[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

SiCKO actually does make me sick-o

by: Brian Leubitz

Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 08:43:05 AM PDT


(Please read this review and make friends with your friends and family to attend the movie when it opens and support SB 840 - promoted by blogswarm)

Well, we went to SiCKO last night, and since we didn't get back until after 1AM, I didn't write a review then.  You can check out my Flickr set by clicking the photo.

Few movies were better titled. Now, I'm not sure if Moore intended the title as in "make you sicko" or "treating the sicko" but either way, it works.  I'm not what you would call a Michael Moore fanboy. I mean, his tactics can be grating and more than a little annoying. But, I think this movie makes his strongest statement yet. To put it shortly, this movie made me sad and frustrated, yet I feel more determined to work for change than ever.

The movie specifically disclaims those who are uninsured, as the opening credits roll, Moore states that the movie is not about those who do their own sutures at home, or those who die waiting for assistance at the few public hospitals. Rather the movie is about the weakest link in our health care delivery system, the insurance companies.  Follow me over the flip...

Brian Leubitz :: SiCKO actually does make me sick-o
I'm no movie critic, so forgive me my lack of Roger Ebert polish.  Now, that out of the way, let me say that the movie was stunning throughout, yet had a few occasions of well, too longness.  And occasionally, it felt like an ad for France.  Hey, I like France as much as the next guy (well probably more than many GOP next guys), but the Francophile bit seemed a bit long.  But with much of his comparisons to other country, he makes one grand point:

We, not me.

Let me repeat that: We, not me. It's a simple, yet powerful refrain. For too long, Reaganists have pushed us to fear the government. As one line in the movie said, roughly paraphrased, "The Americans fear the government, but in France, the government fears the people." You see, we have lived to long in a state of fear, constantly running from one crisis to the next, never wondering why we have such crises. Or how we could prevent ourselves from reaching the levels of poverty that we have achieved in what is supposed to be the richest nation EVER.

So, when Moore goes all Cuba-loving, Franco-philiac and what not, he does it because in those nations he sees the underlying community responsibility.  Or to put it another way, Moore is trying to speak of the commitment that we all make to one another as a neighborhood, a community, a state, and a nation, not to mention our duty to the human race in general.

But the movie doesn't deal only in generalities. It tells stories so horrifying and so pathetic, that it just screams insanity.  Like the story of a mother who lost her toddler due to Kaiser's reluctance to pay an out-of-network, or the 50somethings who have to move into their daughter's basement after co-pays forced them to sell their house. Or the man who found a perfect bone marrow donor, but the health group said the transplant was "expiremental". No, it was abundantly clear that insurance companies are becoming the weak link in our health care delivery, if not the thief in the night. They seek to deny care. That is their job, not to ensure a healthy population, not to "thrive", but to keep their "medical losses" to a minimum.

This movie was powerful, and should be considered on the order of Inconvenient Truth. It should make people stop, think, and wonder if they are next. Or your mother, or your toddler. How many more people will be dumped on the Skid Row, or die for lack of care before we just finally decide that enough is enough. Before we finally decide that we are just plain SiCK of the profit motive in our health care industry, or until we are just SiCKOs.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Great review (8.00 / 1)
I'm definitely looking forward to being there at the premiere on the 29th. Depending on my schedule I hope to be a part of the CNA's festivities.

Your review proves something I've long thought about Michael Moore: he is one of our nation's foremost critics of neoliberalism. Neoliberalism, of course, is the political economy that holds private enterprise can do no wrong, the profit motive is sacrosanct, and every man is an island unto himself. His examples are nations that, hitherto, had resisted neoliberalism (sadly France seems to have finally succumbed to the 30-year siege). That Moore looks to France and Cuba as his examples shows how fundamentally he understands what is wrong with this country. It's not that we need some slight cosmetic changes to the way private insurers deliver care, but that we as a nation, as a society, must band together and see to it that each other's needs are protected and respected.

Your paraphrase about Americans fearing their government as a result of Reaganism is also absolutely key. This entire decade is characterized by fear, nowhere more strongly than in the political arena. We fear our government (and rightly so, as Todd noted yesterday evening), but our politicians fear, well, pretty much everything, and refuse to offer any leadership to change this situation (unless that politician's name is Sheila Kuehl). For political change to happen - real, lasting, effective political change - we must overcome these fears. FDR really did have it right when he said "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself." No more will we tolerate half-measures and weak palliatives passed off as solutions from our politicians. We must lead them where they so far are unwilling or uninterested in going.

PS: If Francophilia is a crime, then I'm one of the biggest offenders around here! ;)

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


Shiela Kuehl is awesome (8.00 / 2)
Now if she would just come to Calitics every now and again...

I think?

[ Parent ]
she should come by (8.00 / 1)
Is this the next best thing?



Twitter: @BobBrigham


[ Parent ]
Let's hope this movie convinces Fabian Nunez to do the right thing... (8.00 / 3)
yesterday was very uncomfortable for him, having to watch a movie about the murder and mayhem committed by the very same insurance companies who have paid him tens of thousands of dollars--and who he is diligently working in return to provide with move customers, influence, revenue, and ability to meddle in the medical decisions that should be left nurses and doctors.

As one Canadian healthcare activist was quoted in the film as saying: "It's never to late to do the right thing."

I am a healthcare activist for the National Nurses Organizing Committee/California Nurses Association.  We are the nation's largest RN union, the nation's fastest-growing union, and leading advocates for single-payer healthcare.


[ Parent ]
I think the dyanmics have totally changed (0.00 / 0)
I really believe this that if the fight for single payer were a pinball machine the "tilt" alarm would have gone off yesterday.

I mean, CW is out the window. The case for SB 840 is now going to be seen by the voters in a very powerful medium.

If Arnold doesn't sign it, CNA should put it on the ballot in February and force all the Democratic candidates to support single payer as a way to catapult California's momentum nationwide.

Single payer couldn't ask for more momentum.

Twitter: @BobBrigham


[ Parent ]
they've disavowed this approach (0.00 / 0)
Kuehl specifically answered my question about ballot measures by saying it's too early and we have to get hospitals and doctors on board before rolling that out.  Remember that single payer plans have failed badly in recent years.  While the Moore film may help, what's needed is a movement to come out of it to continue to build support.

[ Parent ]
When was the last time it was tried? (0.00 / 0)
To my recollection the last time single-payer appeared on the ballot here was in the guise of Proposition 186, in November 1994 - which as we know was not exactly the best moment for progressive causes or Democratic politicians.

Kuehl is surely right that we need to spend some time and effort building a strong coalition and movement before we take the fight to the ballot. But that is probably where it will end up, given the unwillingness of Sacramento to make a serious push for it. I hope our elected officials will be wholly supportive of this when it does go to the ballot.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
I'm actually afraid to watch this movie. (0.00 / 0)
We have good insurance right now, but I know, as a parent, I will freak out after I see this.

totally (0.00 / 0)
You'll freak out. You'll cry. You'll be mad.

But you'll also laugh.

And you'll clap.

Twitter: @BobBrigham


[ Parent ]
So then (0.00 / 0)
Does Moore's over-the-top style help or hinder the underlying point?  It doesn't seem as though much of the public discussion will be regarding the power structure in various countries relative to the people vs. the government, but does the overall attention garnered suck people into the movie and get the point across to them?

More succinctly, how obvious is this point?


It punches you in the face (0.00 / 0)
There is no doubt that insurance companies are the bad guys here.

I think?

[ Parent ]
Great review (8.00 / 1)
I saw the earlier showing with the nurses and posted my own review at California Notes.

A strong point the movie makes is about our fear. We have it all backwards. "The Americans fear the government, but in France, the government fears the people." If we expect to be a government of, by, and for the people, we need to stop being fearful and become fearless -- fearless advocates for what is right and just, fearless advocates for "we," the people.

If you don't walk away from this movie -- let me change that. Don't walk away from this movie, take it with you. Let it move you, let it change you, let it make you fearless. Cry if you will, there is plenty to cry about, but when you leave, be stirred to action -- fearless action.


Fabian Nunez IS doing the right thing (5.00 / 1)
Shum, board a rocketship to Planet Reality. SB 840 is a great bill but it's going to be vetoed, like it has been again and again. And there's no guarantee a Democratic governor will even sign it -- even uber-liberal Phil Angelides didn't embrace it. So instead of attacking pragmatic elected officials who actually want to do something about insuring millions of Californians and making health care affordable instead of just holding rallies on the Capitol steps, maybe CNA should join every other stakeholder (such as SEIU, Health Access, CTA) at the table and try to hammer out a plan.

As the Speaker pointed out yesterday, you can be for single payer and for a plan that Assembly and Senate Democrats are pushing.

It really is shameful that CNA wastes its resources on political ads attacking Democrats who are, in the words of Michael Moore, "doing the right thing."


Steve, they're helping you (8.00 / 2)
so let them talk.  As I've been saying over and over, having groups like CNA on the left flank help to open the Overton Window and allow for better legislation to be eventually passed.  If they weren't there, we'd get something in the middle of the Speaker's plan and Arnold's.  With a strong single payer plank moving the goalposts to the left, it changes the debate, and puts the Nunez plan in the middle instead of on the extreme.  That HELPS you get the best bill.  Surely you've been in government long enough to see that.

[ Parent ]
I really wish (8.00 / 1)
Our elected leadership would spend more of its time working out how to get the best plan made into political reality instead of accepting a flawed plan because you're not willing to help us remake that political reality.

Moore's film is merely the most media-friendly articulation of a point many of us have repeatedly made, which is that any reform that includes the private, for-profit industry is a reform that is doomed to fail. Any proposal that keeps them in the game, then, is surely NOT "doing the right thing" but is instead a stopgap that doesn't really do much to resolve the worsening problems millions of us continue to face. The problem isn't so much a lack of insurance as it is a lack of care, and we can marshal numerous stories of how health insurance has done little to provide actual health or financial stability to a large number of state residents.

As a California voter I don't want to hear that Sacramento Dems are hammering out a compromise. I want to hear that they're hammering out a plan to make SB 840 into law, one way or another - especially if those folks plan to ask me to give them more time in office in February. I want them to start to address the fundamental crisis we're facing instead of continuing to postpone the day we solve them.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
you should kick the nurses' butts (0.00 / 0)
Damn special interest nurses, always wanting to force their way of everyone getting health care...

I think CNA should put it on the ballot and concurrently run recall campaigns against any Democrat who won't fight for it. Not just vote for it, but fight. All the spineless losers, let's put them on call.

Deep pockets and justice are a wonderful combination and CNA has game.

If this is going to go to the ballot because the Speaker can't win on single payer, I hope it goes hard corp. I want accountability. I want ruthless ads against the mod squad. I want to just get it done, any insurance company handout is counterproductive, IMHO.

Let's get it on!

Pragmatism is the last refuge of a wimp to afraid to win

Twitter: @BobBrigham


[ Parent ]
Insurance Industry Mayhem (8.00 / 2)
Steve--Won't AB 8 increase the number of patients who get their healthcare through the very same insurance corporations that SiCKO exposes as dangerous to patients?  How does that help?

I am a healthcare activist for the National Nurses Organizing Committee/California Nurses Association.  We are the nation's largest RN union, the nation's fastest-growing union, and leading advocates for single-payer healthcare.

[ Parent ]
I'm guessing... (3.00 / 2)
he's right in the problems he identifies, but wrong in the conclusion. I won't defend the current insurance system, but I will not agree with abolition of the insurance industry

The Silent Consensus

I don't know how optimistic to be (0.00 / 0)
When Fahrenheit 911 came out, a lot of people thought it would spell the end of the Iraq War, but instead George Bush was reelected. I worry that the days of Upton Sinclair may be long gone.

and didn't win the election (0.00 / 0)
But compare the before and after polls. Nobody other than Blue Dog dipshits and right wing weirdos are in favor of the occupation.

Twitter: @BobBrigham

[ Parent ]
Perspective and context (0.00 / 0)
F9/11 helped to generate a powerful grassroots movement that gave Kerry the strongest showing against an incumbent president short of actually winning. It also helped turn America against the Republicans and the Bush regime, although it took a few years for that process to work itself out.

No one movie, book, or magazine article will immediately change the public mind. But each of them help to incrementally accomplish those shifts. SiCKO alone won't bring us single-payer, that requires a massive political movement, with support in the grassroots, the low information voters, and in the legislative halls. What SiCKO does is to give that movement a huge dose of publicity and a massive kickstart. That is of incredible value.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
dday, i'm fine with their talk ... (0.00 / 0)
...but when they waste members resources on advertising and direct mail and nasty political attacks -- instead of focusing on the legislation -- then just how does that further the debate? If the goal here is to help families, tell me how that helps? I'm all for moving the ball down the field, I just don't agree with their plays.

Steve (8.00 / 1)
Come on, Steve.  It takes political courage to overcome great obstacles. But giving up going in is a violation of bargaining 101 – you stake out a position and fight for it. Citing “reality” is a cop-out for lack of commitment. A plan that includes insurers, lowers the standard for the employer contributions to health care and gives the Governor a political victory – all in service of essentially careerist motives – is not good, it’s bad.

Did you see the film, Steve? The lesson from France was that street protest can make a difference…we may have learned that from other social movements that also confronted the resistance of the dynamic status quo. Moore’s very clear on one point in person and on film: you can’t solve the health care crisis unless you eliminate the private insurers – including the speaker’s partners and funders, Blue Shield, Kaiser and Health Net.

I am a healthcare activist for the National Nurses Organizing Committee/California Nurses Association.  We are the nation's largest RN union, the nation's fastest-growing union, and leading advocates for single-payer healthcare.


[ Parent ]
How does the CA ssytem work now? (0.00 / 0)
Someone told that for my gf and I somehow lost our jobs and/or coverage, our son (way under 18) is still covered under the state system. Is this true?

Here's more info (0.00 / 0)
http://www.healthyfa...

Who can join Healthy Families

Who may qualify?

Children up to their 19th birthday.
Children in the family without employer-sponsored health insurance in the last three months.
Children living in California.
Children who are not eligible for or are enrolled in no-cost Medi-Cal.
Children who meet citizenship or immigration rules.
Children born to mothers enrolled in the Access for Infants and Mothers (AIM) Program, who are not enrolled in the no-cost full scope Medi-Cal Program or employersponsored health insurance.
Children in families with incomes within the Healthy Families Guidelines.
Who can apply?

Parents, legal guardians, stepparents, foster parents or caretaker relatives may apply for insurance for a child living in their home. Only the parents’ income will be considered. If you are a legal guardian, stepparent, foster parent or caretaker relative who lives with a child, your income will not be used to qualify the child for Healthy Families.

If you are age 18 or under, you may qualify to apply for your own insurance if you meet the income requirements.

Minors who do not live with parents, legal guardians, stepparents, foster parents or caretaker relatives may be eligible for Healthy Families for themselves or their children if they meet all other requirements.

What types of papers do I need to send in as proof of my family’s income?

The application form has information on the types of papers required as proof of income.

How do I apply for Healthy Families?

Fill out the application and mail it in the envelope provided. A complete application includes:

All questions answered.
Copies of papers showing your income — see application for examples.
Copies of all other required papers.


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox