[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Revised Budget is Bad, Just Not as Bad as Originally Thought

by: Brian Leubitz

Tue Dec 13, 2011 at 18:39:33 PM PST


Brown's revised budget decreases hit to K-12

by Brian Leubitz

Another round of cuts is hardly worth celebrating, but Brown seems to have at least saved the 175 day school year.

K-12 school districts were at risk of losing as much $1.5 billion - the equivalent of seven instructional days - under the budget Brown and lawmakers enacted earlier this year. But they will face a smaller $79.6 million reduction in general funding. That should avert massive reductions in the school calendar or other drastic measures for most districts.

"It turns out the cuts are far less than they would have been," Brown said.

Districts will still face a $248 million elimination of school bus funding, however. Jill Wynns, president of the California School Boards Association, said districts will cut somewhere other than buses because they are mandated by federal law to provide transportation for students with disabilities.(SacBee)

Also getting big cuts? Higher education. UC, CSU, and the community college system all lose $100 million.  Community College Chancellor Jack Scott has indicated that will mean a $10/unit fee increase for community colleges, and UC and CSU will likely see another round of fee hikes.

You can check out a more exhaustive list of the cuts here.  

Brian Leubitz :: Revised Budget is Bad, Just Not as Bad as Originally Thought
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Sorry (0.00 / 0)
Sorry, but it's time to shift some blame to the Democratic Party
They can't find ANYTHING to CUT besides Education ?
Nothing ?

There's NO FAT in the Budget ??
It's time for Democrats to cut back on their own perks
There HAS to Be FAT that can be cut

That's why I oppose HSR
It's something 'Nice to Have', but not really 'Essential'
Yes, HSR is not part of the current budget
But, it should be cut

You might want ot look at the court System and those attorney fees and Judges salaries and administrative costs

Staffing for Legislators is another area for possible cuts


Your cuts amount to um, well, nothing (0.00 / 0)
The courts were already slashed. San Francisco lost several courtrooms. Attorneys fees aren't paid by the state, they are paid by parties.

The entire legislative budget is less than $150 million.

So...anything else?

I think?


[ Parent ]
Carole Migden ? (0.00 / 0)
Is Carole Migden still getting a state salary ?

The disgraced San Francisco Senator was voted out of office by her constituents (myself included)
She promptly got an appointment to a state commission
(and kept feeding at the state trough)

Many ex-Legislators get these well-paid sinecures
If the Legislature is serious, they could end these giveaways

C'mon Brian
You know full well there's fat in the budget
Get rid of it and apply those funds to worthy causes


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox