[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Aquariumgate: Coalition Demands Fish and Game Commissioner's Resignation

by: Dan Bacher

Wed Mar 31, 2010 at 09:49:20 AM PDT


The Central Coast Fisheries Conservation Coalition (CCFCC), a recreational fishing group based out of San Luis Obispo, is demanding that Michael Sutton resign from his position as California Fish and Game Commissioner due to conflicts of interest in his votes regarding Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's fast track Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) initiative.

Schwarzenegger appointed Sutton, of Monterey, to the Commission on May 4, 2007. He was reappointed on March 25, 2009 to a six-year term. Sutton has served as vice president and founding director of the Center for the Future of the Oceans at the Monterey Bay Aquarium since 2004 - creating what the coalition claims is a clear conflict of interest when Sutton votes on the MLPA initiative, a process strongly supported by his employer.

The group contends that after almost a year of denials, "Sutton has finally acknowledged that his position as an employee and vice president of the Monterey Bay Aquarium conflicts with his role as a Commission member."

During the Commission meeting on March 3, 2010, Commissioner Richard Rogers, referring to the issue of scientific collection permits in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), stated, in Sutton's presence: "...Commissioner Sutton has to recuse himself from that discussion because the Monterey Bay Aquarium is actually involved as you know in scientific collections."

Sutton reportedly recused himself from the discussion on such permits in MPAs at the Marine Resources Committee meeting on February 16, 2010, according to CCFCC.

"It is obvious that the Aquarium has a financial stake in any decision relating to scientific collection permits in MPAs," said CCFCC Director Harold Davis. "As Commissioner Rogers said at the Commission meeting on March 3, 2010, scientific collection is 'big business.'"

"This is certainly true in the case of the Aquarium, which profits from the fees it charges to the public to view the marine creatures and plants that it collects and displays," explained Davis. "Moreover, there clearly is a benefit to being allowed to collect these specimens in MPAs, areas designated by the Commission where fishing and other uses by the public are restricted or forbidden."

Sutton's acknowledgment of a conflict is limited to decisions on scientific collection permits. However, the CCFCC charged, in a letter sent to the Commission on March 19, 2010, that his conflict of interest "extends to the formation and amendment of the MPAs in which the Aquarium will have scientific collection permits."

The coalition pointed out that "it would be inconsistent and irrational for Commissioner Sutton to take the position that he must recuse himself from discussions and votes concerning scientific collection permits in MPAs, but that he can vote to establish the very protected areas in which restraints are placed on the general public's use while extraction for scientific purposes by his employer is allowed."

In May 2009, the CCFCC filed a sworn complaint with the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) charging Sutton with violating the Political Reform Act (PRA) of 1974 because of his conflicts of interest on votes on MLPA while serving on the Fish and Game Commission. In a cursory evaluation, the FPPC ruled that it didn't find any financial conflicts of interests regarding Sutton's position.

"After conducting an investigation of your allegations in the sworn complaint, we found insufficient evidence to establish that a violation of the Political Reform Act occurred," wrote Neal P. Bucknell, Commission Counsel.

However, Davis emphasized that conflicts of interest are evaluated not merely under the Political Reform Act, which governs only financial conflicts, but also under the common law rules. "These rules are much broader and relate to any actual or potential conflict and to the mere appearance of a conflict," said Davis.

Former FGC Commission President Cindy Gustafson "apparently recognized this when she resigned last year," noted Davis. Gustafson said that her position as general manager of the Tahoe City Public Utilities District might give rise to a conflict sometime in the future even though according to her resignation letter, "... no past, present or currently foreseen issues have presented any concern whatsoever, [but] there is a hypothetical possibility that a future issue may arise and the law is quite clear that even this possibility creates the incompatibility described in the law."

"We find it amazing that Sutton, who has admitted that he has a conflict of interest, believes he can continue to sit on the Commission and make decisions that benefit his employer," said Davis, "given that Gustafson found it necessary to resign from the Commission with 'no past, present or currently foreseen' future conflicts."

Up until his recent acknowledgement that his position as an employee and vice president of the aquarium conflicts with his role as a Commission member, Sutton has persistently denied any conflict.

"Before I went on the Commission I went through a vetting process to determine if there were any issues like that or any conflicts of interest as defined by the state," Sutton said, as quoted by Ed Zieralski in the San Diego Union-Tribune on March 10, 2009. "There weren't any and nothing since then has changed. I have a deep interest in helping the ocean and working with the Commission to continue that process (http://www.signonsandiego.com/weblogs/san-diego-outdoors-blog/2009/mar/10/commissioner-michael-sutton-wont-recuse-himself-ml/).

Melvin de la Motte, CCFCC president, pointed out the absurdity of Sutton's denial of any conflict of interest until recently. "The Monterey Bay Aquarium leadership has publically admitted that they are pushing for no take zones under the MPLA," he stated. "How can Sutton claim to be neutral on votes on something, the MLPA, that his employer is an advocate for?"

De la Motte's contention was backed up by a San Jose Mercurcy News article by Paul Rogers on March 29, 2010 highlighting how the Aquarium, under the leadership of its executive director, Julie Packard, is "switching from education to advocacy." "Through its Center for the Future of the Oceans, the aquarium is urging the public to send an electronic form letter to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to support broad 'no fishing zones,' or marine protected areas, off Southern California," said Rogers (http://forums.mercurynews.com/topic/new-global-warming-exhibit-shows-steady-shift-from-education-to-advocacy-at-monterey-bay-aquar).

Faced with this egregious conflict of interest, CCFCC has asked the Commission to "confirm that Sutton will not vote on any issues relating to MPAs or, if the Commission refuses to provide this confirmation, for a written explanation of the reasons for its refusal."

The coalition believes the "proper course" would be for Sutton to resign. "We call for Sutton's immediate resignation from the Fish and Game Commission because of his now self-admitted conflict of interest," said Davis.

Schwarzenegger's Web of Corruption and Conflicts of Interest

The latest charge by CCCFA joins a myriad of charges of corruption and conflicts of interest that fishermen and North Coast environmentalists have leveled against officials involved in Schwarzenegger's MLPA Initative, a process that is privately funded by the Resource Legacy Fund Foundation.

Fishing and environmental groups have blasted Schwarzenegger for appointing to the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task force officials from the oil, real estate and marina development industries who have a vested interest in the how marine reserves are designated and implemented.

Advocates of democracy and transparency believe that it is no coincidence that Katherine Reheis-Boyd, the president of the Western States Petroleum Association, is chair of the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force for the South Coast and serves on the North Coast panel at a time when Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the oil industry want to install more oil rigs off the California coast.

"By setting up these no-take marine reserves and kicking fishermen, Indians, seaweed harvesters and other ocean food providers off traditional areas of the ocean, the Schwarzenegger administration is paving the way for offshore oil drilling," said John Lewallen, North Coast environmental leader and sustainable seaweed harvester. "Twenty-three percent of the nation's offshore oil reserves are off the coast of California. The Point Arena Basin off Mendocino is on track now to be leased for drilling by the Mineral Management Services."

Bob Fletcher, former president of the Sportfishing Association of California, recently claimed in a Fish and Game Commission meeting there was hard evidence that two members of the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force, Bill Anderson and Greg Schem, agreed "to sign off on everything else" in return for not putting a reserve in an area where both had marinas and business interests (http://www.sbsun.com/sports/ci_14523601). Anderson is president of Westrec Marina Management, while Schem is president and chief executive officer of Harbor Real Estate Group.

Cindy Gustafson, chair of the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force for the North Coast, responded to these allegations by saying, "I take personal offense to the allegations that members of the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force lied to the commission about business partnerships. Bill Anderson and Greg Schem have never been business partners and neither of them has ever invested in one another's projects. Further, their ownership interests in marina properties have been fully disclosed and no conflicts of interest exist."

However, how it is possible for her to say that "no conflicts of interest exist?" MLPA critics hold that the conflicts of interests are self-apparent, since both own businesses - real estate and marina development - that can clearly profit or be hurt by the designation of Marine Protected Areas. Just like Schwarzenegger appointed Reheis-Boyd to the task force to ensure that the oil industry's interests are served, the Governor appointed Anderson and Schem to make sure that real estate and marina development businesses are not harmed by the creation of MPAs.

The web of corruption and conflicts of interests is not limited to the MLPA, but extends to numerous other environmental appointments by Schwarzenegger, the worst Governor for fish and the environment in California history. In his zeal to drive collapsing Central Valley salmon and Delta fish populations over the abyss of extinction, Schwarzenegger recently appointed four backers of the peripheral canal/tunnel to the Delta Stewardship Council that will oversee the implementation of the water package that was rammed through the Legislature by Schwarzenegger and Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) last November.

Schwarzenegger on March 19 appointed Francis Randall "Randy" Fiorini, a Turlock agribusiness owner, Philip Isenberg, a veteran political hack and lobbyist for the Irvine Ranch Water District, Henry "Hank" Nordhoff, a bio-tech corporate executive, and Richard Roos-Collins, director of legal services for the Natural Heritage Institute, to the "distinguished" seven-member panel.

Environmentalists and fishermen have also exposed conflicts of interest on the state water boards. On March 21, Matt Weiser of the Sacramento Bee disclosed how "the leader of the state's largest water pollution regulator is married to a lobbyist for agencies it regulates, a potential conflict of interest she did not disclose publicly until an ethics complaint was brought against her (http://www.sacbee.com/2010/03/21/2622315/water-pollution-regulator-failed.html).

The state's Fair Political Practices Commission is investigating a 51-page complaint filed by the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA), against Katherine Hart Johns, chair of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. CSPA alleges that she failed to disclose, as mandated by the Political Reform Act, that her spouse was a registered lobbyist receiving substantial income from entities regulated under the Porter-Cologne and the federal Clean Water Act.

"The Schwarzenegger administration's approach to protecting water quality can best be described as appointing foxes to guard the chickens," summed up Bill Jennings, CSPA executive director.

There is no doubt that the Marine Life Protection Act, a law passed by the State Legislature and signed by Governor Gray Davis in 1999, has been hijacked by corrupt corporate interests. The text of the legislation states very clearly, "Coastal development, water pollution, and other human activities threaten the health of marine habitat and the biological diversity found in California's ocean waters."

Unfortunately, Schwarzenegger, a master corporate greenwasher, has completely taken coastal development, water pollution and other human activities other than fishing "off the table" in his MLPA process. He prefers instead to kick the strongest defenders of the ocean - recreational and commercial fishermen, Indian Tribal members and seaweed harvesters - off public ocean waters to clear a path for oil rigs, corporate aquaculture, marina development and wave energy projects.

Dan Bacher :: Aquariumgate: Coalition Demands Fish and Game Commissioner's Resignation
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

What a bunch of crap (0.00 / 0)
If you cant win on the science, do you really have to resort to making stuff up?

And what about YOUR conflict of interest, Dan? Accepting thousands of dollars of advertising from fishing interests and then writing about a law that would finally stop your advertisers from depleting fisheries?

How much is the PSO paying you anyway?


Why do you support Schwarzenegger's corrupt MLPA fiasco? (0.00 / 0)
Steve

Why do you so fervently support the failed ocean policies of a Republican who is the worst Governor in California history for fish and the environment?

Why aren't you concerned about the numerous conflicts of interest that infest Schwarzenegger's MLPA fiasco?

How can you possibly support the South Coast MLPA process when it is led by the head oil lobbyist for the Western U.S.?

Enlighten yourself please by reading this article about how Catherine Reheis-Boyd, one of Schwarzenegger's "marine guardians," is pushing for new oil drilling off the California coast.

The only "crap" I'm aware of is the barrage of propaganda from the Schwarzenegger administration and supporters of his MLPA process like yourself about how "great" the MLPA Initiative when it is in fact controlled by oil industry, real estate and marine development interests and private foundations engaged in a huge effort to privatize public trust resources.

MLPA Task Force Chair Calls for More Oil Drilling off California Coast

by Dan Bacher

An oil industry lobbyist who chairs a panel in charge of developing controversial marine reserves on the Southern California Coast this week called for new oil drilling in California ocean waters.

Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA), told the San Francisco Chronicle that she hopes the Obama administration "will eventually allow new drilling off the California coast." (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/03/31/MNU41CO3O4.DTL)

"We are disappointed," Reheis-Boyd said, in response to Obama's announcement Wednesday that the U.S. will begin drilling for oil in the waters off the Atlantic Coast and the Gulf of Mexico. "When you look at the resources here, they're considerable."

Reheis-Boyd is chair of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force for the South Coast. She also sat on the MLPA Task Force for the North Central Coast and now sits on the task force for the North Coast.

Critics of her appointment to the panels believe that she has been placed there to protect the oil industry's interests - and to make sure that so-called "Marine Protected Areas" don't conflict with the operation of existing offshore oil rigs or the installation of new rigs if the Obama administration lifts the ban on oil drilling off the California coast.

"There are more than 10 billion barrels of crude oil reserves located off the California coast and huge reserves of natural gas," Reheis-Boyd said earlier this year in "A Message from WSPA" on the oil industry group's website (http://www.wspa.org/wspa-message.aspx?id=17). "Our industry has demonstrated over the past 40 years it can and does operate safely in the marine environment."

Reheis-Boyd also told the Santa Rosa Press Democrat that she was "disappointed" by Obama's decision to continue excluding California's "resource-rich" waters from energy development.

"Without added offshore oil development, the state would have to bring in more oil by tanker, and 'we don't want that,'" Reheis-Boyd said, according to the Press Democrat (http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20100401/NEWS/4011015?p=4&tc=pg).

John Stephens-Lewallen and other North Coast environmentalists and fishermen have charged that the Marine Life Protection Act, a law passed by the State Legislature and signed by Governor Gray Davis in 1999, has been hijacked by oil industry, real estate and marina development interests under the Schwarzenegger administration. The MLPA Initiative since 2004 has been funded by a private corporation, the Resource Legacy Fund Foundation.

The text of the legislation states very clearly, "Coastal development, water pollution, and other human activities threaten the health of marine habitat and the biological diversity found in California's ocean waters."

However, Schwarzenegger has completely taken coastal development, water pollution and other human activities other than fishing and seaweed harvesting "off the table" in his MLPA process. Schwarzenegger is an advocate of increased oil drilling off the California coast - and the appointment of Reheis-Boyd on all three "marine protection" task forces fits his plan to destroy and plunder the California coast.

"In March, Reheis-Boyd assured the Fort Bragg City Council that setting up marine reserves had nothing to do with opening offshore oil drilling up," said Stephens-Lewallen. "But at same time, Reheis-Boyd and other members of the task force toured port facilities at the Albion and Noyo harbors where we suspect the oil industry could eventually install onshore facilities to be used in tandem with offshore rigs. The North Coast Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) seem designed to eliminate the fishing industry in the Point Area area, since they bracket the harbor."

Stephens-Lewallen questions whether the placement of these marine reserves has been designed to facilitate the development of offshore oil in the Point Arena Basin in Mendocino County. This is one of the areas the oil industry is most interested in exploring for oil - and is one of the greatest marine ecosystems, sustained by upwelling, on the West Coast.

"Any oil pollution generated from normal operations or a spill will be carried by the California current all of the way to Monterey Bay," said Stephens-Lewallen.

Governor Schwarzenegger has fast-tracked the MLPA process at the same time that he is pushing for the construction of a peripheral canal and new dams to provide increased water exports from the California Delta to corporate agribusiness, southern California water agencies and water privateers. The construction of the peripheral canal is likely to result in the extinction of Central Valley salmon, Delta smelt, green sturgeon and other fish populations.

Schwarzenegger's peripheral canal campaign and his privately funded MLPA process are the two sides of the same corporate greenwashing process that facilitates the privatization of public trust resources at the expense of fish populations, fishing communities, California Indian Tribes and the democratic process.

About Reheis-Boyd's Group: The Western States Petroleum Association is the leading petroleum industry trade association in six western states - California, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. Its twenty-eight members include major integrated oil and natural gas companies as well as independent refiners and marketers, and independent producers. Formed in 1906, it is the oldest petroleum industry trade association in the United States.


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox