[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Wire Services
Advertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Color Me Shocked! Prop 11 Commission Pool Leans Heavily White Male

by: Brian Leubitz

Wed Feb 17, 2010 at 10:48:00 AM PST


I've got nothing against white males. After all, I am one. But when it comes to a panel pretending to represent the state, these are some very disconcerting numbers:

The deadline for Californians to apply for a first-of-its-kind citizens commission to draw districts for legislative elections ended Tuesday night with the field of applicants tilting heavily toward white men. Of the nearly 31,000 applications received, whites submitted 70 percent, far higher than their 41 percent share of California's population. (SacBee)

Latinos were the most heavily under-represented, with only about 11.5% in the pool despite their 37% share of the state's population.

During the Prop 11 campaign, minority organizations across the state opposed this nonsense, saying that this exact situation would occur. And sure enough, here we are.  I hope everybody remembers this day when the ballot proposition to use a similar pattern to redistrict Congress comes up.  Well, I'll do my best to remind, anyway.

Despite these bad numbers, there were still 31,000 applicants. So, we should expect to see a decently representative first cut as the auditor's office does the work to balance things out. But if you applied, and you are a Latino female? Well, expect a call.

In the end, my best guess of how this works is that we'll get a map that is perhaps a bit more "blockish", but still producing similar numbers of similarly partisan Republicans and Democrats. At heart, Prop 11 misses the simple truth that we have self-sorted over the past 50 years. There's no way to draw a competitive seat in SF or in far Northeastern California.  Just isn't, no matter how dedicated these people are.

So, maybe we'll get a map, maybe we'll just go back to the judges. Either way, not a whole lot changes, and the state is pout $5 million or so.  Sounds like a great plan guys, can't we emulate this everywhere!

Brian Leubitz :: Color Me Shocked! Prop 11 Commission Pool Leans Heavily White Male
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Darn! Missed the deadline.. (0.00 / 0)
I totally would've applied for it, being latino, gay, vetically-challenged, and earning less than 30,000 a year. Perhaps my chances would've been good? ;-)

It will be interesting to see how this all pans out, from the process, to the end result. Much as I had reservations about the intiative when it was on the ballot, I ended up voting for it, since in my mind, it at least addressed the problem of gerrymandering in some form. That said, I'm disapointed to hear about the poor representation of minorities.

In regards to district competitinevess, I once heard someone joke that a truly competitive district would start on the coast and stretch into the central part of the state, like spokes on a wheel.  


Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Get discounted bestsellers at Barnes & Noble.com!

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox