[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Election Day 2010

by: Robert Cruickshank

Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:30:00 AM PDT


Well, here we go - the November 2010 election is finally here. Finally our TV screens will be freed from the tyranny of Meg Whitman's mug for the first time since the Winter Olympics. (Although I've started seeing Lindsey Vonn in TV ads, which is nice.) Californians will awaken tomorrow with a new governor-elect, although the word "new" should probably not be taken literally in Jerry Brown's case.

But tonight will offer some fascinating, compelling, and sometimes gut-wrenching election returns, not just across the country but here in California. Here's what we at Calitics will be watching for tonight:

How big will our Democratic wave be? California is bucking the national trend - fueled by a diverse electorate, a maturing progressive movement, and strong campaigns, Democrats are poised to do well at the top of the ticket. But how deep will that wave go? Will it be enough to overcome corporate money downticket to put Kamala Harris and Dave Jones into office? Will it be enough to save some of the close seats in the House of Representatives? Will it be enough to pick off some Republican seats?

Can Dems play defense? Incumbent Democrats are generally going to cruise tonight, but in a few districts things are much less certain. In the House, Jerry McNerney (CA-11), Jim Costa (CA-20) and Loretta Sanchez (CA-47) are facing strong right-wing challenges, with Dennis Cardoza (CA-18) vulnerable as well. If people voting for Brown and Boxer stick around and vote downticket for these Dems, they should be OK, but any one of them could lose tonight. In the Legislature, Dems are nervous but confident they can keep their Assembly seats, with Alyson Huber (AD-10) and Joan Buchanan (AD-15) being the most vulnerable.

Can Dems play offense? If there's a blue wave tonight, we'll know it by how many - if any - new seats Democrats pick up. The most important battle is in SD-12, where Anna Caballero is fighting a brutal battle against Anthony Cannella. Caballero will do extremely well in the Salinas Valley portion of the district, but it's much less clear how she'll do in the Central Valley, where the race will be decided.

Dems may also have some pickups in the Assembly. Richard Pan in AD-5 is in a tight battle with arch-bigot Andy Pugno, author of Prop 8. Melissa Fox in AD-70 and Phu Nguyen in AD-68 could be Democratic pickups in Orange County.

If tonight is a good night for Dems, we could see some Republican House seats fall. Ami Bera in CA-3 probably has the best chance, but any one of Bill Hedrick (CA-44), Steve Pougnet (CA-45), and Beth Krom (CA-48) has a chance to surprise.

Will corporate money pick off a few statewide seats after all? Karl Rove and big corporations are spending millions to defeat Kamala Harris and Dave Jones - these races really matter, and even though corporate money might flame out in the higher profile races, we've got to hope that it fails to cost us the Attorney General and Insurance Commissioner seats.

Will we sweep the propositions? Ballot propositions have a tendency to not turn out the way progressives like, although that has begun to change ever since the historic victory over Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2005. Tonight could see a progressive sweep, especially if the defeat of Prop 23 and the passage of Prop 25 are joined by the defeat of Prop 26 and the passage of Prop 24. We also need Prop 21 to pass and, last but not least, I really hope Prop 19 pulls out the victory and sets California - and eventually the nation - on the path away from Prohibition.

Will Nancy Pelosi remain speaker? As I explained over the weekend, losing her as Speaker would be catastrophic. I'm pretty confident about most things here in California today, but not this. Republican control of the House would inaugurate a new round of Hooverism and could even undermine what remains of our democracy. Speaker Pelosi has been a fighter for progressive causes and for California. If she loses her majority tonight, it will be terrible - especially since it won't be her fault, as she will have been undone by the failures of President Obama and the Senate Democrats.

We'll be covering the elections results here at Calitics and, at least for myself, on Twitter - follow me @cruickshank. Get out there and vote, and then come back here and talk about the results!

Robert Cruickshank :: Election Day 2010
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Election Day 2010 | 22 comments
I'm voting the party line (8.00 / 1)
That is according to Calitics ...

in the CA 36th House of Reps though I can't stomach warmonger/Mossad floozy Harman, so I'm writing in Ralph Nader!

So glad to live in Cali! Let's save our state today!


Oh, how I badly want to go home! :'( (0.00 / 0)
Especially after Perry won here in the Christian Republic of Texas.

My blog


Twitter


[ Parent ]
Keep California Blue (3.00 / 1)
If our democracy depends on whether or not we have a democratic majority or a republican majority, then is it really much of a democracy?

It's a rhetorical question... (0.00 / 0)
...that has no easy answer. But I would say "Of course not."

Unfortunately, ceding the state to barbarians by not voting party line, although perhaps a more pure democratic vocalization, can not be a solution.

Harman, though, will never receive my vote. Too bad there are no third party candidates in CA 36.  


[ Parent ]
About those Court of Appeal judges... (5.00 / 1)
since the local and state parties seem to have only endorsed a few, and left the rest blank, I was able to find this guide from the Westside Republicans on who the GOP recommends.  Good information there on the judges' political affiliation, as well as who first appointed them.

So basically, just go with the opposite of what they say.  :-)


Voting question... (0.00 / 0)
I went to vote and noticed prayers on the wall, 'united we stand' 9/11 photos and a lot of other photos that I would prefer not to see when I go vote. Does anyone know the rules regarding this type of thing?  

There are rules against electioneering... (3.00 / 1)
But it's awfully hard to make a clear-cut case that anything that isn't overtly supportive of a particular candidate or party constitutes such.

[ Parent ]
Thanks (0.00 / 0)
Yeah, that's what I thought. The first thing I thought when I walked in was Tea Party. Looks like they walked that fine line with precision.  

[ Parent ]
9/11 = "Tea Party" (3.00 / 1)
How is this connection made?

[ Parent ]
fetishization of that national tragedy (0.00 / 0)
and obsession with concommittent war of civilizations against islam is a hallmark of many teabagger types.  

[ Parent ]
Locally, many polling places (0.00 / 0)
are car dealerships.

I think that's a stroke of genius on the part of the car dealerships. :-)

Fry, don't be a hero! It's not covered by our health plan!


[ Parent ]
I wonder how many of them do their own line-walking when it comes to electioneering? (0.00 / 0)
"YOU can walk out of here in a brand new BMW for less than you think (but $18 more than you think if prop 21 passes)".

[ Parent ]
I suspect they're just grateful for the company (4.00 / 1)
No BMW dealerships in this neck of the woods!

Fry, don't be a hero! It's not covered by our health plan!

[ Parent ]
Pelosi a fighter for progressive causes? Not her fault? (1.00 / 1)
Seriously? I visited your site because there is link at Courage Campaign. Disappointed that a site like this considers Pelosi a progressive. Unless of course illegal invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation is progressive. Or maybe the use of torture is progressive. No doubt the elimination of FISA is progressive.

Yeah sure, Nancy is real progressive. Obviously you are already celebrating a prop 19 victory.


So (0.00 / 0)
Cause Pelosi and all were doing their job that they were elected to do based on what evidence that they had at the time which turned out to be false later on, You want to kick them out and let a republican in? or do nothing out of what spite or vindictiveness, Cause It isn't something You wanted or wished for? Could You have done any better with what they knew and only what they knew back then? I doubt It. Being Vindictive or Spiteful is wrong, I'd rather forgive them, they made the best decision that they could then based on what they knew and that's to protect fools like You who think that doing nothing is the best defense, Mr. T I think said It best, I pity the fool.

[ Parent ]
voted yes on 19 this AM (5.00 / 1)
I forgot to take the courage campaign recommendations with me, so I actually had to read the ballots in full myself (I was only familiar with prop 23 and 25, not the rest, so I had to learn).

I also wondered: what is the process by which you can get your endorsements put into the voter guide? and is it fair? i see california league of women voters, sierra club, and a LOT of howard jarvis taxpayers assc endorsements. do the Yes and No campaigns get to say which endorsements that they want in the voter guide packet?


Get over the Pelosi thing (0.00 / 0)
I told you, she's been just as complicit in watering down legislation as Reid. Plus, she had twice as long as Obama to get things done, and, instead, she let Bush destroy the country even more. So good riddance, as far as I'm concerned. Oh, and why would I continue to endorse a candidate who was aware of, and approved, torture?  

One person (0.00 / 0)
Is not enough when out numbered. Where is Your evidence?

[ Parent ]
walked by the neighborhood voting precinct (4.00 / 1)
by all accounts there has been big turnout, at least in my neighborhood. looks like the students are turning out, which bodes well for CA.

Ive give up on National Policy (5.17 / 6)
 You all should too...

We are the 8th largest economy in the World, we should be aiming for number 7. The Nation is lost for two years, let's just get what we need to do done HERE.

We can export our Tea Party morons to other states with higher taxes on those that deserve it, making sure rights are equalized for LBGT and Minorities.

The LEFT COAST needs to remain STRONG and PROGRESSIVE.

We can do thi ON OUR OWN, we have the TECH SECTOR on LOCK, we can build anything we want, we have talented people here.

Let's just focus on CALIFORNIA!


That's what I'm doing. (0.00 / 0)
Because I plan to come home soon after I escape Texas.

My blog


Twitter


[ Parent ]
Polls are now closed. (0.00 / 0)
Crossing my fingers that California beats Texas again...

My blog


Twitter


Election Day 2010 | 22 comments
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox