[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics

Will Pelosi Call DiFi's Reckless Bluff?

by: Robert Cruickshank

Wed Nov 11, 2009 at 07:00:00 AM PST


Sometime next month Time Magazine will announce their "Person of the Year," and it should be obvious by now who best personifies 2009: Herbert Hoover. 80 years after he helped the nation slide into Depression with his austerity budgets and refusal to use government to help provide relief and recovery, his basic approach to political economy is enjoying quite a renaissance. Alongside Sacramento, one of the most prominent places to embrace the new Hooverism has been the United States Senate.

Now it looks like they're moving to up the Hooverite ante, and two of California's powerful federal politicians are at the center of the debate. Sen. Dianne Feinstein is joining 6 other Senators to demand that Speaker Nancy Pelosi approve a commission to recommend cuts to Medicare and Social Security - or else they'll refuse to vote to increase the US government's debt ceiling:

Congress is under pressure to raise the cap on what the federal government can borrow by mid-December. If the debt ceiling is not raised above its current $12.1 trillion mark by then, the government will exceed its borrowing limits and will be forced to default on the debt. Economists have warned that the inevitable result would be a lowering of the U.S. credit rating, triggering substantial increases in the interest rates the government is already paying.

But before Tuesday's hearing was over, Sens. Conrad, Gregg, Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), George Voinovich (R-Ohio) and Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) publicly vowed to vote against raising the debt ceiling if a budget reform commission bill doesn't come along with it.

Chris Bowers at Open Left called this a national suicide pact, an apt description for this truly reckless demand:

Let's review the threat that these five Democrats are making:

   * They will allow the United States to default on its debt, which will vastly increase the overall amount we have to pay on our debt

     UNLESS

   * Speaker Nancy Pelosi turns over Congressional power on Social Security and Medicare to an unelected commission that will almost certainly propose deep cuts in Social Security and Medicare entitlements.  Keep in mind that deep cuts to Social security and Medicare that pass under a Democratic trifecta would doom the party at the ballot box for years to come.

This is completely insane, and there is no choice but to call this bluff.

Bowers goes on to point out the obvious fact that if these Senators did cause the US to default on its debt (the practical effect of refusing to increase the debt ceiling) their political careers would all be over, so we have nothing to lose by calling their bluff.

And he is right. Cutting Medicare and Social Security benefits would be a truly insane, reckless, and radical act. At a time when the US economy is entering a period of long-term high unemployment, the very last thing you want to be doing is further undermining the ability of Americans, particularly the aged, to make ends meet.

Cuts in Social Security and Medicare will not only ripple through the economy in the form of reduced spending, they'll also ripple through younger generations, who will fill the gap lost by the cutting of government benefits with money out of their own pockets to help their elderly relatives make ends meet and get the treatment they need.

Feinstein is embracing Hooverism, putting Democratic gains at risk, and threatening to make our economic crisis permanent. Of course, in doing so she's merely going with the flow in both DC and Sacramento, so it's not like she's some kind of outlier.

Still, this kind of insane policymaking has to be stopped. Pelosi should call Feinstein's bluff. Anyone here who thinks Feinstein would actually enable a debt default, please raise your hands. Didn't think so. Pelosi already got rolled once this month by a block of regressive Democrats willing to risk future elections in order to roll back rights and screw the poor and the middle class. She shouldn't let it happen again.

Robert Cruickshank :: Will Pelosi Call DiFi's Reckless Bluff?
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Has Difi lost her mind? (0.00 / 0)
Seriously,

WTF?

This is not only horrible economics but worse politics.

OC Progressive is Gus Ayer, former Fountain Valley Council member.  


OMG (0.00 / 0)
You see Democrats are supposed to be the party that cares for people. We're supposed to want them to have food and health care. We're supposed to care about their rights--like the rights of women to make our own reproductive choices.

But here is a Democratic congressman, and C Street resident like Senator Ensign, putting his name on the most sweeping restriction of reproductive rights in decades. And here is a Democratic senator proposing cuts to the lifeline of the elderly.

Republicans already have an advantage with older voters. The GOP has lately been touting themselves as defenders of Medicare, despite their resolute opposition to its passage. Feinstein seems intent on solidifying that. This doesn't even consider the Baby Boomers who are just starting to enter these programs, trailed by those who find it almost impossible to find jobs in today's economy and are really, truly just hanging on until they qualify.

Then there are women, statistically more than half the country's population. Democrats do, traditionally, have an edge with women voters. Looking at the way House Republicans shouted down female legislators who tried to speak against Stupak-Pitt gives you some idea why. And women voters care about abortion restrictions. I promise you we do--those of us not suffering from Stockholm Syndrome caused by endless browbeating from male pastors.

So, in one week, Democrats have proposed to court the undying emnity of one group, and risked that of one of their larger voting blocks. Brilliant!

Coming off of the loss of his own former seat, DNC chair (and ex VA governor)Kaine should be so proud. This is a strategic coup.


DiFi's Nuts (0.00 / 0)
DiFi's Nuts if She thinks Seniors and others will take this laying down, Her Career will be over with, Like Yesterday.

[ Parent ]
Who knows what kind of game she's running (0.00 / 0)
If this is really what is going on, who knows what DiFi is actually angling at.  She is known to leverage one threat and then settle on something else.

But maybe she's really into cutting benefits for seniors. Who knows?

I think?


[ Parent ]
Calitics in the Media
Archives & Bookings
The Calitics Radio Show
Calitics Premium Ads


Support Calitics:

Advertisers


-->
California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch

Daily Email Summary


Powered by: SoapBlox