[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Marcy Winograd - The Real Progressive

by: Marcy Winograd 2010

Wed Jun 02, 2010 at 16:37:00 PM PDT


Marcy Winograd 2010 :: Marcy Winograd - The Real Progressive
Dear Friends and Volunteers,

Thank you for your enduring support and activism on behalf of a myriad of issues, many of which are at the core of my congressional campaign.  I'm talking about our work to transition from a permanent war economy to a new green economy, to protect the accuracy of our vote, to stop new offshore oil leases, and to advance prison reform.

Marta Evry is a blogger who, despite her good work on the California budget crisis, wants to re-elect my opponent, arguing that Jane Harman is a progressive.  With a flick of her wrist, Marta dismisses Harman's repeated votes for war and occupation, for an onerous bankruptcy bill, for a free trade agreement that lowers labor and environmental standards, for her reported collusion with AIPAC to advance her own career in exchange for a promise to subvert due process, for her vote against affordable breast cancer medication, and for her cover-up of the Bush administration's massive illegal wiretapping program.

The last time I checked the above credentials were not ones a progressive would trumpet.  For the record, Harman is a member of the corporate Democrats' Blue Dog coalition.

In terms of the attacks Marta has leveled against me, please know that 98% of the stocks in question were sold years ago, and today I do not own any of the stocks to which Marta raised objections.  My opponent, however, invests up to eight million dollars in weapons manufacturers, and has never once recused herself from war supplemental votes.  Nor did Harman recuse herself from the  overnight bank bailout vote, despite the fact that her most recent disclosure statement indicates she had up to 5-million invested in Goldman Sachs at the time of the bail-out.

My husband and I do have family investments in property in Santa Monica, approximately six blocks outside the district.  For the record, however, I do not live in Santa Monica.  My husband and I have lived in the 36th congressional district in Marina del Rey for nearly two years.  Prior to that, we lived in Pacific Palisades, in Congressman Waxman's district.

Unfortunately, a year ago Marta published on her blog misinformation, accusing me of not living in the district -- and refusing to correct her mistake when asked to clarify for the sake of her readers.

I'm sure Harman, with her net worth of 300-million plus, has plenty invested in real estate outside of the 36th congressional district.

Additionally, I am sorry Marta fails to value my work on behalf of our community, our state, our nation, and our world.  For the last 15 years I have worked either as a classroom teacher, school facilitator, or literacy coach, with four of  those years working at a variety of schools, from West LA to Wilmington, in our district to improve education.  I feel fortunate to have worked with many dedicated educators collaborating to embed research-based literacy strategies in every subject.  Most recently, I taught and coached at Crenshaw HS in South Los Angeles, where I worked to establish a Social Justice and the Law Academy.  South LA is a few miles from our district, but what happens there impacts us all.  In short, education matters.  Youth matters.

Many of you know of my leadership in the anti-war movement, from the days when I marched in Los Angeles and San Francisco to end the Vietnam War to the present tense when, in the last few years, I co-wrote resolutions putting the California Democratic Party on record calling for an end to US military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.  I am honored to have organized with Congresswoman Maxine Waters a 1,000 strong Out of Iraq town hall, and to have led a peace delegation from Los Angeles to Capitol Hill.

On the state level, you may also know that I worked hard to protect our vote, testifying in Sacramento against empowering the electronic voting industry, promoting Debra Bowen as Secretary of State - and beyond that working to make sure Bowen stayed in office.  My campaign manager Michael Jay and I, hearing that our own local Registrar was organizing to drive Bowen from office, circulated petitions and visited every county supervisors' office to support Bowen and her courageous stance to rid our polls of hackable touchscreen machines.

On another occasion, I testified in Sacramento against prison expansion -- this on the heels of the state assembly's passage of a bill to expand our prisons, despite the cost to our youth in California - where one out of every four African American men in their 20s is behind bars.

For those committed to single-payer health care, know that I have spent the last several years mobilizing support for single-payer, via letter-writing campaigns, party resolutions, and town hall forums.  At the start of my current congressional campaign, I ran a commercial challenging Jane Harman to sign on to Congressman Conyers' bill HR676 for single-payer health care.  Harman never did.

Finally, on the timely subject of the middle east, I distinguish myself from my opponent who chooses to appear at AIPAC conferences calling for the Balkanization of Iran and on Fox News announcing a military attack on Iran is still on the table.  In contrast, I am committed to a just and lasting peace that recognizes the equality and dignity of all in the middle east.  In that regard, I co-founded LA Jews for Peace and have worked to raise money to rebuild homes Israel has demolished in the West Bank.  There is no safety, nor security, nor dignity in perpetrating human rights violations.  I have repeatedly invited my opponent to join me in supporting universal human rights -- but she has not been forthcoming.

Clearly, the voters in the 36th congressional district have a choice on Tues., June 8th.  They can cast their vote for an incumbent who stands for war and Wall Street or a grassroots leader committed to peace and social justice.  While Harman is awash in corporate contributions, I am not taking a dime of corporate money because this is a people-powered campaign.  If you have not already gotten involved, there's still time, albeit only a few days left.  Email Bill@WinogradforCongress.com to phone bank or precinct walk and donate at WinogradforCongress.com Again, I want to thank you for your support and grassroots leadership. I am proud to work with you for progressive change in America.

Sincerely,

Marcy Winograd

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Thank you for this clarification (0.00 / 0)
and exposure of Ms. Evry's (nom de pen "msblucow") balderdash. Unless moved by some sense of misplaced loyalty, it is hard to fathom how someone calling themselves progressive -- if sincere -- could prefer Harman to Winograd.  Evry's arguments featured the twin faults of falsity and impotence, and were redolent more of personal antagonism and political hackery than of principle and sound argument, because after all, Harman's proven warlike anti-civil liberties record, and reluctance to support labor, are sadly plain for all to see.  

Let's elect a true progressive this time; the opportunity doesn't come around every election!


My response (0.00 / 0)
I've posted a response on my blog. http://veniceforchange.blogspo...

[ Parent ]
And the horse puckey from you continues (0.00 / 0)
1.  Now you say that you can make a "progressive" case for Harman, but she's not really a progressive.  The good part of that reversal/disavowal is that it defeats itself.

2.  As for the residency question, typical of people assaying trivial arguments, once you light the fire, you then claim they are really not significant in substance, but somehow the characterization of the facts by the candidate is.  The ol' bait and switch.  You were the one who raised the residency issue; you must have thought it important (though it's gratifying to see you don't really think so).  In Harman/SleazEnglander's most scurrilous Rovian mailer to date, however, they do lie and bluster about Winograd's residences, including absurd references to her time in college at Berkeley, and for that matter, her time under her parent's roof when she went to high school.  Should we count Harman's NYC birthplace, and her time at Smith and Harvard (not to mention DC before she was a Congressperson) against her, or are you willing to call out your own candidate and her sleazy campaign publicist/consultant for exaggerating and making stuff up?
I guess you and Margaret/Harv got your signals crossed, since you at least got it partially right that Winograd is now living in the district, as she has since August, 2008; they flat out lie when they say she doesn't.  

3.  It's amazing that you think it's a worthy point to compare Harman's nine-figure portfolio -- while ignoring Harman's war profiteering contributors -- to Marcy's investments, which as she explains, are no longer in her account.  We should be lamenting the fact that virtually no politician at least at the federal level can be successful without substantial sums of money to spend on campaigning; that is one of the problems with government, and Marcy would try to do something to fix it, whereas Harman revels in it, as do most Republicans. But the fact that Marcy has had the advantages of a relatively comfortable upbringing make what she's done and sacrificed no less commendable and in some ways, more so.  That comparison points up again why Harman acts as if she is entitled and comes across that way no matter how much verbal spin she applies to deny it.  So again, in ferreting out minutiae you actually make the better case for Winograd, once you allow the whole truth and the obvious missing facts to be folded in.  And again, in that same mailer inspired by Karl Rove, the anti-employee SleazEnglander and Harman totally obfuscate the profound difference between Harman's, um, financial "comfort level" and Winograd's.

4.  Finally, this raises the question as to why you have chosen to mount this crusade.  It's clear who is the true progressive in this race, you have retreated from the tepid "progressive lite" argument, and your substantive arguments are marginal at best, far exceeded by your evident hostility and determination to do damage to Winograd's candidacy.  So, msblucow, what's up with that?


[ Parent ]
Preserving the Progressive Movement (0.00 / 0)
I appreciate reading these posts by both Marcy and Marta. It is good to have civil debate. I just hope that those of us reading along don't let things like this divide us. Progressives must stick together on those many issues where we agree, while we agree to disagree on the few others. Let's not attack each other in public in ways that our opponents will use against us. Let's remember that we are friends and allies. Let's show respect for our similarities and our diversity. Let's work for peace by demonstrating our own peaceful coexistence.

Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox