[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

What Happens When SF's City Leaders Move to Sacramento?

by: Brian Leubitz

Fri Dec 10, 2010 at 14:30:00 PM PST


By now, you may have heard that much of San Francisco's political leadership is moving on up in about a month or so.  But just how San Francisco moves on from Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris  (note: I worked on her campaign, but I have no inside details on this) is still up in the air.  The Wall Street Journal has something of a primer on the issues. It's a decent enough start, portraying the various scenarios.  For a more entertaining take, watch the Necessary Conversation video on your right. But as somebody who is pretty involved in local politics, these are the decision points, as it were, that I see:

1) When will Gavin Newsom switch gigs?

Officially, Abel Maldonado's term ends on January 3, like all other statewide officers. And that is the date that Gavin Newsom is supposed to be sworn in as LG.  However, he is trying to push back that date a few days in order to get his replacement selected by the new Board of Supervisors that is sworn in on Jan 7.

Of course, if he is able to push back his inauguration date, the other thing that would bring him is the ability to appoint the interim DA.  He's hinted that he would respect the opinion of Kamala Harris on that pick, but would, if he makes that call, be the one with the final decision on DA.

At this point it isn't totally clear whether he will push the date back, but, legally it looks like he might be able to do it.  That has to give it a pretty good chance of happening, I'd say it's a 60% shot now.

2) Does anybody have 6 votes?

That is the big question, and right now, it seems that there are only a few people that could legitimately claim to have those votes. And one of them, Asm. Tom Ammiano, has said that he doesn't want the job.  Sup. Chris Daly seems intent on twisting Ammiano's arm into taking the gig.  State Sen. Mark Leno would probably have the votes as well, but as he was just appointed Senate Budget Chair, I'm not sure that he would want the gig either.  Sen. Leland Yee really, really wants the job, but doesn't have the 6 votes.  City Attorney Dennis Herrera and Assessor Phil Ting are also running for mayor, but don't appear to have the 6 votes necessary

Now, if nobody is able to get to 6 votes, the Board President automatically becomes acting mayor. Right now that is Sup. David Chiu.  Chiu is also the favorite to retain that position on the new board, and would thus get the mayor's new gig.  Now, that wouldn't make him "interim" mayor, but just acting. The big difference is that the acting mayor can be replaced by the board, whereas the interim mayor cannot. Chiu is also rumored to be considering a full run at the Mayor's office if he is named to be interim Mayor.  And, running as something of an incumbent, he would at least be in a much stronger position than he is for that right now.

Oh, and just to make things more complicated, there have also been rumors that Chiu is interested in the DA position as well.

3) A care taker?

If the progressive bloc can't get something together to choose an interim mayor, Sheriff Mike Henessey and SFPUC General Manager Ed Harrington are rumored "caretaker" Mayors.  The election is just 11 months away, so a caretaker mayor would allow the voters to actually choose the next Mayor.

There are really too many variables to consider, but hopefully this flood of information will somewhat valuable as we watch to see the dominoes fall in San Francisco.

Brian Leubitz :: What Happens When SF's City Leaders Move to Sacramento?
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Another option (0.00 / 0)
If Kamala Harris resigned from her position prior to January 3, couldn't Newsome appoint the interim DA prior to that?

Why all Bay Area folks? (5.00 / 1)
Why is all the leadership of our state from the Bay Area? It's not as if there were no Democrats south of the Tehachapis! Or is it too many "East LA Democrats" economically rather liberal but socially rather conservative?  

^^^ This (0.00 / 0)
I also hate that the Bay Area always has to overshadow us SoCal folks, we have the greater population!. Acknowledge that we have L.A County which has over 10 million residents. Actually most if not all of the Hispanic L.A Dems are Liberal on both issues (State Sen. Padilla is a strong LGBT supporter from North-central LA) , but the Hispanic L.A Dem VOTERS are another story...

I'm glad we have some clout in Sacramento (Chiang as Controller and Bowen as SoS, but its frustrating that all we get are San francisco politicians, when there's a whole crop of us down here being neglected as usual)


[ Parent ]
only 3 pols are from SF (0.00 / 0)
diane feinstein, gavin newsom, kamala harris. bill lockyer and jerry brown are from oakland, boxer's from marin (but lives in LA), and dave jones is from sac. sure, thats a lot of nor cal, but it's fairly spread out internally within that.

[ Parent ]
Boxer lives in Riverside County, not L.A. (4.50 / 2)
   She is now in the Palm Springs area which is in SoCal but definitely not Los Angeles. I think the bigger concern is that there are no Latinos (whether from L.A. or elsewhere) in statewide office.

[ Parent ]
sorry, nor cal tic there (0.00 / 0)
"LA" = everything south of the grapevine. i stand corrected.

[ Parent ]
Speaker of the Assembly? (4.00 / 1)
Antonio Villaraigosa, Fabian Núñez, Karen Bass, John A. Pérez - all from LA, three of which were from the East LA area (and aren't socially conservative at all; that's a myth about California Latinos).

One might say they didn't win a statewide election, which is true, but as Speaker they were more powerful than most who did.

Bass preferred to run for Congress and Núñez had family problems that distracted him from a likely 2010 statewide run. But I would fully expect Pérez to make a run for something statewide in 2014. Or they could follow Villaraigosa and run for mayor.

One possible reason why NorCal has done better statewide is less competition. SoCal has a lot of different Dem factions; NorCal doesn't. Easier for a NorCal candidate to run with the support of the Bay Area, whereas SoCal tends to split it's votes - see the AG primary for a good example of this. Meanwhile there's nice positions of power in SoCal, like mayor of LA or county Board of Supervisors, to take that don't require going to Sacramento.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
And Torlakson (0.00 / 0)
Tom Torlakson, our incoming Superintendent of Public Schools, is from Antioch (in the SF East Bay area).

[ Parent ]
What does that mean, "neglected"? (3.50 / 2)
There was a primary election, then a general election.  If viable SoCal candidates had run and had presented the better statewide option, they would have won.  

It's not like there's a secret group of people making sure that SoCal doesn't get representation in the executive branch.


[ Parent ]
Yep. (0.00 / 0)
As "Democratic" as we are, Prop. 8 passed in Los Angeles County.  Barely, but it passed.

[ Parent ]
not all bay area (0.00 / 0)
dave jones is from sacramento, and deb bowen and john chiang are from LA. and boxer lives in LA these days, although her political roots are in marin.

mostly, the big guns in socal decided not to run this time around, most prominently villaraigosa, whom a bunch of people thought would run for gov this time around. janice hahn, rocky delgadillo, al torrico, pedro nava, hector de la torre, none of them are real powerhouses, and in the AG race they all split the regional vote to boot.

it's worth remembering that the speaker of the assembly is a los angeleno, john perez. as have been the last 6 speakers of the assembly.


[ Parent ]
Leland Yee (0.00 / 0)
I would love to see Leland Yee get the gig if he really wants it.  Why can't he get the 6 votes?  He's the most wellknown of the lot for outsiders down here in L.A.

Sen. Yee is running for mayor (0.00 / 0)
Sen. Yee is running for mayor, so it would be an enormous task for him to get the 6 votes. There is something of rivalry between him and David Chiu, and he doesn't neatly fall into one or other of the factions.

Also, there are a bunch of issues that make voting for him controversial. See the transgender health benefits vote.

I think?


[ Parent ]
One-year interim mayor is best choice --- Art Agnos (0.00 / 0)
The Bd. of Sups should appoint an experienced one-year interim mayor--not someome who intends on running for mayor next November.  

The best choice would be former Mayor Art Agnos.  He's experienced in dealing with difficult budget challenges, knows how things work in City Hall, and gets along pretty well with most Supervisors--whether it's the existing (out-going) board, or the new, in-coming board.  Art has progressive values without having a reputation of being fringe left.  

IF the board appointed someone who intends to run for Mayor next year, that person would likely lose.  The voters would resent the board telling them who should be mayor, and the economy won't have picked up enough for the new mayor to have gained political advantage from improvements in the economic situation.  


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox