[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Alarcon enters the L.A. City Council District 7 Special Election

by: Leighton Woodhouse

Wed Nov 22, 2006 at 10:52:39 AM PST


Senator Richard Alarcon, who just won the 39th Assembly seat without contest two weeks ago, has made official his entry into the fight to represent L.A.'s District 7 in next year's special election.  Alarcon will be duking it out with Felipe Fuentes and, presumably, Cindy Montanez (who has announced but not yet filed).

Let's review the drama.

Leighton Woodhouse :: Alarcon enters the L.A. City Council District 7 Special Election
Once upon a time in the nineties, both Cindy Montanez and Alex Padilla enjoyed the mentorship of Richard Alarcon, a political fixture of the Northeast San Fernando Valley.

That was before Alarcon encouraged his wife to run against Padilla for the City Council seat Alarcon had vacated in order to move on to the Senate.  Padilla, who had managed the '98 campaign that had delivered Alarcon his new Senate seat, was, understandably, peeved.

Padilla went on to win his City Council seat, and Alarcon went on to enjoy his two terms in the Senate.  Montanez, meanwhile, represented much of the same Northeast Valley constituency as Padilla and Alarcon in her role as Assemblymember for the 39th district.

Things looked cozy in the San Fernando Valley for a time, but term limits have a way of turning even the most carefully crafted political detente upside down.

Alarcon and Montanez made a pact to trade seats in 2006, when both would be termed out of their respective legislative chambers.  Logical enough, but what then of Alex Padilla?  With Villaraigosa -- not exactly a chum of Padilla's -- running the city, marinating in City Council for the indefinite future was an unlikely prospect for a rising star like Alex.

Padilla disrupted the Alarcon-Montanez arrangement, by running for Alarcon's soon-to-be-vacated Senate seat.  Then he disrupted it further, by winning.

On the evening of the June primary election when she conceded her defeat, Montanez, suddenly faced with a dearth of elective options, announced her intention to run for Padilla's vacated Council seat.

Circumstances might have settled nicely at this point, with Padilla in the Senate, Alarcon in the Assembly, and Montanez a shoo-in for the Council, and with term limits in Sacramento years away.  But after such a nasty primary tangle for SD20, there was absolutely no love any longer lost between Padilla and Montanez, and Padilla was not about to stay neutral in any contest to succeed him.  Padilla's Chief of Staff in the Council, Felipe Fuentes, filed papers for the upcoming special election.  The race was looking to be a match-up of Fuentes versus Montanez for the City Council seat vacated by Padilla and once occupied by Richard Alarcon.

But that wasn't quite interesting enough.  Speculation abounded that Alarcon was not exactly satisfied with his fate for the next six years in the Assembly, and that his eyes were wandering in the direction of City Hall.  The question of what is so much more appealing about representing Council District 7, a seat Alarcon had already occupied in the '90s, than Assembly District 39, will make for good political chatterboxing.  Regardless of his motivations, it's now official: City Council District 7 will be the next clusterfucked battlefront in a long-standing and ever-more-complex squabble in the Valley among like-minded Democrats who once wore the same stripes.

And now there's a brand new tidbit for political speculation: with the possibility of Alarcon going back to City Council, who's starting to size up AD39?

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Ah, the term limits merry go round (0.00 / 0)
Don't you just wish either we could get off this ride, or some of them would just find another line of work instead of hopping around?

I think?

I don't get it (0.00 / 0)
He just got elected to the Assembly, which assures him 6 years of job security. Why would he run for L.A. City Council after just one year?

Term Limits musical chairs (0.00 / 0)
  A merry-go-round sounds like it would have room for everyone, while musical chairs always has someone stuck without a chair.
  Alarcon wants the city council seat because he could spend  as much time there as in the Assembly (thanks to Measure R, which extended L.A. city council limits from two to three terms), while getting paid better and having an easier commute. Also an L.A. city council seat is a higher profile position than Assemblymember, which is in far-off Sacramento, ignored mostly by L.A. local media.
  I am concerned about the costs of a special election for the Assembly seat if Alarcon wins, and the 39th being vacant during the process. For that reason alone, if I lived in the district I would not vote for Richard for council. If he did win it, figure that Felipe and Cindy (if she has any term eligibility left) would run for the Assembly. The only good thing about it is that the Northeast SFV is too Democratic for a GOPer to win the Assembly seat. What a waste!

Also a better pension at City Council, I understand. (0.00 / 0)
...not to suggest that that was a factor in Alarcon's decision.

Another consideration may have been the appearance of Kevin de Leon as a freshly-minted Assemblymember and childhood friend of Fabian.  I imagine there are many who aspire for the Speakership who may be feeling themselves a little crowded by de Leon's presence in the chamber.

By the way, Montanez is termed out in the Assembly.  She won't be able to run for that seat if it comes open again by an Alarcon victory in the 7th.


[ Parent ]
Montanez (0.00 / 0)
  Thanks, Woodhouse.  I couldn't remember if she was first elected in 2000 or 2002. The Assembly term limits are so short! I voted Yes on R because a twelve year limit for council seems to be fairer than eight years. It means that I will likely be stuck with my same councilmember (Jack Weiss) for another four years. Oh well...

[ Parent ]
Montanez (0.00 / 0)
Correction:  Montanez WAS NOT TERMED OUT.  She was elected in the Nov 2002 election, sworn in Dec 2002 took office Jan 2003.  Her first term was Jan 2003-Dec 2004.  Her 2nd term is just finishing Jan 2005 - Dec 2006.  If she and Alarcon had not cut the deal (Alarcon had nowhere to go before Measure R) she could have ran unapposed and maintained her AD 39 seat for one more term.  (Assembly term limits = three, two year terms)

Now our area is left without a representative in the assembly at a critical time when this area desperately needs funding from both the Transportation and Education bonds.

In a recent LA Daily News article, Alarcon was quoted as saying that he would like to solve the issue of poverty in this area.  A difficult task since he's decided not to serve out even one of his terms in the assembly. The area won't be able to get its fair share of voter approved bond $ (overwhelmingly approved by this area) which would in turn generate employment and investment into education - the two most critical factors in solving poverty.  Both no longer a possibility for the northeast valley.  Alarcon's true reason for abandoning this area is to solidify a much needed pension. I guess I can understand his strategy for someone his age who has accomplished virtually nothing...by the way he's had the past 8 years in the legistlature to work on  his much "touted and incomplete master plan" to solve poverty.  He was unable to complete it, he never forged  the relationships necessary in the Senate leadership and if his track record is indication of what he will do in the  CD 7 voters should be wary of him and cast a vote for Montanez.  She has the proven track record both from San Fernando when she was mayor and she changed the entire city around.  It is  the jewel of the northeast valley.  It is the most studied Latino majority city (ULI is doing an expose on its success) and she was part of the leadership in the Assembly holding  the most desired position as Chair of the Rules committee.  She has proven her success....She even took on the automotive industry and won!  The car buyer's bill of rights call the DMV they refer to it on their answering servic.

 


Montanez (0.00 / 0)
Correction:  Montanez WAS NOT TERMED OUT.  She was elected in the Nov 2002 election, sworn in Dec 2002 took office Jan 2003.  Her first term was Jan 2003-Dec 2004.  Her 2nd term is just finishing Jan 2005 - Dec 2006.  If she and Alarcon had not cut the deal (Alarcon had nowhere to go before Measure R) she could have ran unapposed and maintained her AD 39 seat for one more term.  (Assembly term limits = three, two year terms)

Now our area is left without a representative in the assembly at a critical time when this area desperately needs funding from both the Transportation and Education bonds.

In a recent LA Daily News article, Alarcon was quoted as saying that he would like to solve the issue of poverty in this area.  A difficult task since he's decided not to serve out even one of his terms in the assembly. The area won't be able to get its fair share of voter approved bond $ (overwhelmingly approved by this area) which would in turn generate employment and investment into education - the two most critical factors in solving poverty.  Both no longer a possibility for the northeast valley.  Alarcon's true reason for abandoning this area is to solidify a much needed pension. I guess I can understand his strategy for someone his age who has accomplished virtually nothing...by the way he's had the past 8 years in the legistlature to work on  his much "touted and incomplete master plan" to solve poverty.  He was unable to complete it, he never forged  the relationships necessary in the Senate leadership and if his track record is indication of what he will do in the  CD 7 voters should be wary of him and cast a vote for Montanez.  She has the proven track record both from San Fernando when she was mayor and she changed the entire city around.  It is  the jewel of the northeast valley.  It is the most studied Latino majority city (ULI is doing an expose on its success) and she was part of the leadership in the Assembly holding  the most desired position as Chair of the Rules committee.  She has proven her success....She even took on the automotive industry and won!  The car buyer's bill of rights call the DMV they refer to it on their answering servic.


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox