[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

San Francisco's Evening That Brought Back Donkey Kong

by: Brian Leubitz

Wed Jan 05, 2011 at 10:20:45 AM PST


We are about to witness the biggest fumble in the history of progressive politics in San Francisco and the blame rests squarely on the shoulders of David Chiu. I will haunt you. I will politically haunt you for the biggest fumble in history. It's on, like Donkey Kong."
- Supervisor Chris Daly, January 4, 2011 (Beyond Chron)

And thus the phrase "It's on like Donkey Kong" entered the San Francisco political lexicon.  The whole story is somewhat (well, vastly) more complex.  But let me outline what I've learned while being away, and the timeline as I see it. KQED and the SF Appeal have good wrap-ups.

1) The current Board, which leaves office on Saturday, tried to pass a declaration that the Mayor has left his job already, that he should have been inaugurated, and the procedure of a technical inauguration doesn't matter.  They then pushed for the Sheriff Mike Henessey, who is pretty universally respected.  However, being that this process is more about personal power politics than respect, things didn't go so smoothly.  Henessey was only able to get 5 votes, rather than the required 6.  

2) Bevan Dufty and Sophie Maxwell went to a closed-door meeting with Newsom, and thereby reversed their previous votes against City Administrator Ed Lee, and suddenly, the little known Lee had 7 votes.  This includes the support of Eric Mar, one of the core bloc of progressive votes on the Board.

3) The Board was recessed after several Supervisors objected to the fact that they had neither spoken to Lee nor had the opportunity to talk to him, as he is currently in Hong Kong.

4) When the Board came back, that's when we get Daly's above quote about haunting Board President David Chiu's career. The episode, along with the fact that Lee is out of the country, were enough to get the vote delayed until Friday.

5) Oh, and as an added bonus, the incoming Board can change the interim Mayor at their discretion, so it is all seems a bit temporary.

It seems clear that Lee is willing to take the job, as long as he can get his old job back once the new Mayor is elected in November. A deal seems to be in place to retain most of Newsom's staff in a possible Lee administration.  Lee's connections to Rose Pak (a Chinatown powerbroker) seem to tilt the balance of power in his direction, with her ties to both David Chiu and incoming D6 supervisor Jane Kim.  The rumored other leg of this deal is the possible appointment of Chiu to the now vacant District Attorney's post that AG Kamala Harris recently left.

This works on many levels for Newsom. First, it gets a relative moderate to keep the seat warm until November, which was really Newsom's main goal.  But as an added bonus, Ed Lee becomes the first Asian-American Mayor of San Francisco, and takes that potential honor away from Sen. Leland Yee.

But, being that Maxwell joined the 5 member progressive core to stall the vote until Friday, there is a lot of wiggle room here.  The SFBG's Tim Redmond sees the big problem with Lee being that we just don't really know where he stands. Perhaps more information about that comes out today and tomorrow in time for the Friday vote, or perhaps this is all pushed to the new Board. Either way, this just seems to be San Francisco political theater taken to a new level.

Brian Leubitz :: San Francisco's Evening That Brought Back Donkey Kong
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

just a few things (4.00 / 1)
1) The Board never tried to pass a declaration that the office is vacant. This was all about who the interim mayor would be if there was a vacancy, but they didn't follow by voting to declare a vacancy as there was too much bad blood with how the vote was orchestrated.

2) Not exactly, Maxwell added her vote to Lee in Round II, bringing him to five votes. Then there was the first recess, when Bevan went into Kava's office and flipped to Lee. Then Mar said he'd also move to Lee, meaning there would have been 7 votes had the vote gone through, with Chiu & Mar abandoning progressives.

The whole thing was simply a disaster, from the moment Newsom threw his tantrum and refused to be sworn in as Lt. Governor (Maldonado gets to stay put through all this and if something happens to Brown, he is Governor and gets to pick a new Lt of his choosing).

Daly was right, Chiu simply blew it. As for Dufty, hopefully Newsom promised him something good as his mayoral campaign was a joke even before he torched all his bridges to the left.

The good news is this will take some identity politics out of this fall's mayor's race. Also, this vote demonstrated on how pretty much everyone in SF wants to keep Leland Yee from buying Room 200.

The bad news, by continuing until Friday, there will be one more meeting with the current board. Which means one more meeting when San Francisco is embarrassed by having Michela Alioto-Pier play her part as the dumbest elected official in the state of California.

Twitter: @BobBrigham


Nonsense (0.00 / 0)

the Solution:

SF elections Should be held in even numbered years and aligned with State and Federal elections
It would also prevent these comic opera fiascos
No over in terms

That would save the cost elections in odd numbered years

Newsom left for carreer advancement, good riddance

Let THE VOTERS DECIDE
NOT the Pols


And that would solve the current situation how? (0.00 / 0)
Look, you'll always need some kind of succession process for any elected executive.  SF's process sounds like it's totally screwed up, but just shouting "EVEN YEAR ELECTIONS" won't make any difference.  

Besides, in the last 30 years, exactly one SF mayor has left office because they were elected to some other office, and not because they lost, were termed out, or stepped down.  That mayor is Gavin Newsom.

You might want SF to move to 2 year election cycles to match everyone else for other reasons, and those would be legitimate, but to solve the political infighting problem around an unclear succession process, which has only come up once in 30 years?  Not a good reason.  


[ Parent ]
Elections (0.00 / 0)
It ALSO SAVES MONEY
We kinda have a deficit in SF

We would have elections every two years, not every year
Turn out is lower in odd year elections
and, YES there will be no overlap in office holder terms between city to state

What's the argument for NOT having city elections aligned with the state and Federal calendar ?


[ Parent ]
Look, I'm not saying it's a bad idea (0.00 / 0)
just that this fiasco around Newsom is not a reason to argue for it -- it actually hurts your point.  It would be the same if he'd resigned, or fallen ill, or any of a number of things that happen from time to time.

[ Parent ]
this was one benefit to electing newsom lt. gov (4.00 / 1)
free entertainment!

This is really confusing (0.00 / 0)
What, in short, was the end result of all this? "SF doesn't have a mayor yet"?

SF may or may not have a mayor (4.00 / 1)
Pretty much everyone seems to agree there's something odd about SF voting for Newsom to be Lt. Governor, but him trying to refuse to take office and letting the GOP control a seat they lost.

As was mentioned in the hearing, when Obama flubbed his oath and did a technical retake the next day, everyone reassured us that it was just a formality, that he really had been president as he was elected to a position and his term had already begun. Under this interpretation, Gavin is no longer mayor. Thus, Gavin could not appoint somebody as DA. This falls under the, "buy the ticket, take the ride" legal theory.

Newsom claims he can simply remain as mayor as long as he wants without serving as Lt. Governor. In which case he could appoint a new DA. Plus, the vote on Friday really doesn't matter as there won't be a vacancy to fill until the new board is sworn in Saturday.


Twitter: @BobBrigham


[ Parent ]
About "Obama's flub" (0.00 / 0)
Obama didn't flub his oath.  Chief Justice Roberts did.  He just couldn't suck it up and spit it out, this man with the steel-trap mind who was rumored to remember the details of every case he'd ever tried.

President Obama probably looked at the pile of crapola he was getting from the birthers and decided to redo the oath to head off another.


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox