[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Once Again, Californians Vote For Tax Increases

by: Robert Cruickshank

Thu Jun 10, 2010 at 11:30:00 AM PDT


In what is becoming a very enjoyable ritual after every election, Calitics is once again mythbusting the notion that Californians somehow dislike taxes. The evidence yet again proves that voters will indeed approve tax increases.

California City Finance reported on the numbers yesterday. They found that 73% of the local tax and bond measures on the June 8 ballot passed - 44 out of 60. Here's the breakdown:

Type Total Pass Passing %
City Majority Vote 11 9 82
County Majority Vote 2 2 100
City 2/3 Vote 8 5 63
County 2/3 Vote 1 1 100
Special District (2/3) 9 6 67
School Parcel Tax (2/3) 9 6 67
School bond (55%) 20 15 75

The report also notes that 65% of majority vote local taxes have been approved since 2001.

The passage rate would have been higher if California had real democracy instead of rigging elections so that a small minority can block these tax increases. Of the three school parcel taxes that "failed," only one actually failed to get a 50%+1 majority, and that was in the Cutler-Orosi Joint USD in Tulare/Fresno counties.

June 2010 results prove yet again that Californians will vote for tax increases. They won't approve every one, but they will approve most of them. The myth, lacking in evidence, that California voters are anti-tax has once again been exposed as a lie.

Robert Cruickshank :: Once Again, Californians Vote For Tax Increases
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Palin @ CSU Stanislaus (0.00 / 0)
police trained in hardcore anti-protest techniques for Palin CSUS appearance.

http://palingates.blogspot.com... it.html


Fair enough. But the interesting question is "Why?" (0.00 / 0)
The facts presented do indeed indicate that Californians will vote for tax increases.  44 out of 60 is a strong pro-tax result.  I would argue that the reason for these types of successes is because voters can draw a clear linkage between the tax and some tangible benefit from that extra revenue.

At the statewide level, I would theorize that voters will oppose new taxes (such as higher income, sales, and car registration tax) because they are folded into the state's general revenue pile and allow the state legislature to direct the use of such funds.  Because the legislature's approval rate is abysmal, and most voters are uncomfortable with the concept of that group directing the use of funds, such statewide taxes will be strongly opposed.

My solution would be to devolve as many services as possible from the state to the city and county level, where government can be held much more accountable and where big money (on both sides) has less of a sway.


Smaller Government (0.00 / 0)
though more expensive, is better.

And by smaller, we just mean mean local.


[ Parent ]
Then I guess TR is rolling in His grave (0.00 / 0)
Big Business likes the idea of smaller Government, Why? So It do what It wants and tell everyone, We'll do what We please, Don't like It? Next Goon squads and bombings of Newspapers/TV Stations. Government must be strong and effective, Just not over complicated, problem is Government is made by a committee who is made up of people from different areas and simple concise rules don't often get passed, As there are compromises made to get votes, some believe regs should be light, others heavy, some non existent or nearly so, So is It any wonder why the Legacy of Teddy(Theodore) Roosevelt is not a part of the Republican Party that He left? The Republican Party today likes Big Business and likes Wall Street and deregulation is the Republican way/mantra today, As profit is everything, Although It wasn't always this way, Some aren't really more than Libertarians in disguise(Glenn Beck at least says He's a Libertarian). Too many big mergers have happened, BP is a prime example, It should not be allowed to go Bankrupt or be Merged or be bought up by their rivals(Exxon/Mobil or Royal Dutch Shell), BP should be Broken up into smaller companies, As should Exxon/Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell.

[ Parent ]
that would be a great deal for wealthy counties (0.00 / 0)
and cities, but it would totally screw poorer ones that rely on state funding. hence the reason republicans love to call for "local control."

[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox