I had to see a full-page ad urging me to "wake up to the waves" and "rest to the setting of the sun" at "Brightwater in Huntington Beach", the new luxury housing development that sits just west of the other luxury housing development that sits atop what's supposed to be protected wetlands. But of course, all this OC coastal luxuriousness mustn't end there. I soon find a big ad telling me of all the decadently luxurious scenery awaiting me at the Balboa Bay Club in Newport Beach. No matter where I turn the page in OC Metro, I find all this fabulous luxury. Who would have known that I was living in the lap of luxury here in oh-so-fabulous Orange County?

But wait, does everyone really enjoy the "luxurious lifestyle" in The Land of the OC? Can we afford those new houses sitting dangerously close to protected wetlands? Can we even reach the beach amidst all this development? Can we afford to continue ignoring the dire need for affordable housing in the region? Oh yes, and what about the poor kids who want to go to the beach, but can't thanks to OCTA's refusal to meet the demands of bus drivers who themselves can hardly afford the high cost of living in Orange County?

Follow me after the flip to explore just how luxurious (or not) life really is...

Andrew Davey (atdleft) :: Luxurious?

So how good do we have it here? Well, it depends how much of this "good life" one can afford.

Yesterday, the Coastal Commission decided to not decide yet on the proposed Parkside development. Now Shea Homes has been illegally filling in wetlands in order to plop a bunch of multimillion dollar McMansions there. They claim that they need to build these McMansions in order to alleviate the dire need for housing in Orange County. But is this the type of housing that we really need?

Why must all the new housing be these super expensive developments that encroach upon our open space? Why not work on housing near the areas where we all work? Oh yes, and why not work on housing that most of us can actually afford? People aren't really clamoring any more for McMansions that they can't afford. They need something that they CAN afford. Even the Orange County Business Council realizes that if they want to attract new skilled workers to OC, they'll need to show these workers where they can find a house within their budget. We may very well risk a terrible "brain drain" if we don't do something to ensure that our workforce can actually afford to live here.

Disney doesn't want any affordable housing encroaching upon its resort district in Anaheim. They'll do anything, even throw an initiative to "save the resort district" on the ballot, in order to save their plans for some lovely new luxurious timeshare units. But wait, aren't there already plans for future hotels in the area? And don't all these people who work so hard to keep the magic going at Disneyland deserve a decent place to live that isn't so far away from where they work? Must a place for these workers to call home be an unattainable luxury that's always out of reach?

Oh yes, and speaking of out of reach... Why is it allowable that in addition to affordable housing must always be out of reach to us working people, we must also be unable to reach what's supposed to be our open spaces? Just think about all the recent developments that have eaten up our beaches, our hills, and our wetlands. Much of the Dana Point Headlands will soon be filled with overpriced McMansions. Just across the street from Crystal Cove, the old backcountry is now filled with overpriced McMansions. And of course, the Bolsa Chica Wetlands may have some unwanted new neighbors getting a little too close to the wildlife.

But really, why must we be robbed of our housing and our open space? Why must all the housing be built on our open space, and why can't we be able to live within our means? While there will always be mid-level managers who may have received enough of a salary increase to buy one of these McMansions along the coast, nothing's being done to ensure that all the folks who will be policing the new McMansion neighborhoods and providing fire protection for these McMansions and educating the children residing in the McMansions and caring for the seniors residing in the McMansions will have a place to live. Oh yes, and have we even talked about the poor folks who will have to clean the McMansions and the people cooking for the people living in the McMansions? Where the heck do they go?

And what incentive do all these regular folks serving the needs of the people living in the big McMansions to live in such expensive places like Orange County? Why can't we get to the beach? Oh yes, all the McMansions are getting in the way. Oh, and the people living in the McMansions would rather not see bus service in the area.

So is this all just a luxury that we really can't afford? And is the luxurious lifestyle of a few shutting out the desires and necessities of the many residing here? I wonder sometimes.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Luxurious? | 15 comments
Poor Kids (0.00 / 0)
Can see the beach on field trips just like rich people allow them to see other things like art and theatre and nutritious meals.

On the teevee? (0.00 / 0)
I mean, that's how kids mostly get to see things like art and theatre these days. If they're lucky enough to have a PBS station, they can see it on TV. Will we soon come to the day when the only way for most kids to see our once great California coastline would be to turn on the TV? How sad that would be.

Had enough of the "red county" right-wing crazy-talk bulls***? Well, then come and visit us at The Liberal OC! Yes, there ARE liberals in The OC! : )

[ Parent ]
Not just on teevee (0.00 / 0)
We can load them on a bus and take them out to visit a tree. Just make sure that the bus spews enough crap into the air that the tree dies afterwards.

[ Parent ]
How environmentalist... (0.00 / 0)
Of us. Let's take the kids out to see whatever little green earth we have left, and then destroy that in the process! Ah, the joys of overdevelopment...

Had enough of the "red county" right-wing crazy-talk bulls***? Well, then come and visit us at The Liberal OC! Yes, there ARE liberals in The OC! : )

[ Parent ]
The kids would prefer another Starbucks n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
California => Brazil (0.00 / 0)
At the rate this is going California will come to resemble Brazil, with a few wealthy enclaves hogging all the fun and everyone else living in poverty, without basic services and without access to the region's natural beauty.

The stories you tell about affordable housing remind us why private developers can never be relied upon to provide affordability. Their interest is in making as much money as possible, and McMansions and high-end condos offer that. Affordable townhomes don't.

What should be added to this is the story of the wreckage in the "subprime" market. I put "subprime" in quotes because that's really poor framing. As the stats show, the areas hardest hit by foreclosures are, you guessed it, the most affordable homebuying options. Places like Riverside and Modesto, where folks from the OC and the Bay Area went to find a home they could buy, were full of loans given on a predatory nature. "The market will provide affordability," we were told, and so the market turned to 0% down stated income loans to get folks into houses.

Nevermind that these loans were known to be bad, and that often homebuyers were never told the details of what they were signing, or found themselves given a mortgage that was different than they signed up for. As the cost of living has soared over the last year, as wages remain stagnant and as interest resets take their toll, those who finally scrounged and found affordability are now losing their homes.

California has a housing crisis, and the "market" is a large part of why it exists. We need to find ways to encourage more density in the extant urban cores, to direct developers away from McMansions (closing off coastal and open space to new sprawl is a damn good way to start) and toward providing real affordability.

And ultimately we're going to have to take another look at public housing.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


We don't have to regress... (0.00 / 0)
To third-world status. There is a way to develop and to grow. We just have to figure out how to do it in a smarter way.

Right now, all our open space is being gobbled up by McMansions. Bye, bye coast. Bye, bye hills. Bye, bye everything that makes Orange County so naturally beautiful.

But yet, we can't afford the McMansions. We need a place to live, but not some $2 million gargantuan fortress situated on a teeny-tiny lot with a kinda-sorta peek-a-boo view of the ocean (you have to get on the roof and look through the other McMansion tract closer to the beach). No, we need a practical place to live that's close to work. But yet, Disney doesn't want any in Anaheim. Irvine's just getting started in making available some low-cost units in the business district. Santa Ana's still trying to kick out all the poor brown people downtown to make way for the great white horde that's supposed to come with the new "upscale urban lofts". And now, even the Inland Empire isn't as cheap as it used to be. Basically, there's nowhere left for lower and middle-class people to go to find a place to live. Victorville, perhaps?

So you're right on the mark. Unless we do something soon, we'll be another third-world nation with the extremely rich and the extremely poor, with nothing inbetween. We can't afford to regress. We must progress with more affordable housing, more protection of our coast and wilderness areas, and a more sensible way to develop smarter urban communities for the 21st century.

We can't afford not to.

Had enough of the "red county" right-wing crazy-talk bulls***? Well, then come and visit us at The Liberal OC! Yes, there ARE liberals in The OC! : )


[ Parent ]
It should be a no-brainer (8.00 / 1)
California's coastal wetlands? 90% gone.
California's coastal sage scrub? 95% gone.
California's vernal pools? 97% gone.

I really don't see how we can afford to sacrifice one more acre of open space in Southern California. Maybe if it were in the public interest to do so, I could be persuaded. But Shea et al.'s opportunity to make a few million isn't really in the public interest. This is pure private profiteering at our expense.


I know, shouldn't it? (0.00 / 0)
Open space? Where's that? There's not too much in my neck of the woods! What's REALLY in the public interest is that we continue to enjoy those PUBLIC lands (like Bolsa Chica and the Headlands) by giving us some PUBLIC access that isn't obstructed by all these private McMansion enclaves.

Oh yes, and while we're at it, how about some housing that we can actually afford? And instead of plopping it on what's supposed to be open space, how about filling in some of our urban areas with urban housing that's within our budget? Artists' lofts and high-rise condos are nice, but how many of us can afford $700,000 for a junior one-bedroom? Puh-leeese!

Had enough of the "red county" right-wing crazy-talk bulls***? Well, then come and visit us at The Liberal OC! Yes, there ARE liberals in The OC! : )


[ Parent ]
can I have some mixed-use sustainable housing please? (8.00 / 2)
Why do rich people feel the need to form these little burb-claves? I want to live somewhere with a variety of people and a variety of services within walking distance! Wah!

Because they like bubbles... (8.00 / 1)
They liked to be bublled in their insulated world of privilege, conformity, and comfort. They don't like the strange and the bizarre, those crazy homeless people in Laguna Beach debating the merits of God, those brown people in Santa Ana who don't speak English and listen to that Mexico music. Oh yes, and all that yucky riff-raff can't be let in!

Now I agree with you that I want to live somewhere with real diversity. Class diversity. Racial diversity. Sexual diversity. Oh yes, and somewhere with diverse transit options and a wide variety of stores and services close by. Santa Ana has most of this, and that's why I live here.

We just need to convince more people that they don't have to be afraid of the strange... Turn and face the strange, CHANGE! ; )

Had enough of the "red county" right-wing crazy-talk bulls***? Well, then come and visit us at The Liberal OC! Yes, there ARE liberals in The OC! : )


[ Parent ]
It's not strictly a function of consumer demand (8.00 / 2)
Developers like this approach because their land costs are cheaper, meaning they can make more profit. I too much prefer living with diversity and where I can walk to where I need to go. Many folks do, and wish they could as well - wish they could have shorter commutes and such, but developers aren't as interested in that.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave

[ Parent ]
Well, demand is part of it... (0.00 / 0)
Developers supply the housing. We all demand it. There's stuff that should be done to change the equation on BOTH sides.

How about incentives for developers to build affordable homes in our urban cores? How about incentives for home buyers to ditch the McMansion and get a hip, kewl loft downtown? How about mixing things up, and setting aside some of these new homes for affordable housing? How about offering partial subsidies and tax breaks for lower income families who want to buy these new homes? And for higher income folks, let them know about all the fun amenities that come with these new homes (close to work, and to that new rail line, and that lovely art gallery, and that funky coffee shop that's SOOOO much better than Starbucks)?

This can be done. We just need to be creative about it. ; )

Had enough of the "red county" right-wing crazy-talk bulls***? Well, then come and visit us at The Liberal OC! Yes, there ARE liberals in The OC! : )


[ Parent ]
It's true. (8.00 / 1)
The big problem with capitalism is that while "vote with your wallet" is a great idea, it means the market is always at least one step behind. I can't vote for something that doesn't exist - I have to buy the next-best thing that's actually out there. I know of mixed-use communities in existance but they all seem to be up in Davis and Sacramento. I'm in silicon valley. Never heard of any such here. I suppose I could move. Or work to get the zoning laws changed, I guess!

[ Parent ]
But that's where we need it! (0.00 / 0)
The demand for this type of mixed use urban development is obviously here. It's here in fast urbanizing areas like Silicon Valley and Orange County. But unfortunately, the developers have been slow in giving us some supply.

We actually are starting to see these mixed use developments pop up in Orange County. They've been quite instrumental in reviving Downtown Fullerton as a hip hangout in North OC. Brea has really gone wild in opening this stuff downtown (actually, they've been a little TOO wild and giddy in demolishing local businesses to pave way for Old Navy and Edwards Theater and REALLY pricey "urban lofts" above the Starbucks and the Color Me Mine!). And of course, now Anaheim, Santa Ana, and Irvine are REALLY pushing to make their downtowns feel more "urban" with lofts and high rises and having Jamba Juice RIGHT THERE in the apartment complex!

But wait, there's a problem. All this stuff is still pretty expensive. $500 thousand for an entry-level "studio loft" in Fullerton or one-bedroom condo in Irvine. Pretty pricey for young up-and-comers who may not afford such a costly mortgage payment. And renting an apartment? Got $1,500 for the monthly rent?

So demand's here. We just need to work on supply. More urban neighborhoods AND more aid for lower income people to buy these homes or rent these apartments.

Had enough of the "red county" right-wing crazy-talk bulls***? Well, then come and visit us at The Liberal OC! Yes, there ARE liberals in The OC! : )


[ Parent ]
Luxurious? | 15 comments
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox