[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Steinberg's Prison Plan

by: Brian Leubitz

Fri Aug 30, 2013 at 09:54:52 AM PDT


PhotobucketPlan calls for settlement with prison plaintiffs, sentencing reform

by Brian Leubitz

As I mentioned yesterday, the prisons are a mess. However, things can get worse. My friend, and SF School Board member, Matt Haney co-authored an op-ed in the SF Chronicle with Van Jones about the governor's position on the issue:

Gov. Jerry Brown confirmed this week that he is pulling his prison policies out of a 1980s playbook. It is heartbreaking to watch our nation's most famous Democratic governor cling to outdated, lock 'em up notions that even conservatives are abandoning in droves. ...

Tuesday, he made his most shocking step yet by proposing to send inmates to for-profit prisons. This boondoggle will cost an additional $315 million and more than $1 billion over three years to house thousands of people in private prisons leased by the state. Even our most extreme, fear-mongering politicians of decades past would have been reluctant to put forward such a scheme.

Brown appears hell bent on being on the wrong side of history. Across the political spectrum, leaders are beginning to understand that we need to invest in rehabilitation, re-entry programs, and evidence-based alternatives, rather than continuing our failed policies of mass incarceration. (Matt Haney and Van Jones / SF Chronicle)

So, while the Governor is working hard to come to some sort of immediate solution, there is not much optimism for a progressive in the plan. Meanwhile, Sen. Steinberg has a plan, but it relies on one very crucial assumption: he can get the plaintiffs in the suit to settle and have the judges agree to a three year delay on implementation.  As I mentioned yesterday, it is a big risk and not entirely clear how the judges would rule even with a settlement.

But there is reason to believe that a settlement would be possible. And perhaps Gov. Brown is playing a game to force the plaintiffs hand in some really tricky three dimensional chess strategy. Brown's plan is pretty much everything the plaintiffs don't want. Under all this, they would like to see some sentencing and other reforms in the prison system. The governor's plan pretty much goes in the entirely opposite direction. It is also worthwhile to note that the ACLU crunched some numbers to show that the state could meet the court order only using the techniques Brown has previously supported.

Now here is where Steinberg comes in. If he can get the plaintiffs to settle, and the court agrees to a delay, perhaps we have created the real opportunity that we need to follow the lead of other states like Kansas (!) that have already done much to decrease the mass incarcerations that have been building in our country over the past fifty years. In fact, the ACLU has a very interesting report on the subject. While three years may not be the time frame everybody would ideally target, it is realistic. And maybe Steinberg's plan is a good start on how we get there.

Now, as for that plan, you can see an outline here or over the flip. It is far from perfect. It calls for an advisory commission to review our public safety system, but doesn't really provide the specifics of how we really get to the important reductions we need in our prison system. However, maybe that lack of specificity is for the best now. Maybe it could set up the conditions of real reform that we need. But if we don't meet that court order, we'll be back to square one in three years. And maybe those three years could make a big difference.

Brian Leubitz :: Steinberg's Prison Plan

Durable Solutions - Senate Democratic Caucus - Aug2813

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Uhhh ... (0.00 / 0)

'... more than $1 billion over three years to house thousands of people in private prisons...'

Brown doesn't want to house 'thousands of people' .....

Technically, he wants to house
'thousands of CONVICTED CRIMINALS'

Do you see the slight difference there ?
WHAT is the point of all these expensive trials...
If we're just gonna let the crooks go ?
Why don't we abandon the '1980s playbook' and just let people rob and steal and shoplift and molest children?
Wouldn't That be more 'Enlightened' ??

I think Joseph Naso was just convicted of the murder of 4 women
He kept getting out of prison after his prior convictions because judges didn't 'cling to outdated, lock 'em up notions/  ofthe past


And yet... (5.00 / 1)
Other countries house far fewer prisoners, and have much safer countries. Prisons in the abstract don't make us safer, they only make us feel safer. We can do far more to actually reduce crime by focusing on rehabilitation, rather than merely warehousing people.

I think?

[ Parent ]
True (0.00 / 0)
It is true that other countries do have fewer prisoners

But, we have MUCH higher crime rates than any other Western nation

We have much higher Homocide rates than any other Western nation

We have a much higher prevalance of violence than any other Western nation

Hence, higher incarceration rates

And, it really is dishonest to not acknowledge that those locked in California prisoners are convicted criminals


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox