[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Use It or Lose It California: Let's Begin

by: Lucas O'Connor

Thu Jun 07, 2007 at 15:14:22 PM PDT


Leading up to the election last November, Chris Bowers initiated the Use It or Lose It project, urging unopposed members of Congress to contribute their money to the DCCC in support of other competitive races.  In addition, I found 64 more districts with token opposition (Republican had raised less than $10,000 total).  California's districts, safely drawn as many of them are, were well represented on these two lists, and while many of California's Democrats were very supportive, not all of them were.  Our representatives have a responsibility to support the party as a whole whenever possible, and sitting on piles of cash is both a waste and a betrayal of good faith.  Here's a look at how the delegation performed so that we can start applying pressure where necessary.
Lucas O'Connor :: Use It or Lose It California: Let's Begin
Let's begin with completely unchallenged Democrats from last cycle.  I'm not yet getting into what help these Democrats did or did not give the party or individual candidates (one thing at a time).  This is simply the raw numbers, but certainly a few things will jump out.

Unopposed (or unfunded Republican) and Cash on Hand (12/31/06):

CA-05 Doris Matsui  $78,466
CA-07 George Miller  $176,990
CA-12 Tom Lantos  $1,367,651
CA-14 Anna Eshoo  $341,669
CA-16 Zoe Lofgren  $147,670
CA-17 Sam Farr  $112,511
CA-20 Jim Costa  $205,014
CA-28 Howard Berman  $407,149
CA-29 Adam Schiff  $1,376,605
CA-31 Xavier Becerra  $448,286
CA-32 Hilda Solis  $143,566
CA-33 Diane Watson  $2,488
CA-34 Lucille Roybal-Allard  $38,943
CA-35 Maxine Waters  $101,768
CA-37 Juanita Millender-McDonald  N/A

Total: $4,948,776

So obviously, not all of these people are being miserly.  Diane Watson, for example, isn't exactly going home to swim in money or anything.  There's no way of knowing whether any of these districts will face a serious challenge in 2008, but with the exception of Jim Costa in CA-20, all of these districts have a PVI of D+12 or more and thus aren't particularly vulnerable.  That means that the money is legitimately in play.  Some of these folks get it, some (Ahem Tom Lantos? Adam Schiff?) seem not to.

In addition to the above, there are several more California Democrats who faced only token opposition.  For our purposes here, I'm drawing a different (though still arbitrary) line at $25,000 in total money raised to establish "token" status.  Without a doubt, it's tough to run a serious campaign in this state with $26,000, but I think the bar is low enough so as to not be debatable.

Token Republican Opposition and Cash on Hand (12/31/06):

CA-06 Lynn Woolsey  $24,531
CA-10 Ellen Tauscher  $211,924
CA-30 Henry Waxman  $652,596
CA-36 Jane Harman  $225,448
CA-38 Grace Napolitano  $194,155
CA-43 Joe Baca  $7,044
CA-51 Bob Filner  $6,369

Total: $1,322,067

Again offered without comment on extenuating circumstances (particularly with respect to primary challenges).  Again, not everyone has a deathgrip on the cash here.  Woolsey, Baca and Filner are clearly spending what they've got.  It's important though that we make sure this commitment keeps up.  And again, there's no way of knowing this far out where we'll see a well-funded challenge, but Filner and Tauscher are the only ones on this list who represent districts with PVIs of single-digit Dem leanings, which means these folks for the most part don't need to be worried about a tough Republican challenge.  Henry Waxman for example, and God bless his legislative ass-kicking, really doesn't need that money to keep himself in office.  Spend it through the DCCC, spend it on local infrastructure, but don't just let it rot.

This cannot be a last-minute project like last year.  We have to work towards creating a culture of support for the party whenever possible.  And if we have representatives who don't feel that the country is better off with more Democrats in office, we need to know that sooner than later.  Last year, Marty Meehan (MA-05) sat on more than $5 million and then, when he wasn't going to be able to run for Senate, took the money and went home.  We won't miss him, but that money really might've helped, say, Larry Kissell or Charlie Brown.  This is what we're trying to avoid.

This is not meant to be a one-way street.  Those who are not in need should pay in as much as possible, and those who are in need should take out as much as needed.  But it only works when the caucus buys into the idea that the financial health of the party is more important than the financial health of the individual.  Working together will be much more effective over the long haul than working as individuals, and it's important to convey that message to our representatives.  So as you watch fundraising progress, and as you have opportunities to talk with your representatives, think about and ask about the degree to which they're supporting the party as opposed to their own bank accounts.  House Dems are kicking some serious ass so far in 2007, which is great.  Let's make sure that the DCCC gets the extra support from our Representatives that it deserves.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Important to note (8.00 / 1)
That what would be great for these candidates to really do isn't just give money to the DCCC. That's great, and Rep. Van Hollen is pretty good (way better than Rahm anyway), but there is also another way.

The candidates themselves could help build field organizations within their districts. Spend the money within their own campaigns, but instead of just using the money to build their own name ID, build it to increase Democratic presence. Hire a field coordinator.  Ahem...hire a campaign blogger. I hear you can get those people cheap. (umm...well, i'm cheap anyway). Use those resources to get people excited about the Democratic brand, get them re-registered as Dems rather than DTSers. And they should give to DCCC.

Also, for the candidates who aren't rolling in money, they could be doing fundraisers. I'm pretty sure Diane Watson could raise some nice bank for some Dem institutions (or um...the Calitics CaliPAC).

I think?


Absolutely Agree (0.00 / 0)
The most important thing is that this money be spent on something.  It can be the DCCC (unlimited transfers are allowed which makes it convenient), it can be direct contributions to other candidates, it can be supporting PACs, it can be on local infrastructure.  Building strong GOTV operations locally is a great way to build the party at the non-Congressional level by delivering people to the polls for local offices or in support of up-ticket items (isn't there some big national election next year?).

Many of these candidates have already done a great job guest-hosting fundraisers for other candidates, and it would be great to see more of that as well.  Tons of ways to get involved and build the strength of the party.  Let's just make sure this money does something other than collect dust.

And yes Brian, we all know you come cheap ;).


[ Parent ]
indeed, critical this year (8.00 / 1)
This is that once in a blue moon cycle where there is neither a gubernatorial nor senate race to fund field. It would be great to see members fund field themselves and invest in growing the Party.

As for Lantos, WTF? The guy isn't running for higher office (everyone knows he just wants a Dem to win the White House so he can be Ambassador to Hungary). He could (and maybe should) face a challenger from the left, but he'd be able to raise huge money for that and there really is no excuse for him squandering so much money.

Twitter: @BobBrigham


[ Parent ]
Maybe it's for his daughter? (8.00 / 1)
His daughter, Katrina Swett is running for Senate in New Hampshire.  She's of the Lieberman/Hillary wing of the party, and she appears to be no fan of bloggers.  Perhaps there are FEC tricks that I don't know about that'll let him dump that money on her campaign at some point and in some way? Dunno.  Maybe he's just more focused on the responsibilities of being Dracula.

[ Parent ]
he can't give it to her (0.00 / 0)
He can make a contribution and run I.E.'s, but he can't just give her the dough like he could with the DCCC.

Twitter: @BobBrigham

[ Parent ]
oh...ewww (0.00 / 0)
She is his daughter? Yuck...run Jean Shaheen, run!

I think?

[ Parent ]
yeah (0.00 / 0)
I want to see these guys maxing out to fellow Californians facing tough races and spread it around nationally.

Thanks for doing this research Lucas.  Great stuff!


[ Parent ]
Re: Baca spending what he's got (8.00 / 1)
Yeah, probably on things like his son's city council campaign (where he spent all day Tuesday hanging out at the one polling place, instead of being in D.C. doing his job) and keeping the machine rolling ;-). Gods willing, we'll have someone to give him a real primary challenge.

--
Any comments I make here are my own, and not necessarily those of any organizations I belong to, so anyone who wants to take it out on said organizations can bite me.

--All of my comments are mine, and not those of any organization I belong to unless clearly stated otherwise.


I hope we can get more context like this (0.00 / 0)
I certainly am not able to investigate how all of these people spend their time and money, so I hope that the community can provide this sort of info.

In my wildest dreams, I'd love for each one of these people to have their own lively tags keeping track of what they do and why.


[ Parent ]
contributions (8.00 / 1)
I know a great PAC that someof these candidates could unload their excess money to :)  (see signature)

I wonder... (0.00 / 0)
...how much of this money you refer to comes from big, bad oil & evil corporate america? 

Would you all be clamoring to get some of it or would your principle outweigh practicality?


Depends (0.00 / 0)
on the influence it buys or looks like it buys.

[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox